Skip to main content
Log in

Affective Norms for Chinese Words of Typical Life Scenes Rated by Older Adults (ANCO)

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study provides an affective norm collected from older adults for 1,050 Chinese words that are closely related to the typical life scenes commonly encountered by older adults. Data were collected for key affective dimensions of valence and arousal using the method of adapted Self-Assessment Manikin (Bradley & Lang, 1994) in a paper-and-pencil procedure. The results showed that the current database (ANCO) was of high reliability and validity. Valence and arousal were in an asymmetrically quadratic relationship in the valence-by-arousal space; i.e., older adults rated negative words as the highest arousing, followed by positive and neutral words. In addition, by comparing affective ratings of the shared words between the present norm collected from older Chinese adults and previous norms collected from young Chinese adults (Wang et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2016), we found that compared with young adults, older ones perceived negative words as more negative and more arousing, and perceived positive words as more positive and less arousing. ANCO can serve as a valuable source of information for age-related affective research and help explicate the effects of emotion on linguistic and cognitive processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Task instructions, analysis code, and all data generated and analyzed during this study are available in the OSF repository (https://osf.io/bgmuj/).

Notes

  1. A third, less strongly related affective dimension, dominance, explains only a small percentage of the variance of affective judgments (Osgood et al., 1957), and thus has not been widely included in normative studies (e.g., Monnier & Syssau, 2014; Stadthagen-Gonzalez et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2022).

  2. For each affective dimension, there were 14 repeated words for Booklet No. 2 and for Booklet No. 9 (One word in the repeated word list in Booklet No. 2 as well as Booklet No. 9 were removed due to their unfamiliarity and ambiguity among more than 10% of the participants), and 15 repeated words for the remaining seven booklets.

  3. Behavioral data were also frequently used to validate normative databases. However, we did not adopt this approach due to the documented weak (e.g., approximately 2% in lexical decision latencies, see Citron, Weekes, et al., 2014; Kuperman et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2022; 0.2% in naming latencies, see Kuperman et al., 2014) or null (e.g., lexical decision latencies in Guasch et al., 2016; Yao et al., 2017) predictive power of valence and arousal on behavioral data. Probably due to this reason, most previous affective norms did not use behavioral data to validate their ratings (e.g., Grandy et al., 2020; Monnier & Syssau, 2014, 2017; Stadthagen-Gonzalez et al., 2017; Warriner et al., 2013).

  4. Similar to the present study, all three studies (Wang et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2016) utilized nine-point scales in valence and arousal rating tasks. The sources of the three databases were as follows. The affective database of Wang et al. (2008) was retrieved through contacting its corresponding author. The affective database of Yao et al. (2017) was downloaded from the supplementary materials in the online version of this article (doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2); and the affective database of Yu et al. (2016) (CVAW 4.0) was retrieved from http://nlp.innobic.yzu.edu.tw/resources/cvaw.html. For words that appeared in any two of the three databases or in all the three databases, their final ratings were the average scores. We did not include Xu et al. (2022) for age comparisons in the current study because participants’ ages in their study covered quite a wide range, i.e., from 18 to 62, which is quite different from age ranges in other studies (i.e., Wang et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2016, see Table 4 for details).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Daguan sub-district (Gongshu district, Hangzhou), Zhou Xin’an, and the research assistants from Zhejiang University for helping collect the data. We thank Chen Xiaocong from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for his valuable suggestions on data analyses. And we thank professor Liang-Chih Yu from Yuan Ze University for providing the raters’ information of CVAW 4.0 (Yu et al., 2016).

Funding

This work is supported by a grant (2021GH023) to the corresponding author from the Social Science Fund of Zhejiang Higher Education, and a grant (2022YFC3601600) to the same author from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis and investigation, Writing—original draft preparation, Writing—review and editing. HW: Methodology, Writing—review and editing. YD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanping Dong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhejiang University.

Informed Consent

All participants gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, D., Wen, H. & Dong, Y. Affective Norms for Chinese Words of Typical Life Scenes Rated by Older Adults (ANCO). J Psycholinguist Res 52, 1115–1140 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09948-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09948-1

Keywords

Navigation