Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incorporating habitat suitability, landscape distance, and resistant kernels to estimate conservation units for an imperiled terrestrial snake

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Wildlife distributions are often subdivided into discrete conservation units to aid in implementing management and conservation objectives. Habitat suitability models, resistance surfaces, and resistant kernels provide tools for delineating spatially explicit conservation units but guidelines for parameterizing resistant kernels are generally lacking.

Objectives

We used the federally threatened eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) as a case study for calibrating resistant kernels using observed movement data and resistance surfaces to help delineate habitat-based conservation units.

Methods

We simulated eastern indigo snake movements under different resistance surface and resistant kernel parameterizations and selected the scenario that produced simulated movement distances that best approximated the maximum observed annual movement distance. We used our calibrated resistant kernel to model range-wide connectivity and compared delineated conservation units to Euclidean distance-based population units from the recent eastern indigo snake species status assessment (SSA).

Results

We identified a total of 255 eastern indigo snake conservation units, with numerous large (2500–5000 ha of suitable habitat) conservation units across the eastern indigo snake distribution. There was substantial variation in the degree of overlap with the SSA population units likely reflecting the spatial heterogeneity in habitat suitability and landscape resistance.

Conclusion

Our calibration approach is widely applicable to other systems for parameterizing biologically meaningful resistant kernels. Our conservation units can be used to prioritize future eastern indigo snake conservation efforts, identify areas where more survey work is needed, or identify small, isolated populations with high extinction risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The GIS data used in these analyses are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

R script used in these analyses are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G et al (2003) The application of “least-cost” modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64(4):233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose J, Kirkman LK, Edwards L (eds) (2013) The natural communities of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens

  • Ash E, Cushman SA, Macdonald DW, Redford T, Kaszta Ż (2020) How important are resistance, dispersal ability, population density and mortality in temporally dynamic simulations of population connectivity? A case study of tigers in southeast Asia. Land 9(11):415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2016a) The influence of sex and season on conspecific spatial overlap in a large, actively-foraging colubrid snake. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2016b) Seasonal variation in eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) movement patterns and space use in peninsular Florida at multiple temporal scales. Herpetologica 72(3):214–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Stevenson DJ, Sutherland CS, Jenkins CL (2017) Occupancy of potential overwintering habitat on protected lands by two imperiled snake species in the coastal plain of the southeastern United States. J Herpetol 51(1):73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2018) Multi-level, multi-scale habitat selection by a wide-ranging ranging federally threatened snake. Landsc Ecol 33(5):743–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR et al (2020) Movement barriers, habitat heterogeneity or both? Testing hypothesized effects of landscape features on home range sizes in eastern indigo snakes. J Zool 311:204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Peterman WE, Spear SF, Jenkins CL, Whiteley AR, McGarigal K (2021) Multiscale assessment of functional connectivity: Landscape genetics of eastern indigo snakes in an anthropogenically fragmented landscape in central Florida. Mol Ecol 30(14):3422–3438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM (2019) Population viability and connectivity of the federally threatened eastern indigo snake in central peninsular Florida. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

  • Bradter U, Mair L, Jonsson M, Knape J, Singer A, Snall T (2018) Can opportunistically collected citizen science data fill a data gap for habitat suitability models of less common species? Methods Ecol Evol 9(7):1667–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breininger DR, Legare ML, Bolt RB (2004) Eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi) in Florida: influence of edge on species viability. In: Akcakaya H, Burgman M, Kindvall O et al (eds) Species conservation and management: case studies. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Breininger DR, Bolt MR, Legare ML, Drese JH, Stolen ED (2011) Factors influencing home-range sizes of eastern indigo snakes in central Florida. J Herpetol 45(4):484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breininger DR, Mazerolle MJ, Bolt MR, Legare ML, Drese JH, Hines JE (2012) Habitat fragmentation effects on annual survival of the federally protected eastern indigo snake. Anim Conserv 15:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceilley DW, Herman JE, Jackson SB et al (2014) Effects of land conversion projects on the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) in south Florida: C-44 reservior site and adjacent lands in Allapattah Flats. Final report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, South Florida Field Office, Vero Beach, Florida. 40 pp., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Agreement No: F11AP00168 DUNS No: 83447051

  • Chandler HC, Jenkins CL, Bauder JM (2022) Accounting for geographic variation in species-habitat associations during habitat suitability modeling. Ecol Appl 2022:e2504

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetkiewicz C-LB, Boyce MS (2009) Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. J Appl Ecol 46:1036–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton BW, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Gamble LR (2007) A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conserv Biol 21(3):788–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15(7):290–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crum NJ, Fuller AK, Sutherland CS, Cooch EG, Hurst J (2017) Estimating occupancy probability of moose using hunter survey data. J Wildl Manage 81(3):521–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012a) Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky mountains. Ecol Modell 231:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Compton BW, McGarigal K (2010) Habitat fragmentation effects depend on complex interactions between population size and dispersal ability: modeling influences of roads, agriculture and residential development across a range of life-history characteristics. In: Cushman SA, andHuettmann F. (eds) Spatially complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2012b) Evaluating the sufficiency of protected lands for maintaining wildlife population connectivity in the U.S. northern Rocky Mountains. Divers Distrib 18:873–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2013) Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American great plains. Biodivers Conserv 22(11):2583–2605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day CC, Landguth EL, Bearlin A, Holden ZA, Whiteley AR (2018) Using simulation modeling to inform management of invasive species: A case study of eastern brook trout suppression and eradication. Biol Conserv 221:10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot NB, Cushman SA, Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ (2014) The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography. J Appl Ecol 51(5):1169–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enge KM, Stevenson DJ, Elliot MJ, Bauder JM (2013) The historical and current distribution of the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi). Herpetol Conserv Biol 8(2):288–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo J, Lessmann J, Bonaccorso E, Devenish C, Munoz J (2014) Combined use of systematic conservation planning, species distribution modelling, and connectivity analysis reveals severe conservation gaps in a megadiverse country (Peru). PLoS ONE 9(12):e114367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fedy BC, Row JR, Oyler-McCance SJ (2017) Integration of genetic and demographic data to assess population risk in a continuously distributed species. Conserv Genet 18(1):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folt B, Bauder J, Spear S et al (2019) Taxonomic and conservation implications of population genetic admixture, mito-nuclear discordance, and male-biased dispersal of a large endangered snake Drymarchon Couperi. PLoS One 14(3):e0214439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales EK, Gergel SE (2007) Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis—a tool for invasive species management. Landsc Ecol 22(8):1155–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Railsback SF (2012) Pattern-oriented modelling: a “multi-scope” for predictive systems ecology. Phil Trans R Soc Biol Sci 367(1586):298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead BJ, Wylie GD, Casazza ML (2014) Ghost of habitat past: historic habitat affects the contemporary distribution of giant garter snakes in a modified landscape. Anim Conserv 17(2):144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop NL, Cooper RJ (2009) Meyers JM (2009) Seasonal shifts in shelter and microhabitat use of Drymarchon couperi (Eastern Indigo Snake) in Georgia. Copeia 3:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop NL, Meyers JM, Cooper RJ, Stevenson DJ (2014) Effects of body size and sex of Drymarchon couperi (Eastern Indigo Snake) on habitat use, movements, and home range size in Georgia. J Wildl Manage 78(1):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SB (2013) Home range size and habitat use of the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) at a disturbed agricultural site in south Florida. Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson CR, Marnewick K, Lindsey PA, Roskaft E, Robertson MP (2016) Evaluating habitat connectivity methodologies: a case study with endangered African wild dogs in South Africa. Landsc Ecol 31(7):1433–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JPG (2011) Monitoring species abundance and distribution at the landscape scale. J Appl Ecol 48(1):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley ATH, Beier P, Gagnon JW (2016) Estimating landscape resistance from habitat suitability: effects of data source and nonlinearities. Landsc Ecol 31(9):2151–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley ATH, Beier P, Keeley BW, Fagan ME (2017) Habitat suitability is a poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating movements. Landsc Urban Plan 161:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen EL, Bowman J, Walpole AA (2012) The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates. Mol Ecol Resour 12(4):686–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin JL, Maehr DS, Hoctor TS, Orlando MA, Whitney K (2004) Landscape linkages and conservation planning for the black bear in west-central Florida. Anim Conserv 7(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85(7):1840–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe WH, Allendorf FW (2010) What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol Ecol 19(15):3038–3051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Bothwell HM, Kaszta Z et al (2019) Multi-scale habitat modelling identifies spatial conservation priorities for mainland clouded leopards (Neofelis nebulosa). Divers Distrib 25(10):1639–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiorano L, Chiaverini L, Falco M, Ciucci P (2019) Combining multi-state species distribution models, mortality estimates, and landscape connectivity to model potential species distribution for endangered species in human dominated landscapes. Biol Conserv 237:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay L, Bondelid T, Dewald T, Johnston J, Moore R, Rea A (2014) NHDPlus version 2: user guide. United States environmental protection agency, Available from https://nctc.fws.gov/courses/references/tutorials/geospatial/CSP7306/Readings/NHDPlusV2_User_Guide.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2021

  • McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(50):19885–19890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mee JA, Bernatchez L, Reist JD, Rogers SM, Taylor EB (2015) Identifying designatable units for intraspecific conservation prioritization: a hierarchical approach applied to the lake whitefish species complex (Coregonus spp). Evolut Applicat 8(5):423–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf MF, Gunnels CW IV, Everham EM III, Girimurugan SB, Andreadis P, Herman JE (2021) Movement of the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) in southern Florida, USA. Herpetol Conserv Biol 16(2):425–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Dixo M et al (2009) Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biol Conserv 142(6):1166–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moler PE (1992) Eastern indigo snake. In: Moler PE (ed) Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol III. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, pp 181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1999) Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130(3):217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) (1990) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Florida Press, Orlando, Florida

  • Nandintsetseg D, Bracis C, Olson KA et al (2019) Challenges in the conservation of wide-ranging nomadic species. J Appl Ecol 56(8):1916–1926

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien D, Manseau M, Fall A, Fortin MJ (2006) Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol Conserv 130(1):70–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen MT, Andersen LW, Dietz R, Teilmann J, Harkonen T, Siegismund HR (2014) Integrating genetic data and population viability analyses for the identification of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) populations and management units. Mol Ecol 23(4):815–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palsboll PJ, Berube M, Allendorf FW (2007) Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol Evol 22:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landsc Ecol 25(4):519–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmanith E, Blaum N, Grimm V, Jeltsch F (2007) Pattern-oriented modelling for estimating unknown pre-breeding survival rates: the case of the lesser spotted woodpecker (Picoides minor). Biol Conserv 135:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin M-J, McRae BH, Scribner K (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19:3576–3591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DJ, Hyslop NL (2010) Drymarchon couperi (eastern indigo snake) long-distance interpopulation movement. Herpetol Rev 41(1):91–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DJ, Enge KM, Carlile LD et al (2009) An eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) mark-recapture study in southeastern Georgia. Herpetol Conserv Biol 4(1):30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DJ, Chandler HC (2017) The herpetofauna of conservation lands along the Altamaha River, Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist

  • Swain HM, Martin PA (2014) Saving the Florida scrub ecosystem: translating science into conservation action. In: Levitt JN (ed) Conservation catalysts: the academy of nature’s agent. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 63–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Caudell JN, Brooke JM, Ma Z (2020) A flexible model-based approach to delineate wildlife management units. Wildl Soc Bull 44(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BL, Dizon AE (1999) First policy then science: why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Mol Ecol 8(s1):S11–S16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371(6492):65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor AM, Walters JR, Morris WF, Sexton J, Moody A (2013) Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers. Landscape Ecol 28(4):755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Census Bureau (2016) 2016 TIGER/Line shapefiles technical documentation. U.S. Census Bureau, Available from https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/data/tiger/tgrshp2016/TGRSHP2016_TechDoc.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2020

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2020) Protected areas database of the United States. Available from https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/science/pad-us-data-overview?qt-science_center_objects=4#qt-science_center_objectsAccessed 15 June 2020

  • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2019) Species status assessment report for the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi). U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron JL, Welch SM, Bennett SH (2008) Vegetation structure and the habitat specificity of a declining North American reptile: a remnant of former landscapes. Biol Conserv 141:2477–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15(6):1419–1439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weckworth BV, Hebblewhite M, Mariani S, Musiani M (2018) Lines on a map: conservation units, meta-population dynamics, and recovery of woodland caribou in Canada. Ecosphere 9(7):e02323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand T, Jeltsch F, Hanski I, Grimm V (2003) Using pattern-oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application. Oikos 100(2):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA, Gardner RH, Turner MG (1997) Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78(1):151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yannic G, St-Laurent M-H, Ortego J et al (2016) Integrating ecological and genetic structure to define management units for caribou in Eastern Canada. Conserv Genet 17(2):437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol 27:777–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Beier P, Cushman SA, Vickers TW, Boyce WM (2014) Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study. Landsc Ecol 29(3):541–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, Vickers TW, Ernest HB, Boyce WM (2017) Multi-level, multi-scale resource selection functions and resistance surfaces for conservation planning: pumas as a case study. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0179570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, Jennings MK, Vickers TW et al (2018) Are all data types and connectivity models created equal? Validating common connectivity approaches with dispersal data. Divers Distrib 24(7):868–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, Wattles DW, Bauder JM, DeStefano S (2020) Forecasting seasonal habitat connectivity in a developing landscape. Land 9(7):233

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the many individuals who assisted with various aspects of this project, including Matt Elliott, Kevin Enge, Heidi Hall, Roy King, Benjamin Stegenga, Dirk Stevenson, Charli Thompson, and Marshall Williams. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (grant—F19AC00824), Moody Air Force Base, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Fort Stewart, and the Illinois Natural History Survey provided logistical assistance. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The comments of E. Gustafson and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript.

Funding

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (grant—F19AC00824) and Moody Air Force Base provided funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.M.B. and H.C.C. conceived the original ideas; H.C.C., M.L.E., and C.L.J. secured funding; J.M.B., H.C.C., and M.L.E. compiled the data; J.M.B. and H.C.C. conducted the analysis and led the writing of the manuscript; all authors contributed substantially to revisions and gave final approval for submission and publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javan M. Bauder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Consent for publication

All authors are aware of this submission and consent to this manuscript being published in Landscape Ecology.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1349 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauder, J.M., Chandler, H.C., Elmore, M.L. et al. Incorporating habitat suitability, landscape distance, and resistant kernels to estimate conservation units for an imperiled terrestrial snake. Landsc Ecol 37, 2519–2533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01510-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01510-z

Keywords

Navigation