Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationships of dead wood patterns with biophysical characteristics and ownership according to scale in Coastal Oregon, USA

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dead wood patterns and dynamics vary with biophysical factors, disturbance history, ownership, and management practices; the relative importance of these factors is poorly understood, especially at landscape to regional scales. This study examined current dead wood amounts in the Coastal Province of Oregon, USA, at multiple spatial scales. Objectives were to: (1) describe current regional amounts of several characteristics of dead wood; (2) compare dead wood amounts across ownerships; (3) determine the relative importance, according to spatial scale, of biophysical and ownership characteristics, to regional dead wood abundance. Dead wood plot data were evaluated with respect to explanatory variables at four spatial scales of resolution: plots, subwatersheds, watersheds and subbasins. The relationships of dead wood characteristics with biophysical attributes and ownership were diverse and scale-specific. Region-wide dead wood abundance and types varied among ownerships, with public lands typically having higher amounts of dead wood and more large dead wood than private lands. Regression analysis of total dead wood volume indicated that ownership was important at the subbasin scale. Growing season moisture stress was important at plot, subwatershed, and watershed scales. Topography was important at the two coarser scales. Multivariate analysis of dead wood gradients showed that ownership was important at all scales, topography at the subbasin scale, historical vegetation at watershed and subbasin scales, and current vegetation at plot and subwatershed scales. Management for dead wood and related biodiversity at watershed to landscape scales should consider the distinct dynamics of snags and logs, the importance of historical effects, and the relevance of ownership patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agee JK (1993) Fire ecology of pacific northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews HJ, Cowlin RW (1940) Forest resources of the Douglas-fir region. Miscellaneous Publication No. 389. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC

  • Bisson PA, Bilby RE, Bryant MD, Dolloff CA, Grette GB, House RA, Murphy ML, Koski KV, Sedell JR (1986) Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. In: Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, pp. 143–190. Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

  • Butler R, Schlaepfer R (2004) Spruce snag quantification by coupling colour infrared aerial photos and a GIS. Forest Ecol Manage 195:325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston KL, Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (1995) Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest. Geomorphology 13:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Dyrness CT (1988) Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale N (2000) The aftermath of tree death: coarse woody debris and the topography in four tropical rain forests. Can J For Res 30:1489–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green P, Peterken GF (1997) Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. Forest Ecol Manage 98:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ (2001) Extent and composition of dead wood in Australian lowland tropical rainforest with different management histories. Forest Ecol Manage 154:35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GWK, Cromack J, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Vol 15. Advances in Ecological Research

  • Harmon ME, Garman SL, Ferrell WK (1996) Modeling historical patterns of tree utilization in the Pacific Northwest: carbon sequestration implications. Ecol Appl 6:641–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RSH, Spies TA (2005) Dynamics of hardwood patches in a conifer matrix: 54 years of change in a forested landscape in Coastal Oregon, USA. Biol Conserv 122:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RSH, Spies TA (2007) An assessment of dead wood patterns and their relationships with biophysical characteristics in two landscapes with different disturbance histories in coastal Oregon (USA). Can J Forest Res 37:940–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krankina ON, Harmon ME, Kukuev YA, Treyfeld RF, Kashpor NN, Kresnov VG, Skudin VM, Protasov NA, Yatskov M, Spycher G, Povarov ED (2002) Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia. Can J Forest Res 32:768–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ (2002) Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (2000) Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems 3:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser C, Tarrant RF, Trappe JM, Franklin JF (1988) From the forest to the sea: a story of fallen trees. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-229. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, OR

  • May CL, Gresswell RE (2003) Large wood recruitment and redistribution in headwater streams in the southern Oregon Coast Range, USA. Can J Forest Res 33:1352–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD 4.33. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN (2003) Landscape patterns of change in coarse woody debris accumulation in an old-growth deciduous forest on the Cumberland Plateau, southeastern Kentucky. Can J Forest Res 33:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ, Spies TA (2007) Influence of environment, disturbance, and ownership on forest vegetation biodiversity of coastal Oregon. Ecol Appl 17:18–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann JL, Spies TA (1998) Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecol Monogr 68:151–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann JL, Waddell KL (2002) Regional patterns of dead wood in forested habitats of Oregon and Washington. In: Laudenslayer WF Jr, Shea PJ, Valentine BE, Weatherspoon CP, Lisle TE (eds) Proceedings of the Symposium on the Ecology and Management of Dead Wood in Western Forests, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp 535–560

  • Pabst RJ, Spies TA (1999) Structure and composition of unmanaged riparian forests in the coastal mountains of Oregon, U.S.A. Can J Forest Res 29:1557–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce KB, Lookingbill T, Urban DL (2005) A simple method for estimating potential relative radiation (PRR) for landscape-scale vegetation analysis. Landsc Ecol 20:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos HM, Camp AE, Gatewood RG, Loomis L (2007) A hierarchical approach for scaling forest inventory and fuels data from local to landscape scales in the Davis Mountains, Texas, USA. Forest Ecol Manage 244:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2004) The SAS System 8.02 for Windows User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner CN (2002) Influence of fire on the dynamics of dead woody material in forests of California and southwestern Oregon. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology and management of dead wood in western forests. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp 445–454

  • Sollins P (1982) Input and decay of coarse woody debris in coniferous stands in western Oregon and Washington. Can J Forest Res 12:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Cline SP (1988) Coarse woody debris in forests and plantations of coastal Oregon. In: Maser C, Tarrant RF, Trappe JM, Franklin JF (eds) From the forest to the sea: a story of fallen trees. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-229. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, OR, pp 5–24

  • Spies TA, McComb BC, Kennedy RSH, McGrath M, Olsen KA, Pabst RJ (2007) Potential effects of forest policies on terrestrial biodiversity in a multi-ownership province. Ecol Appl 17:48–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW (1997) Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl 7:702–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (1997) Canoco for Windows Version 4.5. Biometris—Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological varables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190:214–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker DB, Knight DH (2000) Coarse woody debris following fire and logging in Wyoming lodgepole pine forests. Ecosystems 3:472–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S.D.A. Forest Service and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management (1994) Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents within the range of the Northern Spotted Owl. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service and U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

  • Walker GW, MacLeod NS (1991) Geologic map of Oregon, scale 1:500,000, two sheets. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC, Ohmann JL (2004) A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change. Landsc Ecol 19:631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulder MA, Franklin SE (eds) (2003) Remote sensing of forest environments: concepts and case studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Lisa Ganio for statistical consulting advice, Janet Ohmann and Michael Wimberly for valuable discussions, and Mark Harmon, Julia Jones, and John Hayes for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca S. H. Kennedy.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Weighted mean amount ha−1 and standard error (s.e.) of attributes of dead wood in coastal Oregon and by public and private ownership classes, using plot-scale data. Snag size is dbh, log is led; volume units is m3

Variable

Coastal Province (n = 930)

All Public (n = 511)

All Private (n = 419)

Mean(s.e.)

Mean(s.e.)

Mean(s.e.)

Total dead wood volume >12.5 cm

186.5(6.4)

249.6(10.4)

140.2(7.0)

Total dead wood volume >50.0 cm

132.8(5.8)

188.9(9.8)

91.7(6.0)

Snags

Number of snags >12.5 cm

34.1(2.0)

43.8(2.7)

26.9(3.0)

Number of snags >50 cm

4.7(0.3)

7.9(0.5)

2.3(0.2)

Number of snags >50 cm and >15 m tall

0.6(0.1)

1.2(0.1)

0.2(0.1)

Volume of snags >12.5 cm

26.3(1.7)

44.3(3.0)

13.0(1.5)

Volume of snags >50 cm

19.6(1.6)

35.5(2.9)

8.0(1.3)

Volume of snags 12.5–25.0 cm

2.6(0.2)

3.2(0.3)

2.2(0.3)

Volume of snags 25.0–50.0 cm

4.0(0.3)

5.7(0.5)

2.8(0.4)

Volume of snags 50.0–75.0 cm

3.0(0.3)

5.4(0.5)

1.2(0.2)

Volume of snags 75.0–100.0 cm

4.2(0.4)

7.3(0.7)

2.0(0.4)

Volume of snags >100.0 cm

12.4(1.3)

22.8(2.4)

4.8(1.0)

Snag biomass (Mg)

7.4(0.5)

12.5(0.9)

3.7(0.5)

Snag carbon (Mg C)

3.9(0.3)

6.5(0.5)

1.9(0.2)

Number of legacy snags >12.5 cm

1.4(0.1)

1.9(0.2)

1.0(0.1)

Volume of legacy snags >12.5 cm

7.1(0.8)

10.0(1.3)

5.1(1.0)

% of all snags >12.5 cm, legacy

19.9(1.4)

22.0(2.2)

18.3(1.8)

Logs

Volume of logs >12.5 cm

160.2(5.7)

205.2(9.2)

127.2(6.5)

Volume of logs >25 cm

149.0(5.6)

194.8(9.1)

115.3(6.3)

Volume of logs >50 cm

113.2(5.1)

153.4(8.5)

83.7(5.6)

Volume of logs 12.5–25.0 cm

11.3(0.4)

10.4(0.6)

11.8(0.5)

Volume of logs 25.0–50.0 cm

35.8(1.1)

41.4(1.7)

31.6(1.4)

Volume of logs 50.0–75.0 cm

40.1(1.7)

49.1(2.7)

33.5(2.2)

Volume of logs 75.0–100.0 cm

34.2(2.1)

50.3(3.8)

22.4(2.0)

Volume of logs >100.0 cm

38.9(3.2)

54.0(5.5)

27.8(3.3)

Log biomass(Mg)

44.2(1.6)

54.4(2.4)

36.8(1.9)

Log carbon(Mg C)

23.0(0.8)

28.3(1.3)

19.1(1.0)

Volume of legacy logs >12.5 cm

55.2(3.3)

63.4(5.0)

49.2(4.3)

Legacy logs, % of all >12.5 cm logs

21.9(1.0)

20.2(1.3)

23.1(1.4)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, R.S.H., Spies, T.A. & Gregory, M.J. Relationships of dead wood patterns with biophysical characteristics and ownership according to scale in Coastal Oregon, USA. Landscape Ecol 23, 55–68 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9164-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9164-9

Keywords

Navigation