Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of hazardous reactions under extreme conditions with a house-built high-performance adiabatic calorimeter

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continuous emergence of new materials and chemical processes has posed great challenge on the hazard assessment capacity, especially the capacity to mimic the reaction progress and to measure the heat released. Although a few thermal hazard screening tools are readily available, a flexible yet cost-effective adiabatic calorimeter that could be applied under extreme conditions is still missing. A house-built high-performance adiabatic calorimeter (HPAC) was developed to solve the problem. We validated the HPAC by comparing its performance with a commercially available Vent Sizing Package 2 in the measurement of H2O2 decomposition and Di-t-butyl peroxide decomposition. We then demonstrated the capability of the HPAC by successfully evaluating the thermal runaway and overpressure hazard of a residual oil hydrotreating reaction under high temperature and high pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CAS REGISTRY. http://www.cas.org/content/chemical-substances. Accessed 04 Feb 2019.

  2. Iwata Y, Koseki H. Risk evaluation on the basis of pressure rate measured by automatic pressure tracking adiabatic calorimeter. J Hazard Mater. 2008;159(1):35–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ARC. http://www.thermalhazardtechnology.com. Accessed 04 Feb 2019.

  4. VSP2. https://www.fauske.com/. Accessed 04 Feb 2019.

  5. Dewar. http://www.chilworth.co.uk. Accessed 04 Feb 2019.

  6. Phitech. http://www.helgroup.com. Accessed 04 Feb 2019.

  7. Askonas CF, Burelbach JP, Leung JC. The versatile VSP2: a tool for adiabatic thermal analysis and vent sizing applications. In: North American thermal analysis society, 28th annual conference, Orlando, 2000.

  8. Li X-R, Koseki H. Study on the early stage of runaway reaction using Dewar vessels. J Loss Prevent Proc. 2005;18(4–6):455–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin WH, Wu SH, Shiu GY, Shieh SS, Shu CM. Self-accelerating decomposition temperature (SADT) calculation of methyl ethyl ketone peroxide using an adiabatic calorimeter and model. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;95(2):645–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu S-H, Chi J-H, Huang C-C. Thermal hazard analyses and incompatible reaction evaluation of hydrogen peroxide by DSC. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;102(2):563–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shu C-M, Yang Y-J. Using VSP2 to separate catalytic and self-decomposition reactions for hydrogen peroxide in the presence of hydrochloric acid. Thermochim Acta. 2002;392–393:259–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu P, Liu X, Kubota S, Huang P, Wada Y. Thermal oxidation process and characteristic of abietic acid and gum rosin by accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC). J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138(1):479–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei JM, You ML, Chu YC, Shu CM. Evaluation of thermal hazard for lauroyl peroxide by VSP2 and TAM III. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109(3):1237–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang HC, Lin WC, Hua M, Pan XH, Shu CM, Jiang JC. Analysis of thermal stability and pyrolysis kinetic of dibutyl phosphate-based ionic liquid through thermogravimetry, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138(1):489–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun F, Zhang F, Jin M-P. Vent sizing of cumene hydroperoxide (CHP) system under fire scenario considering emergency flooding measure. J Loss Prevent Proc. 2014;32:230–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kersten RJA, Boers MN, Stork MM. Results of a Round-Robin with di-tertiary-butyl peroxide in various adiabatic equipment for assessment of runaway reaction hazards. J Loss Prevent Proc. 2005;18(3):145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Speight JG. Chapter 4: Hydrotreating and desulfurization. In: Heavy and extra-heavy oil upgrading technologies. Boston: Gulf Professional Publishing; 2013. p. 69–94.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support received from the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0301701) and the Chinese State Key Laboratory of Chemical Safety. The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Sun.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 866 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Sun, B., Jiang, J. et al. Measurement of hazardous reactions under extreme conditions with a house-built high-performance adiabatic calorimeter. J Therm Anal Calorim 143, 3817–3823 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09289-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09289-4

Keywords

Navigation