Skip to main content
Log in

Unperturbed Schelling Segregation in Two or Three Dimensions

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schelling’s models of segregation, first described in 1969 (Am Econ Rev 59:488–493, 1969) are among the best known models of self-organising behaviour. Their original purpose was to identify mechanisms of urban racial segregation. But his models form part of a family which arises in statistical mechanics, neural networks, social science, and beyond, where populations of agents interact on networks. Despite extensive study, unperturbed Schelling models have largely resisted rigorous analysis, prior results generally focusing on variants in which noise is introduced into the dynamics, the resulting system being amenable to standard techniques from statistical mechanics or stochastic evolutionary game theory (Young in Individual strategy and social structure: an evolutionary theory of institutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998). A series of recent papers (Brandt et al. in: Proceedings of the 44th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC 2012), 2012); Barmpalias et al. in: 55th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science, Philadelphia, 2014, J Stat Phys 158:806–852, 2015), has seen the first rigorous analyses of 1-dimensional unperturbed Schelling models, in an asymptotic framework largely unknown in statistical mechanics. Here we provide the first such analysis of 2- and 3-dimensional unperturbed models, establishing most of the phase diagram, and answering a challenge from Brandt et al. in: Proceedings of the 44th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC 2012), 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. N. Immorlica, R. Kleinberg, B. Lucier, M. Zadomighaddam, Exponential Segregation in a Two-Dimensional Schelling Model with Tolerant Individuals, preprint, arXiv:1511.02537.

  2. The C++ code for these simulations is available at http://barmpalias.net/schelcode.shtml.

  3. One should think of \(\mathtt {pn}\) as p-artial n-eighbourhood, \(\mathtt {uh}\) as u-nh-appy, and \(\mathtt {ruh}\) as r-ight-extended neighbourhood u-nh-appy.

  4. Here it is to be understood that how large one must take w, and how large n must be compared to w, may depend on our particular choices of \(\tau \) and \(\gamma \) (as well as the given values \(\tau _{\alpha }\) and \(\tau _{\beta }\)).

  5. Think of \(\mathtt {ju}\) as j-ust u-nhappy and think of \(\mathtt {rju}\) as r-ight extended neighbourhood j-ust u-nhappy.

  6. One should think of \(\mathtt {ln}\) as (standing for) l-ower n-eighbourhood, and \(\mathtt {rn}\) as r-otated n-eighbourhood.

References

  1. Amit, D.J., Gutfreund, H., Sompolinsky, H.: Spin-glass models of neural networks. Phys. Rev. A 32, 1007 (1985)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barmpalias, G., Elwes, R., Lewis-Pye, A.: Digital morphogenesis via Schelling segregation. In: FOCS 2014 55th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Oct. 18–21, Philadelphia (2014)

  4. Barmpalias, G., Elwes, R., Lewis-Pye, A.: Tipping points in 1-dimensional schelling models with switching agents. J. Stat. Phys. 158, 806–852 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bollobás, B.: Random Graphs. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandt, C., Immorlica, N., Kamath, G., Kleinberg, R.: An analysis of one-dimensional schelling segregation. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2012)

  7. Byrka, K., Jdrzejewski, A., Sznajd-Weron, K., Weron, R.: Difficulty is critical: the importance of social factors in modeling diffusion of green products and practices. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 723–735 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canning, A., Naef, J.-P.: Phase diagrams and the instability of the spin glass states for the diluted hopfield neural network model. J. Phys. I 2, 1791–1801 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castillo, I.P., Skantzos, N.S.: The Little-Hopfield model on a sparse random graph. J. Phys. A 37, 9087–9099 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dall’Asta, L., Castellano, C., Marsili, M.: Statistical physics of the Schelling model of segregation. J. Stat. Mech. 7, L07002 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gauvin, L., Vannemenus, J., Nadal, J.-P.: Phase diagram of a Schelling segregation model. Eur. Phys. J. B 70, 293–304 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Henry, A.D., Prałat, P., Zhang, C.: Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(21), 8605–8610 (2011)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopfield, J.J.: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79(8), 2554–2558 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kleinberg, J.: Cascading behavior in networks: algorithmic and economic issues. In: Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ódor, G.: Self-organising, two temperature Ising model describing human segregation. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 3, 393–398 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pancs, R., Vriend, N.: Schellings spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. J. Public Econ. 91(1–2), 1–24 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollicott, M., Weiss, H.: The dynamics of Schelling-type segregation models and a non-linear graph Laplacian variational problem. Adv. Appl. Math. 27, 17–40 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Schelling, T.: Models of segregation. Am. Econ. Rev. 59, 488–493 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schelling, T.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., Krysan, M.: Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations, revised edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stauffer, D., Solomon, S.: Ising, Schelling and self-organising segregation. Eur. Phys. J. B 57, 473–479 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vinković, D., Kirman, A., Physical, A.: Analogue of the Schelling model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 51(103), 19261–19265 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wormald, N.C.: Differential equations for random processes and random graphs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 5, 1217–1235 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Young, H.P.: Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, J.: A dynamic model of residential segregation. J. Math. Soc. 28(3), 147–170 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, J.: Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 54(4), 533–550 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, J.: Tipping and residential segregation: a unified Schelling model. J. Reg. Sci. 51, 167–193 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sandro Azaele for some helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Barmpalias was supported by the 1000 Talents Program for Young Scholars from the Chinese Government, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) President’s International Fellowship Initiative No. 2010Y2GB03. Additional support was received by the CAS and the Institute of Software of the CAS. Partial support was also received from a Marsden Grant of New Zealand and the China Basic Research Program (973) Grant No. 2014CB340302. Andrew Lewis-Pye (previously Andrew Lewis) was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Elwes.

Additional information

Authors are listed alphabetically.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barmpalias, G., Elwes, R. & Lewis-Pye, A. Unperturbed Schelling Segregation in Two or Three Dimensions. J Stat Phys 164, 1460–1487 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1589-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1589-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation