Abstract
Statistics is a required subject of study in many academic disciplines, including business, education and psychology, that causes problems for many students. This has long been recognised and there have been a number of studies into students’ attitudes towards statistics, particularly statistical anxiety. However, none of these studies investigated the classroom learning environment in relation to students’ attitudes towards statistics. This paper describes the development and validation of two new instruments, the Business Statistics Computer Laboratory Environment Inventory and the Attitude towards Business Statistics instrument. The former measures appropriate aspects of the learning environment of a computer-based statistics class, whilst the latter measures students’ attitudes towards business statistics. The instruments were administered to undergraduate business students at a university in Southern California. When exploratory factor analysis was carried out, it was found that the items of both instruments loaded onto their a priori scales. All the scales exhibited both internal reliability and discriminant validity. Correlation analysis between the scales of the two instruments demonstrated a strong relationship between aspects of the learning environment and students’ attitudes towards business statistics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131–150.
Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10(1), 67–82.
Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1968). Classroom climate and group learning. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 178–180.
Anderson, G. J., Walberg, H. J., & Welch, W. W. (1968). Curriculum effects on the social climate of learning: A new representation of discriminant functions. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 315–328.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2012). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards-busn-jan2012.pdf
Bell, J. A. (1998). International students have statistics anxiety too! Education, 118, 634–636.
British Academy. (2012). Society counts. http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Society_Counts.cfm
Carlson, K. A., & Winquist, J. R. (2011). Evaluating an active learning approach to teaching introductory statistics: A classroom workbook approach. Journal of Statistics Education, 191, 1–22.
Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 31–44.
Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In M. S. Khine & D. L. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1–20). Singapore: World Scientific.
Cook, A. (2010). Improving the success rate in statistics (No. 415). Brisbane: University of Queensland, School of Economics.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Cruise, R. J., Cash, R. W., & Bolton, D. L. (1985, August). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the statistical education section. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Chicago, IL.
Dorman, J. P. (2008). Use of multitrait-multimethod modeling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 11, 179–193.
Dorman, J. P., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Psychosocial environment and affective outcomes in technology-rich classrooms: Testing a causal model. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 77–99.
Finney, S. J., & Schraw, G. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 161–186.
Francis, G., & Lipson, K. (2010, July). The importance of teaching statistics in a professional context. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on teaching statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509–515.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–34.
Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high school science. Science Education, 77(1), 1–24.
Fraser, B. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1986). Validity and use of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education. Higher Education, 15(1–2), 37–57.
Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357.
Gordon, S. (2004). Understanding students’ experiences of statistics in a service course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(1), 40–59.
Green, J. J., Stone, C. C., Zegeye, A., & Charles, T. A. (2009). How much math do students need to succeed in business and economics statistics? An ordered probit analysis. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3), 1–22.
Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25–46.
Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691–705.
Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W., & Chiu, K. K. (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behaviour, 252, 412–420.
Jegede, O. J., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1995). The development and validation of a distance and open learning environment scale. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 89–94.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.
Kek, M., & Huijser, H. (2011). Exploring the combined relationships of student and teacher factors on learning approaches and self-directed learning readiness at a Malaysian University. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 185–208.
Khine, M. S., & Fisher, D. L. (Eds.). (2003). Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
Lalonde, R. N., & Gardner, R. C. (1993). Statistics as a second language? Model for predicting performance in psychology students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 108–125.
Liu, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Meng, L. (2012). Examination of the score reliability and validity of the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 11(1), 29–42.
Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.
McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Lee, C., & Fouladi, R. T. (2007). Introductory statistics, college student attitudes and knowledge—A qualitative analysis of the impact of technology based instruction. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 19, 65–83.
Newby, M. (2002). An empirical study comparing the learning environments of open and closed computer laboratories. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(4), 303–314.
Newby, M., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). An instrument for assessing the learning environment of a computer laboratory. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 179–190.
Newby, M., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). A model of the relationship between university computer laboratory environment and student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 3(1), 51–66.
Newby, M., & Nguyen, T. H. (2010). Using the same problem with different techniques in programming assignments: An empirical study of its effectiveness. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(4), 375–382.
Nguyen, T. H., & Hampson, P. (2012, March). Improving students’ learning outcomes in university business statistics modules: Increase contact hours or increase relevance? Paper presented at the 5th Annual Northeast Universities (3 Rivers Consortium) Regional Learning and Teaching Conference, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, UK.
Nguyen, T. H., & Ulbrich, F. (2013, August). The effectiveness of different grading strategies: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2013, 15–17 Chicago, IL.
Okan, Z. (2008). Computing laboratory classes as language learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 11(1), 31–48.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Statistics anxiety and the role of self-perceptions. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 323–335.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3–19.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Da Ros, D., & Ryan, J. M. (1997). The components of statistics anxiety: A phenomenological study. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(4), 11–35.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Seaman, M. (1995). The effect of time and anxiety on statistics achievement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 115–124.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Wilson, V. A. (2003). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects and treatments—A comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 195–209.
Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2005). Students’ perceptions on factors of statistics anxiety and instructional strategies. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 205–214.
Petocz, P. (1998). Effective video-based resources for learning statistics. In Statistical education—Expanding the network, fifth international conference on teaching statistics (pp. 985–991).
Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2005). Something strange and useless: Service students’ conceptions of statistics, learning statistics and using statistics in their future profession. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 789–800.
Ramirez, C., Schau, C., & Emmioglu, E. (2012). The importance of attitudes in statistics education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 57–71.
Ramsey, J. B. (1999, August). Why do students find statistics so difficult? In Proceedings of the 52th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Schau, C. (2003). Students’ attitudes: The “other” important outcome in statistics education. In Proceedings of the joint statistical meetings (pp. 3673–3681).
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2010). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Taylor, B. A., & Fraser, B. J. (2013). Relationships between learning environment and mathematics anxiety. Learning Environments Research, 16, 297–313.
Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 93–102.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.
Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 171–202.
Williams, A. S. (2010). Statistics anxiety and instructor immediacy. Journal of Statistics Education, 18, 1–18.
Williams, M., Payne, G., Hodgkinson, L., & Poade, D. (2008). Does British sociology count? Sociology students’ attitudes toward quantitative methods. Sociology, 42, 1003–1021.
Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321–341.
Wu, W., Chang, H. P., & Guo, C. J. (2009). The development of an instrument for a technology-integrated science learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 207–233.
Zanakis, S. H., & Valenzi, E. R. (1997). Student anxiety and attitudes in business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 10–16.
Zeidner, M. (1991). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: Some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 319–328.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Professor Darrell Fisher of Curtin University, Western Australia for his insightful comments on an early draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, T.H., Newby, M. & Skordi, P.G. Development and use of an instrument to measure students’ perceptions of a business statistics learning environment in higher education. Learning Environ Res 18, 409–424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9192-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9192-3