Abstract
Seismic swarms in a volcanic field can be indicators of the movements of volcanic activity and stagnant magma in the Earth’s crust. In the Tancítaro-Parícutin volcanic region, to the west of the Michoacán-Guanajuato volcanic field in Mexico, at least six seismic swarms have occurred in the last 25 years. However, greater precision is still required due to the distance between and non-permanence of the seismic stations. We used data from a broadband station of the Earth Sciences Research Institute (INICIT-UMSNH) and records from Mexican National Seismological Service (SSN), Center for Geosciences (UNAM) and Mexican National Center for Prevention of Disasters (CENAPRED) to relocate and obtain focal mechanisms for four selected seismic events. We applied the fractal methodology to analyze the inter-event times of the seismic swarm sequences. Two well-defined swarm sequences were identified, and, subsequently, the fractal behavior of the logarithm of inter-event times was analyzed by means of the Hurst and Holder exponent. Our goal was the identification of the different dynamical stages acting during the seismic swarm generation processes, that seem to be related to the stress transfer in different seismogenic faults. By means of the b-values and the temporal evolution of the Hurst exponent, at least five different stages can be distinguished during the Tancítaro-Parícutin seismic swarms. These stages appear to be determined by dynamic changes in the seismic sequence, also indicated by the focal mechanisms whose fits with faults that were apparently activated during the seismic swarm. The Tancítaro-Parícutin seismic swarm processes indeed show multi-fractal behavior, which may be related to different stages in the diffusion process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data source of the hypocentral data was obtained from the Mexican National Seismological Service (SSN 2022) (www.ssn.unam.mx). The seismic records used were provided by the broadband seismic network of the Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra “Dr. Víctor Hugo Garduño Monroy” of the UMSNH, the Mexican National Seismological Service (SSN), the Center for Geosciences (CGEO-UNAM) and the Mexican National Center for Prevention of Disasters (CENAPRED).
References
Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a-bM and its confidence limits. Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ 43:237–239
Bak P, Christensen K, Danon L, Scanlon T (2002) Unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 88(17):4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.178501
Bak P (2013) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Springer Science & Business Media
Bender B (1987) Effects of observational errors in relating magnitude scales and fitting the Gutenberg Richter parameter. Bull. of the Seism. Soc of Am 77:1400–1428. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0770041400
CENAPRED (2022) Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastre, México. Dirección de Instrumentación y Cómputo. Web page www.cenapred.gob.mx
Chevrel M, Siebe C, Guilbaud MN (2014) Eruptive activity of enigmatic medium-sized volcanoes in the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field (MGVF), Central Mexico: The case of El Metate. In: American geophysical union, fall meeting 2014, Abstract ID. V23B-4794. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AGUFM.V23B4794C/abstract
Corona-Chávez P (2018) Revisitando los volcanes de la Región del Parícutin: morfología, petrología y edad. Ciencia Nicolaita 74:31–58
Enescu B, Ito K (2002) Spatial analysis of the frequency-magnitude distribution and decay rate of aftershock activity of the 2000 western tottori earthquake. Earth, Planets and Space 54:847–859. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352077
Feder J (1988) The cluster fractal dimension. In: Fractals. Physics of solids and liquids. Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2124-6_3
Ferrari L, Pasquare G, Venegas S, Castillo D, Romero F (2012) Regional tectonics of western Mexico and its implications for the northern boundary of the Jalisco block. Int Geophys 33(1):139–151. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1994.33.1.545
Figueroa-Soto A, Mendoza-Ponce A (2021) Monitoreando terremotos en una zona del centro de México. Saber Mas. No. 58. ISSN: 2007–7041
Figueroa-Soto A (2009) Análisis de tiempo interevento en secuencias de réplicas para la identificación de estados de relajación del esfuerzo. MSc Thesis. Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, UNAM
Gardine M, West ME, Cox T (2011) Dike emplacement near Parícutin volcano, Mexico in 2006. Bull Volcanol 73:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-010-0437-9
Gómez-Calderón DA, Soria-Caballero DC, Corona-Chávez P (2021) Tectónica y sismicidad en la Región Volcánica Parícutin-Tancítaro, Michoacán, México. Ciencia Nicolaita, Num 82. https://doi.org/10.35830/cn.vi82.556
Gutenberg R, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seism Soc Am 34:185–188
Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116:770–808 (Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs)
Ihlen EA (2012) Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab. Front Physiol 3:141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00141
Ishimoto M, Iida K (1939) Observations of earthquakes registered with the microseismograph constructed recently. Bull Earthquake Res Inst 17:443–478
Kagan Y (2002) Aftershock zone scaling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:641–655. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010172
Kale MD, Butar FB (2005) Fractal analysis of time series and distribution properties of Hurst exponent (Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University)
Kantelhardt JW, Zschiegner SA, Konscienly-Bunde E, Havlin S, Bunde A, Stanley HE (2002) Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Phys A 316:87–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3
Larrea P, Widom E, Siebe C, Salinas S, Kuentz D (2019) A re-interpretation of the etrogenesis of Paricutin volcano: distinguishing crustal contamintion from mantle heterogeneity. Chem Geol 504:66–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.10.026
Lee CK, Yu CC, Wang CC, Hwang RD, Yu GK (2006) Scaling characteristics in aftershocks sequence of earthquake. Physyca 371:692–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.06.013
Legrand D, Perton M, Macías JL, Siebe C, Pacheco J, Chacón F, Lermo J, Quintanar L, Cisneros G (2023) Repeated seismic swarms near Paricutin volcano: precursors to the birth of a new monogenetic volcano in the Michoacán-Guanajuato volcanic field, México? Bull Volcanol 85(5):30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-023-01645-0
Li CF (2003) Rescaled-range and power spectrum analyses on well-logging data. Geophys J Int 153(1):201–212. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01893.x
Luhr JF, Simkin T, Cuasay M (1993) Parícutin: the volcano born in a Mexican cornfield. Arizona; U.S. Geoscience Press; 1993. 427 p. ilus, maps, Tab. Monography in Disasters. ID: des-7179, Responsible library: CR3.1, Localization: CR3.1; DES
Mandelbrot B (2002) Gaussian self-affinity and fractals: Globality, The Earth, 1/f noise, and R/S. Springer, New York, NY
Manea VC, Manea M, Ferrari L (2013) A geodynamical perspective on the subduction of Cocos and Rivera plates beneath Mexico and Central America. Tectonophysics 609:56–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.039
Márquez-Ramírez VH, Nava Pichardo FA, Reyes-Dávila G (2012) Multifractality in seismicity spatial distributions: significance and possible precursory applications as found for two cases in different tectonic environments. Pure Appl Gephys 169:2091–2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0473-9
Martínez-Medina M, Soria-Caballero D, Corona-Chávez P, Gómez-Calderón DA, Figueroa-Soto A, González Fabián MC (2021) El enjambre Sísmico de Michoacán 2020, región Volcánica de Paricutin - Tancítaro. En Paricutin saberes y memorias. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Editorial, pp 91–123
Mendoza-Ponce A, Figueroa-Soto A, Soria-Caballero D, Garduño-Monroy VH (2018) Active faults sources for the Pátzcuaro-Acambay fault system (Mexico): fractal analysis of slip rates and magnitudes Mw estimated from fault length. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18(11):3121–3135. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3121-2018
Michas G, Sammonds P, Vallianatos F (2015) Dynamic multifractality in earthquake time series: insights from the Corinth Rift, Greece. Pure Appl Geophys 172:1909–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0875-y
Monterrubio-Velasco M, Lana X, Martínez MD, Zúñiga FR, Puente JDL (2020) Evolution of the multifractal parameters along different steps of a seismic activity. The example of Canterbury 2000–2018 (New Zealand). AIP adv 10(11):115109. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010103
Oleschko K, Korvin G, Munoz A, Velazquez J, Miranda ME, Carreon D, Ronquillo G (2008) Mapping soil fractal dimension in agricultural fields with GPR. Nonlinear Process Geophys 15(5):711–725. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-711-2008
Frisch U, Parisi G (1980) Fully developed turbulence and intermittency. New York Academy of Sciences. Annals 357:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb29703.x
Pinzon JI, Nunez-Cornu FJ, Rowe CA (2017) Magma intrusion near Volcan Tancítaro: Evidence from seismic analysis. Phys Earth Planet Inter 262:66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2016.11.004
Power WL, Tullis TE, Brown SR, Boitnott GN, Scholz CH (1987) Roughness of natural fault surfaces. Geophys Res Lett 14(1):29–32. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL014i001p00029
Schmittbuhl J, Gentier S, Roux S (1993) Field measurements of the roughness of fault surfaces. Geophys Res Lett 20(8):639–641. https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL00170
Sri Lakshmi S, Banerjee P (2019) Dynamic multifractality of seismic activity in Northeast India. Pure Appl Geophys 176:1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-02087-y
SSN (2022) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geofísica, Servicio Sismológico Nacional, México. https://doi.org/10.21766/SSNMX/EC/MX Dirección electrónica: http://www.ssn.unam.mx
Stubailo I, Beghein C, Davis PM (2012) Structure and anisotropy of the Mexico subduction zone based on Rayleigh-wave analysis and implications for the geometry of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117:B5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008631
Telesca L, Lapenna V (2006) Measuring multifractality in seismic sequences. Tectonophysics 423:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.023
Telesca L, Cuomo V, Lapenna V, Macchiato M (2001) Depth-dependent time-clustering behaviour in seismicity of southern California. Geophys Res Lett 28(22):4323–4326. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013495
Telesca L, Lapenna V, Macchiato M (2004) Mono and multi fractal investigation of scaling properties in temporal patterns of seismic sequences. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 19:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00188-7
Touati S, Naylor M, Main IG (2009) Origin and nonuniversality of the earthquake inter-event time distribution. Phys Rev Lett 102:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.168501
TruSoft International (1999) 1.3 Benoit fractal analysis system
Utsu T (1999) Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: a historical review and some new approaches. Pure Appl Geophys 155:471–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8677-2_15
Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72(3):373–382. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.373
Wiemer S, Katsumata K (1999) Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. J ical Res 104:13135–13151. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900032
Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:684–698. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040007
Wyss M, Klein F, Nagamine K, Wiemer S (2001) Anomalously high b-values in the South Flank of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii: evidence for the distribution of magma below Kilauea’s East rift zone. J Volcanol Geoth Res 106(1–2):23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00263-8
Xu Y, Burton PW (2006) Time varying seismicity in Greece: Hurst’s analysis and Monte Carlo simulation applied to a new earthquake catalogue for Greece. Tectonophysics 423(1–4):125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.006
Zaliapin I, Ben-Zion Y (2011) Asymmetric distribution of aftershocks on large faults in California. Geophys J Int 185:1288–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.04995.x
Zhang Y, Fan J, Marzocchi W, Shapira A, Hofstetter R, Havlin S, Ashkenazy Y (2020) Scaling laws in earthquake memory for interevent times and distances. Phys Rev Res 2(1):013264
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Mexican National Seismological Service (SSN), the Center for Geosciences (UNAM), and Mexican National Center for Prevention of Disasters (CENAPRED) for providing data. We thank the staff for the station maintenance and data acquisition and distribution.
Funding
This work received support from the CONAHCyT project 646: “Modelación de Patrones de sismicidad en fallas activas y reservorios geotérmicos de baja entalpía” and the “Convocatoria 2023 de Apoyos Complementarios para estancias Sabáticas Vinculadas a la Consolidación de Grupos de Investigación” from CONAHCYT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, C. A. J. V.; methodology, A. F. S. and A. T. M. R; validation, A. F. S; data curation, C. A. J. V.; writing—original draft, A. T. M. R. and A. F. S.; writing—review and editing, A. T. M. R., P. C. C., and A. F. S.; visualization, A. M. P. and A. G. C.; supervision, A. F. S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Copy-edited by Ambar Geerts Zapién.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Diverse dynamic states are associated pre-existing fault systems in the Paricutin region.
• The dynamical regimes are supported by evidence from focal mechanisms.
• Time-related b-value evolution for the Tancítaro-Parícutin seismic swarm sequence.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mendoza-Rosas, A.T., Juárez-Valle, C.A., Figueroa-Soto, A. et al. Identification of trends in the Tancítaro-Parícutin seismic swarm sequence through fractal characteristics of inter-event times. J Seismol 28, 373–386 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-024-10198-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-024-10198-4