Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of Language Form and Conventional Wording on Judgments of Illness

  • Original Artical
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research indicates that category labels influence category judgments, but little is known regarding the effects for familiar categories with significant social consequences. The present studies address this issue by examining the effect of linguistic form on judgments of illnesses. Both mental and physical illnesses were presented in each of three linguistic forms: noun, adjective, and possessive phrase. In Study 1, participants were asked to judge the permanence of a set of novel illnesses that differed in wording (e.g., “He is a baxtermic”; “He is baxtermic”; “He has baxtermia”). In Studies 2 and 3, participants were asked to judge which forms of wording were most familiar for actual mental illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia) and physical illnesses (e.g., diabetes). In Study 4, participants were asked to judge the permanence of a set of familiar illnesses that differed in wording. The results indicated that for novel illnesses, nouns (“is a”) imply greatest permanence and possessive nouns (“has”) imply least permanence. However, for familiar illnesses, permanence judgments are also influenced by how frequently each form appears in ordinary language use. Mental illnesses are more often expressed with relatively permanent forms (“is” and “is a”) , whereas physical illnesses are more often expressed with relatively transient forms (“has”). The results demonstrate the importance of both linguistic form and conventional wording patterns on how categories are interpreted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (2001). Publication manual (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation.

  • Balaban M.T., Waxman S.R. (1997). Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64, 3–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourland D.D., Johnston P.D. (eds). (1991). To be or not: An e-prime anthology. Concord, CA, International Society for General Semantics

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman M., Levinson S.C. (eds). (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development. New York, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark E.V. (1993) The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark E.V., Gelman S.A., Lane N. (1985). Noun compounds and category structure in young children. Child Development 56, 84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley J.M., Fazio R.H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist 35, 867–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman S.A., Coley J.D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology 26, 796–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman S.A., Heyman G.D. (1999). Carrot-eaters and creature-believers: The effects of lexicalization on children’s inferences about social categories. Psychological Science 10, 489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman S.A., Markman E.M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition 23, 183–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman S.A., Markman E.M. (1987). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development 58, 1532–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In: Kuczaj II S.A. (eds), Language development: Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. (eds). (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham S.A., Kilbreath C.S., Welder A.N. (2004). Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Development 75, 409–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall D.G., Moore C.E. (1997). Red bluebirds and black greenflies: Preschoolers’ understanding of the semantics of adjectives and count nouns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 67, 236–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman G.D., Gelman S.A. (2000a). Preschool children’s use of novel predicates to make inductive inferences about people. Cognitive Development 15, 263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman G.D., Gelman S.A. (2000b). Preschool children’s use of traits labels to make inductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77, 1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E., Agnoli F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review 98, 377–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaswal V.K., Markman E.M. (2002). Children’s acceptance and use of unexpected category labels to draw non-obvious inferences. In: Gray W., Schunn C. (eds), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 500–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy J. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26, 291–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link B.G., Cullen F.T., Frank J., et al. (1987). The social rejection of former mental patients: Understanding why labels matter. American Journal of Sociology 92, 1461–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman A.B., Ross B.H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin 129, 592–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markman E. (1989). Categorization and naming in children. Cambridge MA, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieradzik, K., Cochrane R. (1985). Public attitudes towards mental illness: The effects of behaviour, roles, and psychiatric labels. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 31, 23–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson J.B., Witten B.J. (1987). Disabling language and attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation of Psychology 32, 245–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, Nowlin-Drummond, (2001). Politically correct labels and schizophrenia: A rose by any other name? Schizophrenia Bulletin 27, 197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Piner K.E., Kahle L.R. (1984). Adapting to the stigmatizing label of mental illness: Foregone but not forgotten. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 805–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Socall D.W., Holtgraves T. (1992). Attitudes toward the mentally ill: The effects of label and beliefs. The Sociological Quarterly 33, 435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton G.M., Banaji M.R. (2004). Being what you say: The effect of essentialist linguistic labels on preferences. Social Cognition 22, 193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman S.R., Markow D.B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology 29, 257–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welder A.N., Graham S.A. (2001). The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants’ inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development 72, 1653–1673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wigboldus D.H.J., Semin G.R., Spears R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78, 5–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition 85, 223–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi T., Markman A.B. (2000). Inference using categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26: 776–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan A. Gelman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynaert, C.C., Gelman, S.A. The Influence of Language Form and Conventional Wording on Judgments of Illness. J Psycholinguist Res 36, 273–295 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9045-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9045-4

Keywords

Navigation