Abstract
Ultrasonicaton has proved to be a highly advantageous method for depolymerizing macromolecules because it reduces their molecular weight simply by splitting the most susceptible chemical bond without causing any changes in the chemical nature of the polymer. Solution of poly (vinyl-pyrrolidone) in chloroform with different concentrations and different molecular weights at a fined temperature were subjected to ultrasonic degradation. This study confirms the general assumption that the shear forces generated by the rapid motion of the solvent following cavitational collapse are responsible for the breakage of the chemical bonds within the polymer. A method of viscometry was used to study the degradation behavior and kinetic model was developed to estimate the degradation rate constant. The results were indicated that the polymers with height molecular mass degraded faster than the polymers laving low molecular mass thus the rate of ultrasonic degradation increased with increasing molecular weight. It was found that rate constant decreases as the concentration increases. The calculated rate constants correlated in terms of inverse concentration and relative viscosity of PVP solutions. This behavior in the rate of degradation was interpreted in terms of viscosity and concentration of polymer solution. The effect of polymer concentration can be interpreted in terms of the increase in viscosity with concentration, causing the molecules to become less mobile in solution and the velocity gradients around the collapsing bubbles to therefore become smaller and it causes a reduction in the cavitation efficiency thus, the rate of degradation will be decreased. The experimental results show that the viscosity of polymers decreased with ultrasonic irradiation time and approached a limiting value, below which no further degradation took place.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Madras G, Chattopadhyay S (2001) Effect of benzoyl peroxide on the ultrasonic degradation of poly (vinyl acetate), polym. Degrad. Stab. 73:33–38 doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00064-7
Price GJ, West PJ, Smith PF (1994) Control of polymer structure using power ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 1:51–57 doi:10.1016/1350-4177(94)90028-0
Shen S, Yang M, Ran S, Xu F, Wang Z (2006) Preparation and properties of Natural Rubber/Polygorskite composites by Co-Coagulating Rubber Latex and clay Aqueous suspension. J Polym Res 13:469–473 doi:10.1007/s10965-006-9068-4
Zheng XT, Wu DM, Meng QY, Wang KJ, Liu Y, Wan L, Ren DY (2008) Mechanical properties of low- density polyethylene/nanomagnesium hydroxide composites prepared by an in situ bubble stretching method. J Polym Res 15:59–65 doi:10.1007/s10965-007-9141-7
Price GJ (1990) The use of ultrasound for the controlled degradation of polymer solutions. In: Mason T J (Ed.) Advances in sonochemistry. 1 231–285.
G. J. Price (1992) In: G.l price, Editor. Current Trends in sonochemisty, R. S.C.; special publication 116. Cambridge: R.S.C. P.87.
In: H.H.G.Jellinek, Editer, Degradation of vinyl polymers, Academic press, New York. (1955)
Price GJ, Smith PF (1993) Ultrasonic degradation of polymer solutions. 2. The effect of temperature, ultrasound intensity and dissolved gases on polystyrene in toluene. Polymer 34:4111–4117
Chakrabortly J, Sarkar J, Kumar R, Madras G (2004) Ultrasonic degradation of polybutadiene and isotactic polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stabil 85:555–558 doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.021
Price GJ, Norris DJ, West PJ (1992) Polymerization of methyl methacrylate initiated by ultrasound. Macromolecules 25:6447–6454 doi:10.1021/ma00050a010
Koda S, Mori H, Matsumoto K, Nomura H (1993) Ultrasonic degradation, of water soluble polymers. Polymer 34:30–36
Malhotra SL (1982) Ulttasonic solution degradations of polystyrene and substituted polystyrenes in tetrahydrofuran as solvent. J. Macromol. Sci. Chem 17:4–12 doi:10.1080/00222338208062411
Grönross A, Pirkonen P, Ruppert O (2004) Ultrasonic depolymerization of aqueous carboxymethylcellulose. Ultrason Sonochem 11:9–12 doi:10.1016/S1350-4177(03)00129-9
Vijayalakshmi SP, Madras G (2004) Polym Degrad Stab 84:341
Sivalingam G, Madrass G (2004) Effect of temperature on the ultrasonic degradation of polyacrylamide and poly(ethylene oxide). Polym Degrad Stabil 84:341–344 doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(04)00046-1
Weissler A (1950) Depolymerization by Ultrasonic Irradiation: The Role of Cavitation. J Appl Phys 21:171–176 doi:10.1063/1.1699618
Kanwul F, Liggat JJ, Pethrick RA (2000) Ultrasonic degradation of polystyrene solutions. Polym Degrad Stabil 68:445–449 doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00034-3
Mason TJ (1991) Chemistry with ultrasound. Elsevier Applied science, London and NewYork
Doulah MS (1978) A proposed mechanism for the degradation of addition polymers in cavitating ultrasonic fields. J Appl Polym Sci 22:1735–1743 doi:10.1002/app.1978.070220622
Tayal A, Khan S (2000) Degradation of a Water-Soluble Polymer: Molecular Weight Changes and Chain Scission Characteristics. Macromolecules 33:9488–9493 doi:10.1021/ma000736g
Madras G, Chattopadhyay S (2001) Effect of solvent on the ultrasonic degradation of poly(vinyl acetate). Polym Degrad Stabil 71:273–278 doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00174-9
Mason TJ, Peters D (2002) Practical Sonochemistry. Power Ultrasound uses and Applications, second ed. Horwood Publications Limited, Chicherster
Price GJ, West PJ (1996) Ultrasonic production of block copolymers as situ compatibilizzer for polymer mixtures. J. Polym 37:3975–3978 doi:10.1016/0032-3861(96)00107-3
Lebovitz AH, Gray KM, Chem CA, Torkelson MJ (2003) Interpolymer radical coupling reactions during sonication of polymer solutions. Polymer (Guildf) 44:2823–2828 doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00225-8
Delos SE, Gonzalez MJL, Gonzalez M (1998) Gonzalez Conception, Modification of polypropylene with maleic anhydride: Ultrasonic irradiation effects. J Appl Polym Sci 68:45–52 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980404)68:1<45::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-N
Taghizadeh MT, Mehrdad A (2003) Calculation of the rate constant for the ultrasonic degradation of aqueous solutions of polyvinyl alcohol by viscometry. Ultrason Sonochem 10:309–313 doi:10.1016/S1350-4177(03)00110-X
Xiuyvan N, Yuefang H, Boillin L, Xi X (2001) Mechanical degradation and mechanochemical copolymerization of hydroxyethyl cellulose. Eur Polym J 37:201–206 doi:10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00153-1
Kanwal F, Liggat JJ, Pethrick RA (2000) Ultrasonic degradation of polystyrene solution. Polym Degrad Stabil 68:445–449 doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00034-3
Madras G, Chung GY, Smith JM, Mccoy BJ (1997) Molecular Weight Effect on the Dynamics of Polystyrene Degradation Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36:2019–2024 doi:10.1021/ie9607513
Hsu SH, Whu SW, Tsai CL, Wu YH, Chen HW, Hsieh KH (2004) Chitosan as scaffold Materials: Effects of Molecular weight and Degree of Deacetylation. J Polym Res 11:141–147 doi:10.1023/B:JPOL.0000031080.70010.0b
Nguyen TQ, Liang Q2, Kausch HH (1997) Kinetics of ultrasonic and transient elongational flow degradation: a comparative study. Polymer (Guildf) 38:3783−3793 doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00950-0
Ederer HJ, Basedow AM, Ebert KH (1990) Modeling of chemical reaction systems. In: Ebert KH, Deuflhand P, Jagger W (eds) Springer- werlag, Berlin, pp 189–195
Price GJ (1990) The use of ultrasound for the controlled degradation of polymer solutions. Adv. Sonochem. 1:231–287
Florea M (1993) New use of size exclusion chromatography in kinetics of mechanical degradation of polymers in solution. J Appl Polym Sci 50:2039–2045 doi:10.1002/app.1993.070501201
Mason TJ, Lorimer JP (1989) Sonochemistry: theory, applications and uses of ultrasound in chemistry. Ellis Horwood, New York [chapter 2]
Brandrup J, Immergut EH (1975) Polymer Handbook, 2 nd ed.; Wiley-Intersicence, New York
Stovens MP (1990) Polymer Chemistry. Oxford University Press, New York
Flory PJ, Leutner FS (1948) Occurance of Head-to-Head arrangemants of structural unit in polyvinyl alcohol. J Polym Sci 3(6):880–885 doi:10.1002/pol.1948.120030608
Van krevelen DW (1990) Properties of polymers, 3rd ed.; Elsevier, Amesterdam
Jellinek HHG, Brett AW, Polm J (1954) Sci 13:111
Price GJ Smith PF (1991) Ultrasonic degradation of Polmer Solutions: 1. Polystyrene revisited. Polym. Int 24:59
Gronroos A, Pirkonen P, Heikkinen J, Ihalainen H, Mursunen HS (2001) Ultrasonic depolymerization of aqueous polyvinylalcohol. Ultrason Sonochem 8:259–264 doi:10.1016/S1350-4177(01)00086-4
Madras G, Chattopadhyay S (2001) Effect of solvent on ultrasonic degradation of poly (vinyl acetate). Polym. Degrad. Stab 71:273–278 doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00174-9
Nguyen TG, Kausch HH (1992) Mechanochemical degradation in transient elongationl flow. Adv Polym Sci 100:73–182 doi:10.1007/BFb0051636
Hung HM, Hoffmann J (1999) Kinetics and Mechanism of the Sonochemical Degradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons: Frequency Effects. Phy. Chem A103:2734–2739 doi:10.1021/jp9845930
Peters D (2000) Sonolytic degradation of volatile pollutants in natural ground water: conclusions from a model study. Ultrason Sonochem 8:221–226 doi:10.1016/S1350-4177(01)00080-3
Masselin I, Chasseray X, Durand-Bourlier L, Laine JM, Syzaret PY, Lemordant DJ (2001) Effect of sonication on polymeric membranes, Member. Sci 181:213–220
Nguyen TG (1994) Kinetics of mechanochemical degradation by gel permeation choromatography, polym. Deg. Stab 46:99–111 doi:10.1016/0141-3910(94)90114-7
Nguyen TG, Liang QZ, Kausch HH (1997) Kinetics of ultrasonic and transient elongational flow degradation. A comparative study polym 38:3783–3793
Goobermain G, Lamb J (1960) Ultrasonic degradation of polystyrene. Part II. Experimental. J. Polym Sci 42:35 doi:10.1002/pol.1960.1204213905
Price TG, Smith PF (1991) Ultrasonic degradation of polymer solution.1. polystyrene revisited. Polym Int 24:159 doi:10.1002/pi.4990240306
Casule A, Porter RS (1978) Polymer Stress Reactions. Volume 1 and 2. Academic Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taghizadeh, M.T., Bahadori, A. Degradation kinetics of poly (vinyl-pyrrolidone) under ultrasonic irradiation. J Polym Res 16, 545–554 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-008-9258-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-008-9258-3