Abstract
Context
Wildlife distributions are often subdivided into discrete conservation units to aid in implementing management and conservation objectives. Habitat suitability models, resistance surfaces, and resistant kernels provide tools for delineating spatially explicit conservation units but guidelines for parameterizing resistant kernels are generally lacking.
Objectives
We used the federally threatened eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) as a case study for calibrating resistant kernels using observed movement data and resistance surfaces to help delineate habitat-based conservation units.
Methods
We simulated eastern indigo snake movements under different resistance surface and resistant kernel parameterizations and selected the scenario that produced simulated movement distances that best approximated the maximum observed annual movement distance. We used our calibrated resistant kernel to model range-wide connectivity and compared delineated conservation units to Euclidean distance-based population units from the recent eastern indigo snake species status assessment (SSA).
Results
We identified a total of 255 eastern indigo snake conservation units, with numerous large (2500–5000 ha of suitable habitat) conservation units across the eastern indigo snake distribution. There was substantial variation in the degree of overlap with the SSA population units likely reflecting the spatial heterogeneity in habitat suitability and landscape resistance.
Conclusion
Our calibration approach is widely applicable to other systems for parameterizing biologically meaningful resistant kernels. Our conservation units can be used to prioritize future eastern indigo snake conservation efforts, identify areas where more survey work is needed, or identify small, isolated populations with high extinction risks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The GIS data used in these analyses are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
R script used in these analyses are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G et al (2003) The application of “least-cost” modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64(4):233–247
Ambrose J, Kirkman LK, Edwards L (eds) (2013) The natural communities of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens
Ash E, Cushman SA, Macdonald DW, Redford T, Kaszta Ż (2020) How important are resistance, dispersal ability, population density and mortality in temporally dynamic simulations of population connectivity? A case study of tigers in southeast Asia. Land 9(11):415
Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2016a) The influence of sex and season on conspecific spatial overlap in a large, actively-foraging colubrid snake. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160033
Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2016b) Seasonal variation in eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) movement patterns and space use in peninsular Florida at multiple temporal scales. Herpetologica 72(3):214–226
Bauder JM, Stevenson DJ, Sutherland CS, Jenkins CL (2017) Occupancy of potential overwintering habitat on protected lands by two imperiled snake species in the coastal plain of the southeastern United States. J Herpetol 51(1):73–88
Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2018) Multi-level, multi-scale habitat selection by a wide-ranging ranging federally threatened snake. Landsc Ecol 33(5):743–763
Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2020) Movement barriers, habitat heterogeneity or both? Testing hypothesized effects of landscape features on home range sizes in eastern indigo snakes. J Zool 311:204–216
Bauder JM, Peterman WE, Spear SF, Jenkins CL, Whiteley AR, McGarigal K (2021) Multiscale assessment of functional connectivity: Landscape genetics of eastern indigo snakes in an anthropogenically fragmented landscape in central Florida. Mol Ecol 30(14):3422–3438
Bauder JM (2019) Population viability and connectivity of the federally threatened eastern indigo snake in central peninsular Florida. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Bradter U, Mair L, Jonsson M, Knape J, Singer A, Snall T (2018) Can opportunistically collected citizen science data fill a data gap for habitat suitability models of less common species? Methods Ecol Evol 9(7):1667–1678
Breininger DR, Legare ML, Bolt RB (2004) Eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi) in Florida: influence of edge on species viability. In: Akcakaya H, Burgman M, Kindvall O et al (eds) Species conservation and management: case studies. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 299–311
Breininger DR, Bolt MR, Legare ML, Drese JH, Stolen ED (2011) Factors influencing home-range sizes of eastern indigo snakes in central Florida. J Herpetol 45(4):484–490
Breininger DR, Mazerolle MJ, Bolt MR, Legare ML, Drese JH, Hines JE (2012) Habitat fragmentation effects on annual survival of the federally protected eastern indigo snake. Anim Conserv 15:361–368
Ceilley DW, Herman JE, Jackson SB et al (2014) Effects of land conversion projects on the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) in south Florida: C-44 reservior site and adjacent lands in Allapattah Flats. Final report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, South Florida Field Office, Vero Beach, Florida. 40 pp., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Agreement No: F11AP00168 DUNS No: 83447051
Chandler HC, Jenkins CL, Bauder JM (2022) Accounting for geographic variation in species-habitat associations during habitat suitability modeling. Ecol Appl 2022:e2504
Chetkiewicz C-LB, Boyce MS (2009) Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. J Appl Ecol 46:1036–1047
Compton BW, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Gamble LR (2007) A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conserv Biol 21(3):788–799
Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15(7):290–295
Crum NJ, Fuller AK, Sutherland CS, Cooch EG, Hurst J (2017) Estimating occupancy probability of moose using hunter survey data. J Wildl Manage 81(3):521–534
Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012a) Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky mountains. Ecol Modell 231:101–112
Cushman SA, Compton BW, McGarigal K (2010) Habitat fragmentation effects depend on complex interactions between population size and dispersal ability: modeling influences of roads, agriculture and residential development across a range of life-history characteristics. In: Cushman SA, andHuettmann F. (eds) Spatially complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, New York
Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2012b) Evaluating the sufficiency of protected lands for maintaining wildlife population connectivity in the U.S. northern Rocky Mountains. Divers Distrib 18:873–884
Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2013) Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American great plains. Biodivers Conserv 22(11):2583–2605
Day CC, Landguth EL, Bearlin A, Holden ZA, Whiteley AR (2018) Using simulation modeling to inform management of invasive species: A case study of eastern brook trout suppression and eradication. Biol Conserv 221:10–22
Elliot NB, Cushman SA, Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ (2014) The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography. J Appl Ecol 51(5):1169–1178
Enge KM, Stevenson DJ, Elliot MJ, Bauder JM (2013) The historical and current distribution of the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi). Herpetol Conserv Biol 8(2):288–307
Fajardo J, Lessmann J, Bonaccorso E, Devenish C, Munoz J (2014) Combined use of systematic conservation planning, species distribution modelling, and connectivity analysis reveals severe conservation gaps in a megadiverse country (Peru). PLoS ONE 9(12):e114367
Fedy BC, Row JR, Oyler-McCance SJ (2017) Integration of genetic and demographic data to assess population risk in a continuously distributed species. Conserv Genet 18(1):89–104
Folt B, Bauder J, Spear S et al (2019) Taxonomic and conservation implications of population genetic admixture, mito-nuclear discordance, and male-biased dispersal of a large endangered snake Drymarchon Couperi. PLoS One 14(3):e0214439
Gonzales EK, Gergel SE (2007) Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis—a tool for invasive species management. Landsc Ecol 22(8):1155–1168
Grimm V, Railsback SF (2012) Pattern-oriented modelling: a “multi-scope” for predictive systems ecology. Phil Trans R Soc Biol Sci 367(1586):298–310
Halstead BJ, Wylie GD, Casazza ML (2014) Ghost of habitat past: historic habitat affects the contemporary distribution of giant garter snakes in a modified landscape. Anim Conserv 17(2):144–153
Hyslop NL, Cooper RJ (2009) Meyers JM (2009) Seasonal shifts in shelter and microhabitat use of Drymarchon couperi (Eastern Indigo Snake) in Georgia. Copeia 3:458–464
Hyslop NL, Meyers JM, Cooper RJ, Stevenson DJ (2014) Effects of body size and sex of Drymarchon couperi (Eastern Indigo Snake) on habitat use, movements, and home range size in Georgia. J Wildl Manage 78(1):101–111
Jackson SB (2013) Home range size and habitat use of the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) at a disturbed agricultural site in south Florida. Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers
Jackson CR, Marnewick K, Lindsey PA, Roskaft E, Robertson MP (2016) Evaluating habitat connectivity methodologies: a case study with endangered African wild dogs in South Africa. Landsc Ecol 31(7):1433–1447
Jones JPG (2011) Monitoring species abundance and distribution at the landscape scale. J Appl Ecol 48(1):9–13
Keeley ATH, Beier P, Gagnon JW (2016) Estimating landscape resistance from habitat suitability: effects of data source and nonlinearities. Landsc Ecol 31(9):2151–2162
Keeley ATH, Beier P, Keeley BW, Fagan ME (2017) Habitat suitability is a poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating movements. Landsc Urban Plan 161:90–102
Koen EL, Bowman J, Walpole AA (2012) The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates. Mol Ecol Resour 12(4):686–696
Larkin JL, Maehr DS, Hoctor TS, Orlando MA, Whitney K (2004) Landscape linkages and conservation planning for the black bear in west-central Florida. Anim Conserv 7(1):23–34
Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85(7):1840–1845
Lowe WH, Allendorf FW (2010) What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol Ecol 19(15):3038–3051
Macdonald DW, Bothwell HM, Kaszta Z et al (2019) Multi-scale habitat modelling identifies spatial conservation priorities for mainland clouded leopards (Neofelis nebulosa). Divers Distrib 25(10):1639–1654
Maiorano L, Chiaverini L, Falco M, Ciucci P (2019) Combining multi-state species distribution models, mortality estimates, and landscape connectivity to model potential species distribution for endangered species in human dominated landscapes. Biol Conserv 237:19–27
McKay L, Bondelid T, Dewald T, Johnston J, Moore R, Rea A (2014) NHDPlus version 2: user guide. United States environmental protection agency, Available from https://nctc.fws.gov/courses/references/tutorials/geospatial/CSP7306/Readings/NHDPlusV2_User_Guide.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2021
McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(50):19885–19890
Mee JA, Bernatchez L, Reist JD, Rogers SM, Taylor EB (2015) Identifying designatable units for intraspecific conservation prioritization: a hierarchical approach applied to the lake whitefish species complex (Coregonus spp). Evolut Applicat 8(5):423–441
Metcalf MF, Gunnels CW IV, Everham EM III, Girimurugan SB, Andreadis P, Herman JE (2021) Movement of the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) in southern Florida, USA. Herpetol Conserv Biol 16(2):425–435
Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Dixo M et al (2009) Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biol Conserv 142(6):1166–1177
Moler PE (1992) Eastern indigo snake. In: Moler PE (ed) Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol III. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, pp 181–186
Moritz C (1999) Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130(3):217–228
Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) (1990) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Florida Press, Orlando, Florida
Nandintsetseg D, Bracis C, Olson KA et al (2019) Challenges in the conservation of wide-ranging nomadic species. J Appl Ecol 56(8):1916–1926
O’Brien D, Manseau M, Fall A, Fortin MJ (2006) Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol Conserv 130(1):70–83
Olsen MT, Andersen LW, Dietz R, Teilmann J, Harkonen T, Siegismund HR (2014) Integrating genetic data and population viability analyses for the identification of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) populations and management units. Mol Ecol 23(4):815–831
Palsboll PJ, Berube M, Allendorf FW (2007) Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol Evol 22:11–17
Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landsc Ecol 25(4):519–532
Rossmanith E, Blaum N, Grimm V, Jeltsch F (2007) Pattern-oriented modelling for estimating unknown pre-breeding survival rates: the case of the lesser spotted woodpecker (Picoides minor). Biol Conserv 135:555–564
Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin M-J, McRae BH, Scribner K (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19:3576–3591
Stevenson DJ, Hyslop NL (2010) Drymarchon couperi (eastern indigo snake) long-distance interpopulation movement. Herpetol Rev 41(1):91–92
Stevenson DJ, Enge KM, Carlile LD et al (2009) An eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) mark-recapture study in southeastern Georgia. Herpetol Conserv Biol 4(1):30–42
Stevenson DJ, Chandler HC (2017) The herpetofauna of conservation lands along the Altamaha River, Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist
Swain HM, Martin PA (2014) Saving the Florida scrub ecosystem: translating science into conservation action. In: Levitt JN (ed) Conservation catalysts: the academy of nature’s agent. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 63–96
Swihart RK, Caudell JN, Brooke JM, Ma Z (2020) A flexible model-based approach to delineate wildlife management units. Wildl Soc Bull 44(1):77–85
Taylor BL, Dizon AE (1999) First policy then science: why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Mol Ecol 8(s1):S11–S16
Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371(6492):65–66
Trainor AM, Walters JR, Morris WF, Sexton J, Moody A (2013) Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers. Landscape Ecol 28(4):755–767
U. S. Census Bureau (2016) 2016 TIGER/Line shapefiles technical documentation. U.S. Census Bureau, Available from https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/data/tiger/tgrshp2016/TGRSHP2016_TechDoc.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2020
U.S. Geological Survey (2020) Protected areas database of the United States. Available from https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/science/pad-us-data-overview?qt-science_center_objects=4#qt-science_center_objectsAccessed 15 June 2020
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2019) Species status assessment report for the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi). U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta
Waldron JL, Welch SM, Bennett SH (2008) Vegetation structure and the habitat specificity of a declining North American reptile: a remnant of former landscapes. Biol Conserv 141:2477–2482
Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15(6):1419–1439
Weckworth BV, Hebblewhite M, Mariani S, Musiani M (2018) Lines on a map: conservation units, meta-population dynamics, and recovery of woodland caribou in Canada. Ecosphere 9(7):e02323
Wiegand T, Jeltsch F, Hanski I, Grimm V (2003) Using pattern-oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application. Oikos 100(2):209–222
With KA, Gardner RH, Turner MG (1997) Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78(1):151–169
Yannic G, St-Laurent M-H, Ortego J et al (2016) Integrating ecological and genetic structure to define management units for caribou in Eastern Canada. Conserv Genet 17(2):437–453
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol 27:777–797
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Beier P, Cushman SA, Vickers TW, Boyce WM (2014) Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study. Landsc Ecol 29(3):541–557
Zeller KA, Vickers TW, Ernest HB, Boyce WM (2017) Multi-level, multi-scale resource selection functions and resistance surfaces for conservation planning: pumas as a case study. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0179570
Zeller KA, Jennings MK, Vickers TW et al (2018) Are all data types and connectivity models created equal? Validating common connectivity approaches with dispersal data. Divers Distrib 24(7):868–879
Zeller KA, Wattles DW, Bauder JM, DeStefano S (2020) Forecasting seasonal habitat connectivity in a developing landscape. Land 9(7):233
Acknowledgements
We thank the many individuals who assisted with various aspects of this project, including Matt Elliott, Kevin Enge, Heidi Hall, Roy King, Benjamin Stegenga, Dirk Stevenson, Charli Thompson, and Marshall Williams. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (grant—F19AC00824), Moody Air Force Base, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Fort Stewart, and the Illinois Natural History Survey provided logistical assistance. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The comments of E. Gustafson and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript.
Funding
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (grant—F19AC00824) and Moody Air Force Base provided funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.M.B. and H.C.C. conceived the original ideas; H.C.C., M.L.E., and C.L.J. secured funding; J.M.B., H.C.C., and M.L.E. compiled the data; J.M.B. and H.C.C. conducted the analysis and led the writing of the manuscript; all authors contributed substantially to revisions and gave final approval for submission and publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Consent for publication
All authors are aware of this submission and consent to this manuscript being published in Landscape Ecology.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bauder, J.M., Chandler, H.C., Elmore, M.L. et al. Incorporating habitat suitability, landscape distance, and resistant kernels to estimate conservation units for an imperiled terrestrial snake. Landsc Ecol 37, 2519–2533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01510-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01510-z