Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Predictive Study of Learner Attitudes Toward Open Learning in a Robotics Class

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open learning (OL) strives to transform teaching and learning by applying learning science and emerging technologies to increase student success, improve learning productivity, and lower barriers to access. OL of robotics has a significant growth rate in secondary and/or high schools, but failures exist. Little is known about why many users stop their OL after their initial experience. Previous research done under different task environments has suggested a variety of factors affecting user satisfaction with different types of OL. In this study, we tested a regression model for student satisfaction involving students’ attitudes toward OL usage. A survey was conducted to investigate the critical factors affecting students’ achievements and satisfaction in OL of robotics with use of own developed direct manipulation learning environment as learning context. A multiple regression analyses were carried out to investigate how different facets of students’ expectations and experiences are related to perceived learning achievements and course satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance was performed to determine the effect of predictor variables to student satisfaction. The results demonstrate that students have significantly positive perceptions toward using OL of robotics as a learning-assisted tool. Furthermore, behavioral intention to use OL is influenced by perceived usefulness and self-efficacy. The following five major categories of satisfaction factors with OL course were revealed during analysis of the studies (effect sizes in parentheses): organization (0.69); implementation (0.61); professional content (0.53); interaction (0.43); self-efficacy (0.14). All these effect sizes were judged to be significant and large. The results also showed that learner–mentor/instructor interaction, learner–professional content interaction, and online and offline self-efficacy were good predictors of student satisfaction and course quality. Peer interactions and self-regulated learning have to be considered carefully. A learner–mentor/instructor and learner–professional content interaction are indicated as most significant interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aixia D, Wang D (2011) Factors influencing learner attitudes toward E-learning and development of E-learning environment based on the integrated E-learning platform. Int J e- Educ e-Bus e-Manage e-Learn 1(3):264–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen IE, Seaman J (2010) Class differences: online education in US. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/class_differences.pdf

  • Artino AR (2007) Online military training: using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students’ satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Q Rev Distance Educ 8(3):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1988) Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In: Hamilton V, Bower GH, Frijda NH (eds) Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation. Kluwer Academy, Dordrecht, pp 37–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barak B, Zadok Y (2009) Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. Int J Technol Des Educ 19(3):289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio J (2007) Interaction online: a reevaluation. Q Rev Distance Educ 8(4):339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Biner PM, Bink ML, Huffman ML, Dean RS (1997) The impact of remote site group size on student satisfaction and relative performance in interactive telecourses. Am J Distance Educ 11(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakers JR (2011) The rise of technological literacy in primary education. In: Benson C, Lunt J (eds) International handbook of primary technology education: reviewing the past twenty years. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 181–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiranda M (2004) The grounding of a discipline: cognition and instruction in technology education. Int J Technol Des Educ 14:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenkraft A (2010) Retrospective analysis of technological literacy of K-12 students in the USA. Int J Technol Des Educ 20:277–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliner JA, Morgan GA (2000) Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (2005) Investigating the drivers of student satisfaction: the application of regression analysis. Investig Univ Teach Learn 2(2):46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigouridis E, Siskos Y (2010) Customer satisfaction evaluation, methods for measuring and implementing service quality. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamner E, Lauwers T, Bernstein D, Nourbakhsh I, Di Salvo C (2008) Robot diaries: broadening participation in the computer science pipeline through social technical exploration. Paper presented at the AAAI symposium on using AI to motivate greater participation in computer science. Retrieved from www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2008/SS-08-08/SS08-08-008.pdf

  • Handal B, MacNish J, Petocz P (2013) Adopting mobile learning in tertiary environments: instructional, curricular and organizational matters. Educ Sci 3:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CB (2008) Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: a review of the literature and directions for research. Perform Improv Q 20(3–4):7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoepfl M (2007) Alternative classroom assessment tools and scoring mechanisms. In: Hoepfl M, Lindstrom M (eds) Assessment of technology education: council of technology teacher education 56th yearbook. McGraw-Hill, Peoria, pp 65–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (2006) Modeling with technology, mindtools for conceptual change, 3rd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski K, Switzer J, Gloeckner G (2009) Workforce readiness: a study of university students’ fluency with information technology. Comput Educ 53(2):228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley TR (2008) Cognitive processes of students participating in engineering-focused design instruction. J Technol Educ 19:50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo YC, Walker AE, Belland BR, Schroder KEE (2013) A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 14(1):16–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre J (2008) The expected value of a point-biserial (or similar) correlation. Rasch Meas Trans 22(1):1154–1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino AJ (2013) Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. Willey, Hobeken

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2001) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore MG (1989) Three types of interactions. Am J Distance Educ 3(2):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MG, Kearsley G (1996) Distance education: a systems view. Wadsworth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumtaz S (2000) Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. J Inform Technol Teach Educ 9(3):319–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel-Levitz (2011) National online learners priorities report. Retrieved from https://www.noellevitz.com/upload/Papers_and_Research/2011/PSOL_report%202011.pdf

  • Nykanen J, Lindh M (2012) Robotics and automation in primary teacher education—changing practices in the faculty of education at the University of Oulu, Finland. PATT- Pupils Attitudes toward Technology, 19–42

  • Paechter M, Maier B, Macher D (2010) Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Comput Educ 54:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson C (2012) Comparative analysis of students ‘satisfaction with teaching on STEM versus non-STEM programmes. Psychol Teach Rev 18:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina S, Feng F, Kim J (2007) Researching cognition and technology: how we learn across the lifespan. Int J Tech Design Educ 18:375–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pombo L, Smith M, Abelha M, Caixinha H, Costa N (2012) Evaluating an online e-module for Portuguese primary teachers: trainees’ perceptions. Technol Pedag Educ 21(1):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puzziferro M (2008) Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. Am J Distance Educ 22(2):72–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slangen L, Van Keulen H, Gravemeijer K (2011) What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. Int J Technol Des Educ 21:449–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins RJ, Chappuis J (2011) Introduction to student-involved assessment for learning. Pearson Education Inc, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan FR (2008) Robotics and science literacy: thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. J Res Sci Teach 45(3):373–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun P, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen Y–Y, Yeh D (2007) What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput Educ. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JS (2006) Student perceptions of selected technology student association activities. J Technol Educ 17(2):56–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman BJ (1989) A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. J Educ Psychol 81(3):329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study on which this paper is based was supported by the European Union funded Project Leonardo da Vinci INFIRO No. 2011-1-HR1-LEO05-00828. The authors gratefully thank the all members of Project group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva ploscad 16, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Stanislav Avsec, David Rihtarsic & Slavko Kocijancic

Authors
  1. Stanislav Avsec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Rihtarsic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Slavko Kocijancic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav Avsec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D. & Kocijancic, S. A Predictive Study of Learner Attitudes Toward Open Learning in a Robotics Class. J Sci Educ Technol 23, 692–704 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9496-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9496-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation