Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A survey of the effect of cryogenic treatment and natural ageing on structural changes and second-phase precipitation in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the impacts of shallow cryogenic (−40 °C) and natural ageing treatments on the precipitation of the second phases in a 7xxx alloy were investigated. Using the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis technique, transformation temperatures of the phases both in standard natural aged and naturally aged after cryogenic treatment were determined. As a result of the analyses made, the activation energies of the precipitates formed in the material were calculated with the Kissinger, Takhor and Augis-Bennett equations and their effects on diffusion were considered. With DSC analysis, nucleation characteristics of the η′ phase (MgZn2) were determined by the Avrami parameter from the Ozawa equation. Also, features and distributions of different types of precipitates were analysed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques, respectively. Particularly, during the cryogenic and natural ageing processes, dislocation densities, strain values of the planes, texture coefficients and so subsequent after effects on the crystal structure were assessed. It was anticipated that excess dislocations generated during sub-zero treatment preferably settled on suitable planes to subside the strain energy. Finally, it was noticed that compared to natural aged samples, application of the cryogenic treatment before ageing upsurged the hardness of the material on the average by15%. This was possibly because of the η′ precipitates nucleated mainly on dislocations.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirsch J. Recent development in aluminium for automotive applications. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2014;24(7):1995–2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63305-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kodetová V, Vlach M, Kudrnová H, Leibner M, Málek J, Cieslar M, Neubert V. Annealing effects in commercial aluminium hot-rolled 7075 (–Sc–Zr) alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;142(5):1613–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10249-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao H, Gault B, Ponge D, Raabe D. Reversion and re-aging of a peak aged Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Scr Mater. 2020;188:296–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.07.049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Omer K, Abolhasani A, Kim S, Nikdejad T, Butcher C, Wells M, Worswick M. Process parameters for hot stamping of AA7075 and D-7xxx to achieve high performance aged products. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;257:170–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu S, Li C, Han S, Deng Y, Zhang X. Effect of natural aging on quench-induced inhomogeneity of microstructure and hardness in high strength 7055 aluminum alloy. J Alloy Compd. 2015;625:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Erhard H. Hundred years of precipitation hardening. J Light Met. 2001;1(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-5317(01)00006-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leacock AG, Howe C, Brown D, Lademo OG, Deering A. Evolution of mechanical properties in a 7075 Al-alloy subject to natural ageing. Mater Des. 2013;49:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayer R, Koo JY, Steeds JW, Park BK. Microanalytical study of the heterogeneous phases in commercial Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Metall Trans A. 1985;16(11):1925–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deschamps A, Bley F, Livet F, Fabregue D, David L. In-situ small-angle X-ray scattering study of dynamic precipitation in an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Philos Mag. 2003;83(6):677–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141861021000051091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dehghani K, Nekahi A, Mirzaie MAM. Optimizing the bake hardening behavior of Al7075 using response surface methodology. Mater Des. 2010;31(4):1768–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dlubek G, Krause R, Brümmer O, Plazaola F. Study of formation and reversion of Guinier-Preston zones in Al-4.5 at % Zn-x at % Mg alloys by positrons. J Mater Sci. 1986;21(3):853–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01117364.

  12. Berg LK, Gjønnes J, Hansen VX, Li XZ, Knutson-Wedel M, Schryvers D, Wallenberg LR. GP-zones in Al–Zn–Mg alloys and their role in artificial aging. Acta Mater. 2001;49(17):3443–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00251-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung TF, Yang YL, Huang BM, Shi Z, Lin J, Ohmura T, Yang JR. Transmission electron microscopy investigation of separated nucleation and in-situ nucleation in AA7050 aluminium alloy. Acta Mater. 2018;149:377–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Löffler H, Kovács I, Lendvai J. Decomposition processes in Al-Zn-Mg alloys. J Mater Sci. 1983;18(8):2215–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou S, Zhang D, Ding Q, Zhang J, Zhuang L. Solute clustering and precipitation of Al-5.1 Mg-0.15 Cu-xZn alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;759:465–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.05.066

  16. Ozer M, Dalli K, Ozer A. Effect of ball-burnishing on surface integrity and fatigue behaviour of 7175–T6 AA. Mater Sci Technol. 2023;39(2):248–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2022.2142744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Inoue H, Sato T, Kojima Y, Takahashi T. The temperature limit for GP zone formation in an Al-Zn-Mg alloy. Metall Mater Trans A. 1981;12(8):1429–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02643687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen J, Zhen L, Yang S, Shao W, Dai S. Investigation of precipitation behavior and related hardening in AA 7055 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;500(1–2):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin YC, Jiang YQ, Zhang JL, Chen XM. Influence of stress-aging processing on precipitates and mechanical properties of a 7075 aluminum alloy. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20(1):1700583. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu X, Zheng J, Li Z, Luo R, Chen B. Precipitation in an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy during isothermal aging: atomic-scale HAADF-STEM investigation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;691:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen V, Karlsen OB, Langsrud Y, Gjønnes J. Precipitation and strengthening in aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2004;20(2):185–93. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708304225010424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lendvai J. Precipitation and strengthening in aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Forum. 1996;217:43–56. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.217-222.43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sha G, Cerezo A. Early-stage precipitation in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy (7050). Acta Mater. 2004;52(15):4503–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, Hu R, Zheng J, Zhang Y, Ding Z, Liu W, Sha G. Formation of solute nanostructures in an Al–Zn–Mg alloy during long-term natural aging. J Alloy Compd. 2020;821:153572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chatterjee A, Qi L, Misra A. In situ transmission electron microscopy investigation of nucleation of GP zones under natural aging in Al-Zn-Mg alloy. Scr Mater. 2022;207:114319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalfallah A, Raho AA, Amzert S, Djemli A. Precipitation kinetics of GP zones, metastable η′ phase and equilibrium η phase in Al—5.46 wt.% Zn—1.67 wt.% Mg alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2019;29(2):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)64932-0

  27. Schneider R, Heine B, Grant RJ, Zouaoui Z. Mechanical behaviour of aircraft relevant aluminium wrought alloys at low temperatures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl. 2015;229(2):126–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420713501734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan S, Cheng W, Liu W, Xu Y. A novel deep drawing process for aluminum alloy sheets at cryogenic temperatures. J Mater Process Technol. 2020;284:116743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin X, Deng W, Zou Y, Zhang J. Ultrafine grained Al 7075 alloy fabricated by cryogenic temperature large strain extrusion machining combined with aging treatment. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;762:138106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem. 1957;29(11):1702–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Takhor RL. Advances in nucleation and crystallization of glasses. Am Ceram Soc Columb. 1971;166:10–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Augis JA, Bennett JE. Calculation of the avrami parameters for heterogeneous solid state reactions using a modification of the kissinger method. J Therm Anal. 1978;13(2):283–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hulett JR. Deviations from the arrhenius equation. Q Rev Chem Soc. 1964;18(3):227–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/QR9641800227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Taskesen A, Aksoz S, Ozdemir A. The effect of cryogenic treatment on ageing behaviour of B4C reinforced 7075 aluminium composite. Kovove Mater-Met Mater. 2017;55(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.4149/km_2017_1_57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Davis JR. Aluminum and aluminum alloys. ASM International. 1993;3:534–642.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Warren BE. X-ray diffraction. Courier Corporation. 1990;1:7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Harris GBX. Quantitative measurement of preferred orientation in rolled uranium bars. The Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1952;43(336):113–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440108520972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smallman RE. Modern physical metallurgy. 2016;4:385–491.

  39. Holzwarth U, Gibson N. The Scherrer equation versus the ’Debye-Scherrer equation. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(9):534–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Williamson GK, Hall WH. X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram. Acta Metall. 1953;1(1):22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hansen N. Hall-Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr Mater. 2004;51(8):801–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Martin JW. Micromechanisms in particle-hardened alloys. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ozawa T. Kinetic analysis of derivative curves in thermal analysis. J Therm Anal. 1970;2(3):301–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01911411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Papazian JM. Calorimetric studies of precipitation and dissolution kinetics in aluminum alloys 2219 and 7075. Metall Trans A. 1982;13(5):761–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02642389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fanfoni M, Tomellini M. The johnson-mehl-avrami-kohnogorov model: a brief review. Il Nuovo Cimento D. 1998;20(7):1171–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Callister JR, William D, David G. Rethwisch. Fundamentals of materials science and engineering an integrated approach. 2020;261–79.

  47. Altuntaş G, Altuntaş O, Bostan B. Characterization of Al-7075/T651 alloy by RRA heat treatment and different pre-deformation effects. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2021;74(12):3025–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02369-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Altuntaş G, Bostan B. Metallurgical characterization of natural aging effects on pre-deformed Al 7075/T651 alloy during retrogression and re-aging heat treatment. Kovove Mater-Met Mater. 2022;60(4):209–222. https://doi.org/10.31577/km.2022.4.209.

  49. Guo W, Guo J, Wang J, Yang M, Li H, Wen X, Zhang. Evolution of precipitate microstructure during stress aging of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;634:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.047.

  50. Gao M, Feng CR, Wei RP. An analytical electron microscopy study of constituent particles in commercial 7075–T6 and 2024–T3 alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 1998;29(4):1145–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-998-0240-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been financially supported by the Gazi University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [under Project Number FGA-2023-8195].

Funding

This study was funded by Gazi Üniversitesi, FDK-2023-7620, Bülent Bostan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technology, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    Gözde Altuntaş, Abbas Tamer Özdemir & Bülent Bostan

Authors
  1. Gözde Altuntaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbas Tamer Özdemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bülent Bostan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gözde Altuntaş.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altuntaş, G., Özdemir, A.T. & Bostan, B. A survey of the effect of cryogenic treatment and natural ageing on structural changes and second-phase precipitation in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 10713–10725 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12414-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12414-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation