Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and use of an instrument to measure students’ perceptions of a business statistics learning environment in higher education

Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistics is a required subject of study in many academic disciplines, including business, education and psychology, that causes problems for many students. This has long been recognised and there have been a number of studies into students’ attitudes towards statistics, particularly statistical anxiety. However, none of these studies investigated the classroom learning environment in relation to students’ attitudes towards statistics. This paper describes the development and validation of two new instruments, the Business Statistics Computer Laboratory Environment Inventory and the Attitude towards Business Statistics instrument. The former measures appropriate aspects of the learning environment of a computer-based statistics class, whilst the latter measures students’ attitudes towards business statistics. The instruments were administered to undergraduate business students at a university in Southern California. When exploratory factor analysis was carried out, it was found that the items of both instruments loaded onto their a priori scales. All the scales exhibited both internal reliability and discriminant validity. Correlation analysis between the scales of the two instruments demonstrated a strong relationship between aspects of the learning environment and students’ attitudes towards business statistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1968). Classroom climate and group learning. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 178–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. J., Walberg, H. J., & Welch, W. W. (1968). Curriculum effects on the social climate of learning: A new representation of discriminant functions. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2012). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards-busn-jan2012.pdf

  • Bell, J. A. (1998). International students have statistics anxiety too! Education, 118, 634–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Academy. (2012). Society counts. http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Society_Counts.cfm

  • Carlson, K. A., & Winquist, J. R. (2011). Evaluating an active learning approach to teaching introductory statistics: A classroom workbook approach. Journal of Statistics Education, 191, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In M. S. Khine & D. L. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1–20). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. (2010). Improving the success rate in statistics (No. 415). Brisbane: University of Queensland, School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruise, R. J., Cash, R. W., & Bolton, D. L. (1985, August). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the statistical education section. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Dorman, J. P. (2008). Use of multitrait-multimethod modeling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 11, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Psychosocial environment and affective outcomes in technology-rich classrooms: Testing a causal model. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney, S. J., & Schraw, G. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, G., & Lipson, K. (2010, July). The importance of teaching statistics in a professional context. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on teaching statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high school science. Science Education, 77(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1986). Validity and use of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education. Higher Education, 15(1–2), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (2004). Understanding students’ experiences of statistics in a service course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(1), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. J., Stone, C. C., Zegeye, A., & Charles, T. A. (2009). How much math do students need to succeed in business and economics statistics? An ordered probit analysis. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W., & Chiu, K. K. (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behaviour, 252, 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O. J., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1995). The development and validation of a distance and open learning environment scale. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M., & Huijser, H. (2011). Exploring the combined relationships of student and teacher factors on learning approaches and self-directed learning readiness at a Malaysian University. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khine, M. S., & Fisher, D. L. (Eds.). (2003). Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde, R. N., & Gardner, R. C. (1993). Statistics as a second language? Model for predicting performance in psychology students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Meng, L. (2012). Examination of the score reliability and validity of the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 11(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Lee, C., & Fouladi, R. T. (2007). Introductory statistics, college student attitudes and knowledge—A qualitative analysis of the impact of technology based instruction. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 19, 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, M. (2002). An empirical study comparing the learning environments of open and closed computer laboratories. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(4), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, M., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). An instrument for assessing the learning environment of a computer laboratory. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newby, M., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). A model of the relationship between university computer laboratory environment and student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 3(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newby, M., & Nguyen, T. H. (2010). Using the same problem with different techniques in programming assignments: An empirical study of its effectiveness. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(4), 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. H., & Hampson, P. (2012, March). Improving students’ learning outcomes in university business statistics modules: Increase contact hours or increase relevance? Paper presented at the 5th Annual Northeast Universities (3 Rivers Consortium) Regional Learning and Teaching Conference, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, UK.

  • Nguyen, T. H., & Ulbrich, F. (2013, August). The effectiveness of different grading strategies: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2013, 15–17 Chicago, IL.

  • Okan, Z. (2008). Computing laboratory classes as language learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 11(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Statistics anxiety and the role of self-perceptions. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Da Ros, D., & Ryan, J. M. (1997). The components of statistics anxiety: A phenomenological study. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(4), 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Seaman, M. (1995). The effect of time and anxiety on statistics achievement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Wilson, V. A. (2003). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects and treatments—A comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2005). Students’ perceptions on factors of statistics anxiety and instructional strategies. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petocz, P. (1998). Effective video-based resources for learning statistics. In Statistical educationExpanding the network, fifth international conference on teaching statistics (pp. 985–991).

  • Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2005). Something strange and useless: Service students’ conceptions of statistics, learning statistics and using statistics in their future profession. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 789–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, C., Schau, C., & Emmioglu, E. (2012). The importance of attitudes in statistics education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. B. (1999, August). Why do students find statistics so difficult? In Proceedings of the 52th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Schau, C. (2003). Students’ attitudes: The “other” important outcome in statistics education. In Proceedings of the joint statistical meetings (pp. 3673–3681).

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2010). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. A., & Fraser, B. J. (2013). Relationships between learning environment and mathematics anxiety. Learning Environments Research, 16, 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 171–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. S. (2010). Statistics anxiety and instructor immediacy. Journal of Statistics Education, 18, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., Payne, G., Hodgkinson, L., & Poade, D. (2008). Does British sociology count? Sociology students’ attitudes toward quantitative methods. Sociology, 42, 1003–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., Chang, H. P., & Guo, C. J. (2009). The development of an instrument for a technology-integrated science learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanakis, S. H., & Valenzi, E. R. (1997). Student anxiety and attitudes in business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (1991). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: Some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Professor Darrell Fisher of Curtin University, Western Australia for his insightful comments on an early draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Newby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, T.H., Newby, M. & Skordi, P.G. Development and use of an instrument to measure students’ perceptions of a business statistics learning environment in higher education. Learning Environ Res 18, 409–424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9192-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9192-3

Keywords

Navigation