Skip to main content
Log in

A Classical WR Model with \(q\) Particle Types

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A version of the Widom–Rowlinson model is considered, where particles of \(q\) types coexist, subject to pairwise hard-core exclusions. For \(q\le 4\), in the case of large equal fugacities, we give a complete description of the pure phase picture based on the theory of dominant ground states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A short article [17] discusses a lattice version of the model and explains ideas behind the proofs, and mentions possible developments stemming from our approach.

  2. Our hope is that the methodology presented here in a self-contained manner could be used as the base for further developments of the WR model and the PST in a wider context.

References

  1. Bricmont, J., Kuroda, K., Lebowitz, J.L.: The structure of Gibbs states and phase coexistence for non-symmetric continuum Widom–Rowlinson model. Zeitschrift Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb. 67, 121–138 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bricmont, J., Slawny, J.: First order phase transitions and perturbation theory. In: Dorlas, T.C., Hugenholtz, N.M., Winnink, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on the Mathematical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory, Groningen, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 257, pp. 10–51 (1985)

  3. Bricmont, J., Slawny, J.: Phase transitions in systems with a finite number of dominant ground states. J. Stat. Phys. 54, 89–161 (1989)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chayes, J.T., Chayes, L., Kotecký, R.: The analysis of the Widom–Rowlison model by stochastic geometric methods. Commun. Math. Phys. 172, 551–569 (1995)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandez, R., Procacci, A.: Cluster expansion for abstract polymer models. New bounds from an old approach. Commun. Math. Phys. 274, 123–140 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgii, H.O., Haggstrom, O.: Phase transistions in continuum Potts models. Commun. Math. Phys. 181, 507–528 (1996)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgii, O., Haggstrom, O., Maes, C.: The random geometry of equilibrium phases. Phase Transit. Crit. Phenom. 18, 1–142 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kotecky, R.: Pirogov–Sinai theory. In: Francoise, J.-P., Naber, G.L., Tsou, S.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, vol. 4, pp. 60–65. Elsevier, Oxford (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotecky, R., Preiss, D.: Cluster expansions for abstract polymer models. Commun. Math. Phys. 103, 491–498 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lebowitz, J.L., Lieb, E.H.: Phase transition in a continuum classical system with finite interactions. Phys. Lett. 39A, 98–100 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lebowitz, J.L., Mazel, A.E.: On the uniqueness of Gibbs states in the Pirogov–Sinai theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 189, 311–321 (1997)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Malyshev, V.A., Minlos, R.A.: Gibbs random fields. The method of cluster expansions. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Martirosyan, D.G.: Uniqueness of Gibbs states in lattice models with a single ground state. Theor. Math. Phys. 63, 511–518 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Martirosyan, D.G.: Theorems concerning the boundary layers in the classical Ising models. Sov. J. Contemp. Math. Anal. 22, 59–83 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mazel, A.E., Suhov, Y.M.: Random surfaces with two-sided constraints: an application of the theory of dominant ground states. J. Stat. Phys. 64, 111–134 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazel, A.E., Suhov, Y.M.: Ground states of a boson quantum lattice model. Sinai’s Moscow Seminar on Dynamical Systems. AMS Translations. Advances in the Mathematical Sciences—28, Series 2, vol. 171, pp. 185–226. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mazel, A., Suhov, Yu., Stuhl, I., Zohren, S.: Dominance of most tolerant species in multi-type lattice Widom–Rowlinson models. J. Stat. Mech. 2014, P08010 (2014). doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/8/P08010

  18. Pirogov, S.A., Sinai, Y.G.: Phase diagrams of classical lattice systems (Russian). Theor. Math. Phys. 25, 358–369 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pirogov, S.A., Sinai, YaG: Phase diagrams of classical lattice systems. Continuation (Russian). Theor. Math. Phys. 26, 61–76 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruelle, D.: Existence of a phase transition in a continuous classical system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1040–1041 (1971)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Runnels, L.K., Lebowitz, J.L.: Phase transitions of a multicomponent Widom–Rowlinson model. J. Math. Phys. 15, 1712–1717 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seiler, E.: Gauge Theories as a Problem of Constructive Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 159. Springer, Berlin (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sinai, Y.G.: Theory of Phase Transitions: Rigorous Results. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Widom, B., Rowlison, J.S.: New model for the study of liquid–vapor phase transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 52, 1670–1684 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zahradnik, M.: An alternate version of Pirogov–Sinai theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 93, 559–581 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been conducted under Grant 2011/51845-5 provided by the FAPESP, and Grant 2011.5.764.45.0 provided by The Reitoria of the Universidade de São Paulo. YS and IS express their gratitude to the IME, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, for the warm hospitality. YS expresses his gratitude to the ICMC, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, for the warm hospitality YS thanks Math Department, Penn State University, USA, for the warm hospitality during the academic year 2014–2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Suhov.

Appendix: The Polymer Expansion Theorem

Appendix: The Polymer Expansion Theorem

Consider a finite or countable set \(\Theta \) the elements of which are called (abstract) contours and denoted \(\theta ,\theta '\), ets. Fix some anti-reflexive and symmetric relation \(\sim \) on \(\Theta \times \Theta \) (with \(\theta \not \sim \theta \) and \(\theta \sim \theta '\) equivalent to \(\theta '\sim \theta \)). A pair \(\theta ,\theta ' \in \Theta \times \Theta \) is called incompatible (\(\theta \not \sim \theta '\)) if it does not belong to the relation and compatible (\(\theta \sim \theta '\)) in the opposite case. (In our context, two contours are compatible when they are mutually external and have the same external type.) A collection \(\{\theta _j\}\) is called a compatible collection of contours if any two its elements are compatible. Every contour \(\theta \) is assigned a (generally speaking) complex-valued statistical weight denoted by \(w(\theta )\), and for any finite \(\Lambda \subseteq \Theta \) an (abstract) partition function is defined as

$$\begin{aligned} Z(\Lambda )=\sum \limits _{\{\theta _j\}\subseteq \Lambda } \prod _j w(\theta _j), \end{aligned}$$
(6.1)

where the sum is extended to all compatible collections of contours \(\theta _i\in \Lambda \). The empty collection is compatible by definition, and it is included in \(Z(\Lambda )\) with statistical weight \(1\).

A polymer \(\Pi =[[\theta _i^{\alpha _i}]]\) is an (unordered) finite collection of different contours \(\theta _i \in \Theta \) taken with positive integer multiplicities \(\alpha _i\), such that for every pair \(\theta ',\ \theta '' \in \Pi \) there exists a sequence \(\theta '=\theta _{i_1},\ \theta _{i_2},\ldots , \theta _{i_s}=\theta '' \in \Pi \) with \(\theta _{i_j}\not \sim \theta _{i_{j+1}},\ j=1,2,\ldots ,s-1\). The notation \(\Pi \subseteq \Lambda \) means that \(\theta _i \in \Lambda \) for every \(\theta _i \in \Pi \).

With every polymer \(\Pi \) we associate an (abstract) graph \(G(\Pi )\) which consists of \(\sum \limits _i \alpha _i\) vertices labeled by the contours from \(\Pi \) and edges joining every two vertices labeled by incompatible contours. As follows from the definition of \(\Pi \), graph \(G(\Pi )\) is connected. We denote by \(r(\Pi )\) the quantity

$$\begin{aligned} r(\Pi )=\prod _i (\alpha _i!)^{-1} \sum \limits _{G' \subseteq G(\Pi )} (-1)^{\sharp \mathcal E(G')} \end{aligned}$$
(6.2)

(the Moebius-type inversion coefficient). Here the sum is taken over all connected subgraphs \(G'\) of \(G(\Pi )\) containing all \(\sum \limits _i \alpha _i\) vertices, and \(\sharp \mathcal E(G')\) denotes the number of edges in \(G'\). For any \(\theta \in \Pi \) we denote by \(\alpha (\theta ,\Pi )\) the multiplicity of contour \(\theta \) in polymer \(\Pi \).

The Polymer expansion theorem (Theorem 6.1 below) is a modification of assertions from [9] (see also [22]) which has been established in [16].

Theorem 6.1

Suppose that there exists a function \(a(\theta ):\ \Theta \mapsto {\mathbb R}^{+}\) such that for any contour \(\theta \)

$$\begin{aligned} \sum \limits _{\theta ':\ \theta '\not \sim \theta } |w(\theta ')| e^{a(\theta ')} \le a(\theta ). \end{aligned}$$
(6.3)

Then, for any finite \(\Lambda \),

$$\begin{aligned} \log Z(\Lambda )=\sum \limits _{\Pi \subseteq \Lambda } w(\Pi ), \end{aligned}$$
(6.4)

where the statistical weight of a polymer \(\Pi =[\theta _i^{\alpha _i}]\) equals

$$\begin{aligned} w(\Pi )=r(\Pi ) \prod _i w(\theta _i)^{\alpha _i}. \end{aligned}$$
(6.5)

Moreover, the series (6.4) for \(\log Z(\Lambda )\) absolutely converges in view of the bound

$$\begin{aligned} \sum \limits _{\Pi :\ \Pi \ni \theta } \alpha (\theta ,\Pi ) |w(\Pi )| \le |w(\theta )| e^{a(\theta )}, \end{aligned}$$
(6.6)

which holds true for any contour \(\theta \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazel, A., Suhov, Y. & Stuhl, I. A Classical WR Model with \(q\) Particle Types. J Stat Phys 159, 1040–1086 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1219-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1219-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation