Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Synthesis, chemical characterization and radiological response of Ho and HoZr bioglass seeds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work aims to study the synthesis and characterization of Ho and HoZr bioglass seeds, in addition to radiological response with the contrast agent Zr incorporated. The cylindrical seeds, identified also as [Si:Ca:Ho] and [Si:Ca:Ho:Zr], were synthesized by the sol–gel method and coated with acrylic resin and polyvinyl alcohol membrane . Analysis of the mass attenuation coefficients of Ho and Zr according to the medical X-ray spectrum was performed. The synthesized bioglasses were characterized by quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating the main elemental composition. The following characterization techniques were performed: UV–Vis spectrometry, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDS) and X-ray fluorescence with CdTe detector and americium excitation source (Am-241). As results, seeds were synthesized and coated within the two established dimensions of 0.35 ± 0.05 and 0.65 ± 0.05 mm diameters and 1.50 ± 0.10 and 1.57 ± 0.05 mm lengths. The Ho composition was 30.7 % and Zr 22.2 % on [Si:Ca:Ho:Zr] seeds. The mass attenuation coefficient of zirconium showed to be eightfold superior to the holmium within the medical diagnosis spectra. Radiological response of [Si:Ca:Ho:Zr] seeds showed 20 % higher contrast compared to [Si:Ca:Ho], within a background equivalent to breast glandular tissue, resulting in an appropriate radiological visibility of [Si:Ca:Ho:Zr]. As conclusion, the characterization methods have identified their elemental composition. Insertion of Zr in the synthesis has increased the radiological contrast, allowing implant’s monitoring by conventional X-ray or mammogram.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hench LL, West JK (1990) The sol–gel process. Am Chem Soc Chem Rev. doi:10.1021/cr00099a003

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cao W, Hench LL (1996) Bioactive materials. Ceram Int. doi:10.1016/0272-8842(95)00126-3

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira MM, Orefice RL, Mansur HS, Lopes MT, Turchetti-Maia RM, Vasconcelos AC (2003) Preparation and biocompatibility of poly (methyl methacrylate) reinforced with bioactive particles. Mater Res. doi:10.1590/S1516-14392003000300002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nogueira LB, Campos TPR (2011) Nuclear characterization and investigation of radioactive bioglass seed surfaces for brachytherapy via scanning electron microscopy. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s10971-010-2385-4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roberto WS, Pereira MM, Campos TPR (2003) Analysis of bioactive glasses obtained by sol–gel processing goes radioactive implants. Mater Res. doi:10.1590/S1516-14392003000200003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roberto WS, Pereira MM, Campos TPR (2003) Structure and dosimetric analysis of biodegradable glasses for prostatic cancer treatment. Artif Organs. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.07253.x

    Google Scholar 

  7. Valente ES, Campos TPR (2010) Gamma spectrometry and chemical characterization of ceramic seeds with samarium-153 and holmium-166 for brachytherapy proposal. Appl Radiat Isot. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.07.011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Valente ES, Cuperschmid EM, Campos TPR (2011) Evaluation of HeLa cell lineage response to beta radiation from holmium-166 embedeed in ceramic seeds. Braz Arch Biol Technol. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132011000500013

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nogueira LB, Campos TPR (2012) Radiological response of ceramics and polymeric devices for breast brachytherapy. Appl Radiat Isot. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.01.006

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donanzam BA, Campos TPR, Dalmázio I, Valente ES (2013) Synthesis and characterization of calcium phosphate loaded with Ho-166 and Sm-153: a novel biomaterial for treatment of spine metastases. J Mater Sci. doi:10.1007/s10856-013-5024-0

    Google Scholar 

  11. Casciato DA, Lowitz BB (1991) Manual of clinical oncologia, 2nd edn. Medsi, Rio de Janeiro, pp 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scaff LAM (2010) Physics in radiotherapy: the analogical base of a digital age. Projeto Saber, São Paulo, SP

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nogueira LB (2009) Investigation of radiological visibility of ceramic and polymeric devices for brachytherapy. Dissertation, Postgraduate Program in Nuclear Sciences and Techniques, Department of Nuclear Engineering, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

  14. Rocha FRP, Teixeira LSG (2004) Strategies for increased sensitivity in the UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Quím Nova. doi:10.1590/S0100-40422004000500021

    Google Scholar 

  15. Skoog DA, Holler F, Nieman TA (2002) Instrumental analysis principles, 5th edn. Bookman, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalmázio I, Duarte LO, CAMPOS TPR (2010) Development of a method for quantification of holmium and samarium in bioglasses seeds using UV–VIS spectrophotometry. In: VI American Latin Congress of Artificial Organs and Biomaterials (COLAOB), Gramado, RS, Brazil

  17. Nagata N, Bueno MI, Peralta-zamora PG (2001) Mathematical methods for correction of spectral interferences and effects inter-elements in quantitative analysis by X-ray fluorescence. Quím Nova. doi:10.1590/S0100-40422001000400015

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dedavid BA, Gomes CI, Machado G (2007) Scanning electron microscopy: applications and sample preparation: polymeric, metal and semiconductor materials. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, pp 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  19. Firestone RB, Shirley VS, Baglin CM, Chu SYF, Zipkin J (1996) Table of isotopes. Wiley. ISBN 0471-14918-7, 2 volume print set/3,168 p. http://ie.lbl.gov/toibook.html. Accessed 20 July 2015

  20. Amptek- operating manual (2008) XR-100CR/X-ray detector & preamplifier. Amptek Inc., Bedford, MA, USA. http://www.amptek.com/pdf/xr100cr.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2015

  21. Valente ED (2010) Radioactive ceramic seeds with Ho-166 and Sm-153 with perspective of use in brachytherapy. PhD Thesis, Program in Nuclear Sciences and Techniques, Department of Nuclear Engineering, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG

  22. Dimenstein R, Belfer AJ (2005) Practical guide to artifacts in mammography: how to identify them and avoid them, 2nd edn. SENAC, São Paulo, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dowsett DJ, Kenny PA, Johnston RE (1998) The physics of diagnostic imaging. Chapman & Hall, London, p 656

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Microscopy Center of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) and the “Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa Cientifica e Tecnologica”—CNPq Process No. 456719/2013-0, Call 57/2013 MCTI/CNPq/MS—SCTIE—DECIT—“Rede Brasileira de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde: Pesquisa de Efetividade Comparativa” (PEC-REBRATS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Batista Nogueira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nogueira, L.B., Campos, T.P.R. Synthesis, chemical characterization and radiological response of Ho and HoZr bioglass seeds. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 77, 688–698 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3900-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3900-4

Keywords

Navigation