Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of distribution coefficient of polonium in geological matrices around uranium mining site

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In case of ground (groundwater) contamination or contaminants release from the disposal modules (facilities) to the geo-environment, the fate of contaminant transport is mainly governed by the parameter called distribution (partition) coefficient, K d. It is a measure of sorption of contaminants to soils. For that the sorption of polonium in soil were carried out using laboratory batch method in different soil samples collected from different places around Turamdih uranium mining site. The kinetics of polonium sorption were also carried out at different time intervals which clearly indicates that sorption equilibrium for polonium achieved at around 72 h. The K d for polonium varies from 1,443 to 7,501.3 L/kg in soil samples. Chemical characterization of soil and ground water samples were carried out to know the effect of various chemical parameters with distribution coefficient of polonium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vandenhove H, Gil-Garcia C, Rigol A, Vidal M (2009) J Environ Radioact 100:697–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelouas A (2006) Elements 2:335–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2003) Extent of environmental contamination by Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) and Technological Options for Remediation. Technical report series 419, STI/DOC/010/419, ISBN 92-0-112503-8

  4. Amaral ECS, Carvalho ZL, Godoy JM (1992) Radiat Prot Dosim 24:119–121

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nair RN, Faby S, Manikandan ST (2010) Appl Math Model 34:2300–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanns M (1984) Fresenius J Anal Chem 319(4):357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy WR, Drapac IG, Chou SFJ, Griffin RA (1991) Batch-type procedures for estimating soil adsorption of chemicals. EPA/530-SW-87-006-F, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  8. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1991) Site characterization for subsurface remediation. EPA/625/4-91/026, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH

  9. Acharya GD, Hathi MV, Patel AD, Parmar KC (2008) E-J Chem 5:792–796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marbaniang DG, Raj PK, Phils N, Darlando KT (2010) Environ Monit Assess 162:347–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seilsepour M, Rashidi M (2008) American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 3:365–369

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zuoping Z, Tetsu TK, Jiamin W (2003) Environ Sci Technol 37:5603–5608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hepper EN, Buschiazzo DE, Hevia GG, Urioste A, Anton L (2006) Geoderma 135:216–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen WR, Watters RL (1971) Soil Sci 112:145–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mishra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maity, S., Mishra, S., Bhalke, S. et al. Estimation of distribution coefficient of polonium in geological matrices around uranium mining site. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 290, 75–79 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1135-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1135-6

Keywords

Navigation