Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Facebook class groups of high school students: their role in establishing social dynamics and learning experiences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study’s main aim was to explore the role of Facebook class groups, created and managed by high-school students, in facilitating social dynamics and learning experiences. Fourteen Facebook class groups were observed online and students were subsequently questioned through focus-group interviews. Our findings show that Facebook class groups can promote both bonding and learning. Bonding can be enhanced because Facebook class groups foster a sense of solidarity and unity among students. Also, Facebook can stimulate (social) learning because students gain more insights in the subject matter and are challenged to carry out an evaluation of their own study methods and progress. Therefore, drawing on the theories of seamless learning and affinity spaces, we conclude that Facebook class groups are important for social affiliation and effective learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology,41(1), 160–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aboudan, R. (2009). Laugh and learn: Humor and learning a second language. International Journal of Arts and Sciences,3(3), 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J., & Franklin, T. (2008). A review of current and developing international practice in the use of social networking (Web 2.0) in higher education. York: St John University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger, D. U., & Inan, F. A. (2012). Development and validation of the online student connectedness survey (OSCS). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,13(3), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, T. E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research,35(2), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers-Campbell, J. (2008). Cyber pokes: Motivational antidote for developmental college readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning,39(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,13(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2010). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior,27, 1337–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Communication from the European commission: Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-general for Education and Culture and Directorate-general for Employment and Social Affairs.

  • Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape—opportunities, challenges and tensions. Becta Research reports.

  • Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Students’ educational use of Facebook groups. Educational Media International,53(4), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations,2, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, K. K., Bing, S. G., Carlson, R. E., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A. M., & Fus, D. A. (2001). Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports,21(3), 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication strategies. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From the age of mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power, and social context (pp. 214–233). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaith, G. (2003). The relationship between forms of instruction, achievement and perceptions of classroom climate. Educational Research,45(1), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces,36, 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C. (2011). Online social networks and learning. On the horizon,19(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G. A., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior,29, 604–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior,27, 662–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, R. (2015). Facebook & users: Who is using whom? A material semiotic approach to the irreversibilisation of Facebook as a case of lifeworld colonisation by social media (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

  • Jiménez Guamán, L. V. (2012). EFL Teenagers’ social identity representation in a virtual learning community on Facebook. Profile,14(2), 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning. Educational Technology,28(11), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Whon, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,6, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and axiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1943). Psychology and the process of group living. Journal of Social Psychology,17, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflict. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q. (2011). The role of web-based activities in mediating student interaction and engagement in four teacher education classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,7(1), 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, R. G., & Moosavi, S. A. (1998). Using humor to teach statistics; Must they be orthogonal? Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences,1(2), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G. (2006). Online learning community in the context of distance education: A case study. Dissertation, Department of Instructional Systems Technology, Indiana University.

  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology,34(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted learning,29(6), 487–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2014). Does Facebook provide educational value? An overview of theoretical and empirical advancements of affordances and critical issues. In G. Mallia (Ed.), The social classroom: Integrating social network use in education (pp. 312–338). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continued Education, 89, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, C., & Falci, C. D. (2004). School connectedness and the transition into and out of health-risk behaviour among adolescents: A comparison of social belonging and teacher support. Journal of School Health,74(7), 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mediaraven, & LINC. (2016). Onderzoeksrapport Apestaartjaren 6. Belgium.

  • Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,13(4), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National School Boards Association. (2007). Creating & connecting: Research and guidelines on online social- and educational-networking. Retrieved June 3, 2018, from http://www.webcitation.org/5aGqKNY66.

  • Powell, J. P. A. (1985). Humor and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education,10(1), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provine, R. (2002). The science of laughter. Psychology Today,33(6), 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugsley, L. (1996). Focus groups, young people and sex education. In J. Pilcher & A. Coffey (Eds.), Gender and qualitative research (pp. 114–130). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study if professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology,43(5), 754–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rap, S., & Blonder, R. (2016). Let’s Face(book) it: Analyzing interactions in social network groups for chemistry learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology,25, 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Hoyos, C., Salmón, I. H., & Fernández-Díaz, E. (2015). Research on SNS and education: The state of the art and its challenges. Australian Journal of Educational technology,31(1), 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I., Levine, H., Bashman, R., & Linder, K. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology,34(2), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,2(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Weller, M. (2011). The impact of social networks on teaching and learning. [online monograph]. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC),8(1), 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., Weinberger, A., Asterhan, C., Hever, R., et al. (2014). When friends argue: Investigating argumentative learning processes in facebook. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS,3, 1342–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, M. (2007). Onderwijskunde als ontwerpwetenschap: Een inleiding voor ontwikkelaars van instructie en voor toekomstige leerkrachten. Ghent: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlieghe, J., Muls, J., & Rutten, K. (2015). Everybody reads: Reader engagement with literature in social media environments. Poetics,54, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics,68, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education,57(4), 2364–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. H., Milrad, M., & Specht, M. (2015). Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Chi-Wai Kwok, R. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education,55, 1494–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Jaël Muls, Free De Backer, Valérie Thomas, Chang Zhu & Koen Lombaerts

Authors
  1. Jaël Muls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Free De Backer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valérie Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Koen Lombaerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaël Muls.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muls, J., De Backer, F., Thomas, V. et al. Facebook class groups of high school students: their role in establishing social dynamics and learning experiences. Learning Environ Res 23, 235–250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09298-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09298-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation