Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural communication learning environment in science classes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classroom communication often involves interactions between students and teachers from dissimilar cultures, which influence classroom learning because of their dissimilar communication styles influenced by their cultures. It is therefore important to study the influence of culture on classroom communication that influences the classroom verbal and nonverbal interactions. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new instrument to assess eight scales of students’ classroom communication learning environment: Body Language, Communication Rate, Communication Loudness, Eye Contact, English Usage, Verbal Support, Intra-gender Communication and Inter-gender Communication. The instrument was administered to 1,723 upper-secondary biology students in Brunei government schools. The alpha reliability (0.58–0.91) and discrimination validity (0.08–0.13) coefficients for these scales were within acceptable ranges. Statistically significant η2 coefficients suggested that the instrument was able to differentiate between participating biology classes. Students perceived a low level verbal support and sometimes higher teacher communication rate in their classes. Dialects other than English, which is the medium of instruction, have been used in biology classes to some extent. There is a strong tendency for intra-gender than inter-gender communications in classes, which could limit the effectiveness of teaching and learning in constructivist classes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46, 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Towards a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Culture and Comparative Studies, 81, 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Processes of science. Retrieved March 20, 2005, from http://www.usash.ca/education/people/aikenhead/procsci.htm.

  • Albert, R. D. (1998). Latinos in the United States: Diversity, cultural patterns, and misconceptions. In K. S. Sitaram & M. H. Prosser (Eds.), Civic discourse: Multiculturalism, cultural diversity, and global communication (pp. 157–175). London: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, O. R. (1971). Quantitative analysis of structure in leaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M., Salter, V., Nicholson, H., Williams, M., & Burgess, P. (1970). The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A. (1997). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (pp. 189–207). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, A. E. (2009). Reading the hidden communications around you: A guide to reading body language in the workplace. New York: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatner, A. (2009). About nonverbal communications. Retrieved January 15, 2012, from http://www.blatner.com/adam/level2/nverb1.htm

  • BLCCE. (n.d.). Brunei—language, culture, customs and etiquette. Retrieved November 4, 2010, from http://www.kwintessential.co.uk/resources/global-etiquette/brunei.html.

  • Blumsack, J. T., & Anderson, K. L. (2004). Back to school! 13 facts revisited. The Hearing Review, September. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from http://www.hearingreview.com/issues/articles/2004-09_01.asp.

  • Booth, E., Abdulla, S., Lingham, G., Singh, G., Wilson, M., & Armour, L. (1998, December). Student teachers perception of teaching and learning conditions in Fiji and Maldives. Paper presented at Australian Association of Educational Research annual conference, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Borg, J. (2008). Body language: 7 Easy lessons to master the silent language. London: Prentice Hall Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borneo-Bulletin. (2004). Brunei yearbook. Gadong, Brunei: Brunei Press SDN BHD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borneo-Bulletin. (2005). Brunei yearbook: Key information on Brunei. Bandar Seri Begawan: Brunei Press SDN BHD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunei Government. (2009). Information on Brunei. Retrieved March 29, 2009, from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0107361.html.

  • Bucher, R. D. (2000). Diversity consciousness: Opening our minds to people, cultures, and opportunities. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in the classroom: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, E. (2004). Embracing cultural diversity and enhancing students’ learning environment. Tri-annual Newsletter of CDTL, 8(3), 6–7. Retrieved February 23, 2005, from http://www.cdtl.nos.edu.sgjjjkiov2004/le.htm.

  • Cordeiro, P. A., Regan, T., & Mainez, L. P. (1994). Understanding cultural diversity. In L. E. Fraser (Ed.), Multiculturalism and TQE: Addressing cultural diversity in schools (Vol. 7, pp. 1–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (2006). The culture of body language. Retrieved September 7, 2010, from http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/22546/the_culture_of_body_language_pg3.html?cat=4.

  • Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S. (1989). Studies on mathematical modeling of human information processing of meaningful information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

  • Dhindsa, H. S. (2005). Cultural learning environment of upper secondary science students. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S. (2006). Teacher communication behaviour and enjoyment of science lessons. In M. B. Klein (Ed.), New teaching and teacher issues (pp. 115–140). New York: Nova Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S. (2007). Cultural dimensions in the learning environment in Brunei. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S. (2009). Teacher communication in Bruneian secondary science classes: Wait time. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 25, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S., & Anderson, O. R. (1992). A model of the effects of the rate of teacher communication on students’ acquisition of information. Science Education, 76, 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S., & Fraser, B. J. (2004). Culturally-sensitive factors in teacher trainees’ learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 7, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, H. S., & Mohd-Salleh, K. (2009). Socio-cultural factors of learning environments of secondary science students in non-government schools. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, L. (Ed.). (2004, October 23). Excess teacher talks swamps children. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://newsstore.smh.com.au/apps/viewDocument.ac?page=l.

  • Fisher, D. L., Henderson, D., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Interpersonal behaviour in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. L., & Waldrip, B. G. (1997). Assessing culturally sensitive factors in leaning environments of science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 27, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. L., & Waldrip, B. G. (1999). Cultural factors of science classroom learning environments, teacher–student interactions and student outcomes. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environment: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 3–27). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and application. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Science learning environment: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gallard, A. J. (n.d.). Creating multicultural learning environment in science classrooms. Retrieved March 18, 2005, from http://www.educ.sfu.ca/narsite/publicatioms/research/multicultural.htm.

  • Gorsuch, L. C., & Walker, D. E. (1994). Non-verbal communication in the classroom: Anglo teachers and Native American students. Retrieved February 20, 2005, from http://www.native-net.org/archive/ne94b/0042.html.

  • Heppner, F. H., Heppner, M. C., & Leong, Y. P. (1997). Teachers’ estimates of and measurements of students’ reading ability, and readability of text materials in English as a second language secondary biology course. Journal of Applied Research in Education, 1(2), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandt, F. B. (1995). Intercultural bertral communication: An introduction. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O. J. (1994). African cultural and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 3, 357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O. J. (1999). Worldview, collateral learning and the use of science and technology for national development. In M. A. Clements & Y. P. Leong (Eds.), Cultural and language aspects of science, mathematics and technical education (pp. 71–86). Bandar Seri Begawan: University Brunei Darussalam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O. J., & Olajide, J. O. (1995). Wait-time, classroom discourse and the influences of sociocultural factors in science teaching. Science Education, 79, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. B. (1999). Communication in the classroom. Retrieved February 23, 2005, from ERIC ED 436 802.

  • Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2007). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (5th ed.). Wadsworth, CA: Thomas Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurylo, A. D., & Frank, M. G. (2003, May). Human smiles: Expression of emotion or communication gesture? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego.

  • Liberman, M. (2006). Sex and speaking rate. Retrieved September 6, 2010, from http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003423.html.

  • Lindsey, L. L. (2010). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, G. I. (1987). Continuities in communicative patterns in cross cultural classrooms. In B. K. Das (Ed.), Communicating and learning in the classroom community: Anthology series (pp. 37–63). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manusov, V. L., & Patterson, M. L. (2006). The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur-Blair, J. (1995). Gender and diversity: Creating inclusion in the college environment. New Westminster, BC: Ministry of Skills, Labour and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, E. R., Samovar, L. A., & Porter, R. E. (2009). Understanding intercultural communication: The working principle. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication (pp. 6–17). Boston: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • NVCM. (n.d.). Non-verbal communication modes. Retrieved September 24, 2005, from http://www.andrews.edu/-tidwell/lead/689/Nonverbal.html.

  • Rasool, J. A., & Curtis, A. C. (2000). Multicultural education in middle and secondary classrooms: Meeting the challenge of diversity and change. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riah, H., & Sabli. (2005). Assessment of learning environment in agricultural science classes. In H. S. Dhindsa, I. J. Kyeleve, O. Chow, & J. H. S. Q. Perera (Eds.), Future directions in science, mathematics and technical education (pp. 91–100). Brunei: ETC.-Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

  • Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2004). Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal relations (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaizah. (2005). Understandable academic perforamce in science: It it becasue of langauage? In H. S. Dhindsa, I. J. Kyeleve, O. Chow, & J. H. S. Q. Perera (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference (pp. 115–127). Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

  • Rosenthal, J. W. (1996). Teaching science to language minority students: Theory and practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B. (1974). Reflections of wait time: Some methodological questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharizal-Lampoh. (2005). Effects of a constructivist-informed technology rich learning environment on the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

  • She, H. C. (2000). The interplay of a biology teachers’ beliefs, teaching praxis and gender-based students-teacher interaction. Educational Research, 42(1), 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, H. C., & Fisher, D. (2000). The development of questionnaire to describe science teacher communication behaviour in Taiwan and Australia. Science Education, 84, 706–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, H. C., & Fisher, D. (2002). Teacher communication behaviour and its association with students’ cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan and Australia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaldino, J. (2008). Students and sound waves: Five strategies to promote good classroom acoustics. The ASHA Leader, 13(13), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, O. L. (1987). Cross-cultural communication: An essential dimension of effective education. Retrieved March 26, 2009, from http://www.maec.org/cross/index.html.

  • Thomas, E. (2000). Culture and schooling: Building bridges between research, praxis and professionalism. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tartwijk, J. (1993). Sketches of teacher behaviour (in Dutch Docentgedrag in beeld). Utrecht, The Netherlands: W.C.C.

  • Webster, N., & McKechnie, J. L. (1979). Webster’s deleux unbridged dictionary. New York: Dorset & Baber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiting, O. P. D., Sr. (1972). The effect of oral presentation rates on the comprehension scores of slow and average learners. Unpublished dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

  • Wu, M. F. (2004). Problems faced by Chinese learners in L2 English learning and pedagogic recommendations from an inter cultural communication perspective. Karen’s Linguistic Issues. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/problemschinese.html.

  • Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (Eds.). (1993). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, C. S. (2001). Some explanations for the lower performance of students in biology than in other science subjects. In K. Y. Wong, H. H. Tairab, & M. A. Clements (Eds.), Energising science, mathematics and technical education for all (pp. 66–75). Gadong: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., Liberman, M., & Cieri, C. (2006, September). Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation. Paper presented at INTERSPEECH 2006, Pittsburg, PA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei

    Harkirat S. Dhindsa & Salwana Abdul-Latif

Authors
  1. Harkirat S. Dhindsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salwana Abdul-Latif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harkirat S. Dhindsa.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Cultural Communication Learning Environment Questionnaire
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhindsa, H.S., Abdul-Latif, S. Cultural communication learning environment in science classes. Learning Environ Res 15, 37–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9097-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9097-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation