Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Grammatical Categories on Letter Detection in Continuous Text

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study focuses on the interplay between the linguistic principles and the psycholinguistic processes involved in reading. Results from 56 participants on a letter detection task reveal that readers do not process all function words in the same manner. Omission rates were highest for function words occupying the head of maximal projections such as complementizers and determiners. Prepositions were shown to occupy an intermediary position between content and function words, with omission rates varying depending on their semantic load. Together these results appear to bolster and offer a finer grained picture of the role of function words within the framework of both the Guidance Organization (Greenberg et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 11(3):428–433, 2004) and Attentional Disengagement (Roy-Charland et al. in Percept Psychophys 69(3):324–337, 2007) reading models. The results of the present study are discussed using an X-bar theory approach with the goal of refining the structural account of letter detection errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Unpublished PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Assink E. M. H., Knuijt P. P. N. A. (2000) Reading development and attention to letters in words. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(4): 347–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borillo A. (2002) Il y a prépositions et prépositions. Travaux de linguistique 42: 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert M., Drieghe D., Vitu F. (2005) Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In: Underwood G. (eds) Cognitive processes in eye guidance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 53–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter P. A., Just M. A., Rayner K. (1983) What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In: Rayner K. (eds) Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes. Academic Press, New York, pp 275–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1969) Structures syntaxiques. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen M., d’Hulst Y. (2003) The syntax and semantics of noun phrases: Theoretical background. In: Coen M., d’Hulst Y. (eds) From NP to DP the syntax and semantics of noun phrases. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. (1968) Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin 70(6): 426–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran D. W. (1966) An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature 210: 658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A. (1981) Missing -ing in reading: Developmental changes in reading units. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31(1): 154–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A., Healy A. F. (1980) Missing -ing in reading: Letter detection errors on word endings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19(3): 247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A., Healy A. F. (1982) Phonetic factors in letter detection: A reevaluation. Memory & Cognition 10: 145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucambert D., Baillé J. (2011) Evolution of the missing-letter effect among student readers between ages 5 and 8. Applied Psycholinguistics 32(1): 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaatone D. (2002) Les prépositions: une classe aux contours flous. Travaux de linguistique 42: 23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner W. R., Clement D. E. (1963) Goodness of pattern uncertainty. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2: 446–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S., Healy A. F., Koriat A., Kreiner H. (2004) The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11(3): 428–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S. N., Koriat A., Shapiro A. (1992) The effects of syntactic structure on letter detection in adjacent function words. Memory & Cognition 20(6): 663–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley J. A., Healy A. F. (1991) When are reading units larger than letter? Refinement of unitization reading model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17: 1062–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy A. F. (1976) Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 235–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Healy A. F. (1994) Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading texts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1: 333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy A. F., Drewnowski A. (1983) Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letter detection in mispelled words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9: 413–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff A. W., Radach R., Eiter B. M., Skelly M. (2003) Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: Comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29(5): 894–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy A. (2000) Parafoveal processing in word recognition. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53(2): 429–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball J. (1973) Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2(1): 15–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knittel M.-L. (2002) Existe-t-il un DP en turc?. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 31: 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A., Greenberg S. N. (1991) Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17: 1035–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A., Greenberg S. N. (1993) Prominence of leading functors in function morpheme sequences as evidenced by letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19: 34–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A., Greenberg S. N. (1994) The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1(3): 345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A., Greenberg S. N. (1996) The enhancement effect in letter detection: Further evidence for the structural model of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22(5): 1184–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A., Greenberg S. N., Goldshmid Y. (1991) The missing-letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17: 66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeman D. (2008) Prépositions du français: état des lieux. Langue Française 157(1): 5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkie G. W., Kerr P. W., Dyre B. P. (1994) What are ‘normal’ eye movements during reading: Toward a mathematical description. In: Ygge J., Iennerstrand G. (eds) Eye movements in reading. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 315–327

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkie G. W., Kerr P. W., Reddixx M. D., Zola D. (1988) Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research 28: 1107–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan P. J. (1978) Acoustic factors in letter cancellation: Developmental considerations. Developmental Psychology 14: 117–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik J. E., Healy A. F. (1995) The effect on meaning on letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21: 82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musseler J., Koriat A., Nißlein N. (2000) Letter-detection patterns in German: A window to the early extraction of sentential structure during reading. Memory & Cognition 28(6): 993–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir T. A., Jacobs A. M., O’Regan J. K. (1998) Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition 26(4): 810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New B., Pallier C., Fernand L., Matos R. (2001) Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique 101: 447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan J. K. (1979) Moment to moment control of eye saccades as a function of textual parameters in reading. In: Kolers P. A., Wrolstad M. E., Bouma H. (eds) Processing of visible language. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan J. K., Jacobs A. M. (1992) Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 18: 185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock J. Y. (1997) Langage et Cognition. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelli D. G., Burns C. W., Farell B., Moore-Page D. C. (2006) Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research 46: 4646–4674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radach R., Kennedy A. (2004) Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current deficits and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16: 3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K. (1998) Eye movement in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124(3): 372–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K., Pollatsek A., Coltheart M. (1987) Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review attention and performance XII. In: Rayner K., Pollatsek A. (eds) The psychology of reading. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 327–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Read J. D. (1983) Detection of Fs in a single statement: The role of phonetic recoding. Memory & Cognition 11(4): 390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy-Charland A., Saint-Aubin J., Klein R. M., Lawrence M. (2007) Eye movements as direct tests of the GO model for the missing-letter effect. Perception and Psychophysics 69(3): 324–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roy-Charland A., Saint-Aubin J., Lawrence M., Klein R. M. (2009) Solving the chicken and egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71(7): 1553–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Aubin J., Klein R. M. (2001) Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27(2): 318–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Aubin J., Klein R. M. (2008) The influence of reading skills on the missing-letter effect among elementary school students. Reading Research Quarterly 43(2): 132–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Aubin J., Klein R. M., Roy-Charland A. (2003) Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 29: 1191–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Aubin J., Poirier M. (1997) The influence in word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French. Memory & Cognition 25: 666–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider V. I., Healy A. F. (1993) Detecting phonemes and letters in text: Interactions between different types and levels of processes. Memory & Cognition 21: 739–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider V. I., Healy A. F., Gesi A. T. (1991) The role of phonetic processes in letter detection: A reevaluation. Journal of Memory & Language 30: 294–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siloni T. (1990) On the parallelism between CP and DP: The case of Hebrew semirelatives. Proceedings of LCJL 1: 135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P. T., Groat A. (1979) Spelling patterns, letter cancellation and the processing of text. In: Kolers P. A., Wrolstad M. E., Bouma M. E. (eds) Processing of visible language. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi A. (1994) The noun phrase. In: Kiefer F., Kiss K. (eds) The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and semantics 27: The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Academic Press, New York, pp 179–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaguer C. (2008) Classement syntaxique des prépositions simples du français. Langue Française 157(1): 20–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitu F. (1991) The influence of parafoveal processing in linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect. Perception and Psychophysics 50: 58–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitu F., O’Regan J. K., Inhoff A. W., Topolski R. (1995) Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception and Psychophysics 57(3): 352–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White S. J., Rayner K., Liversedge S. P. (2005) The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12(3): 466–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winer B. J., Brown D. R., Michels K. M. (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département de linguistique, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, Succursale Centre Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada

    Denis Foucambert & Michael Zuniga

Authors
  1. Denis Foucambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Zuniga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Foucambert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foucambert, D., Zuniga, M. Effects of Grammatical Categories on Letter Detection in Continuous Text. J Psycholinguist Res 41, 33–49 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9175-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9175-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation