Skip to main content
Log in

Quantum Mechanics and Imprecise Probability

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An extension of the Born rule, the quantum typicality rule, has recently been proposed [B. Galvan in Found. Phys. 37:1540–1562 (2007)]. Roughly speaking, this rule states that if the wave function of a particle is split into non-overlapping wave packets, the particle stays approximately inside the support of one of the wave packets, without jumping to the others.

In this paper a formal definition of this rule is given in terms of imprecise probability. An imprecise probability space is a measurable space \((\varOmega,{\mathcal{A}})\) endowed with a set of probability measures ℘. The quantum formalism and the quantum typicality rule allow us to define a set of probabilities \({\mathcal{P}}_{\varPsi}\) on (X T,ℱ), where X is the configuration space of a quantum system, T is a time interval and ℱ is the σ-algebra generated by the cylinder sets. Thus, it is proposed that a quantum system can be represented as the imprecise stochastic process \((X^{T},{\mathcal{F}},{\mathcal {P}}_{\varPsi})\) , which is a canonical stochastic process in which the single probability measure is replaced by a set of measures. It is argued that this mathematical model, when used to represent macroscopic systems, has sufficient predictive power to explain both the results of the statistical experiments and the quasi-classical structure of the macroscopic evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allori, V., Zanghì, N.: What is Bohmian mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 43, 1743 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0112008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J., Kaloyerou, P.N.: An ontological basis for the quantum theory. Phys. Rep. 6, 321 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. J. Stat. Phys. 67, 843 (1992). arXiv:quant-ph/0308039

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Quantum equilibrium and the role of operators as observables in quantum theory. J. Stat. Phys. 116, 959–1055 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0308038

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Everett, H.: Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Galvan, B.: Typicality vs. probability in trajectory-based formulations of quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 37, 1540–1562 (2007). arXiv:quant-ph/0605162

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein, S.: Boltzmann’s Approach to Statistical Mechanics. In: Bricmont, J., Dürr, D., Galavotti, M.C., Ghirardi, G., Petruccione, F., Zanghì, N. (eds.) Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 574. Springer, Berlin (2001). arXiv:cond-mat/0105242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Philosophy, p. 49. Allen & Unwin, London (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huber, P.J.: Robust Statistics, pp. 253–258. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Mott, N.: The wave mechanics of alpha-ray tracks. In: Proc. R. Soc. A 126, 79 (1929). Reprinted in: Wheeler J.A., Zurek, W.H.: Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton University Press (1984), Sect. I-6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson, E.: Derivation of the Schrödinger equation from Newtonian mechanics. Phys. Rev. 150, 1079–1085 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peruzzi, G., Rimini, A.: Quantum measurement in a family of hidden-variable theories. Found. Phys. Lett. 9, 505–519 (1996). arXiv:quant-ph/9607004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Struyve, W., Westman, H.: A New Pilot-Wave Model for Quantum Field Theory. In: Bassi, A., Dürr, D., Weber, T., Zanghì, N. (eds.) Quantum Mechanics: Are There Quantum Jumps? and On the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 844. American Institute of Physics, New York (2006). arXiv:quant-ph/0602229

    Google Scholar 

  14. Imprecise probability. Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprecise_probability

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Galvan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galvan, B. Quantum Mechanics and Imprecise Probability. J Stat Phys 131, 1155–1167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9530-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9530-2

Keywords

Navigation