Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of danvatirsen supporting flat dosing switch

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Danvatirsen is a Generation 2.5 antisense oligonucleotide under clinical development. Population PK modelling was conducted using data from 3 available danvatirsen Phase I/II studies in oncology patients to investigate the impact of flat dosing on exposure compared to ideal body weight-based dosing. A total of 126 patients who received danvatirsen doses ranging from 1 to 4 mg/kg as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab, most at 3 mg/kg (n = 70), was used in the danvatirsen population PK analysis. A 2-compartment model with linear elimination described the data well. Covariate analysis revealed ideal body weight was not a significant covariate on the PK of danvatirsen; nor was age, sex or race. The model-based simulation suggested that steady state weekly AUC and Cmax were very similar between 3 mg/kg and 200 mg flat dosing (geometric mean of AUC: 62.5 vs. 63.4 mg h/L and Cmax: 26.2 vs. 26.5 mg/L for two dose groups) with slightly less overall between-subject variability in the flat dosing regimen. The switch to flat dosing was approved by multiple regulatory agencies, including FDA, EMA, PMDA and ANSM. Several ongoing studies have been evaluating flat dosing. Interim analysis from an ongoing study (D5660C00016, NCT03421353) has shown the observed steady state concentration from 200 mg flat dose is in agreement with the model predictions. The population PK model could be further utilized in subsequent exposure-response efficacy and safety modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crooke ST, Bennett CF (1996) Progress in antisense oligonucleotide therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 36:107–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Monia BP, Lesnik EA, Gonzalez Lima WF, McGee D, Guinosso CJ, Kawasaki AM, Cook PD, Freier SM (1993) Evaluation of 2′-modified oligonucleotides containing 2′-deoxy gaps as antisense inhibitors of gene expression. J Biol Chem 268:14514–14522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seth PP, Siwkowski A, Allerson CR, Vasquez G, Lee S, Prakash TP, Wancewicz EV, Witchell D, Swayze EE (2009) Short antisense oligonucleotides with novel 2′-4′ conformationaly restricted nucleoside analogues show improved potency without increased toxicity in animals. J Med Chem 52(1):10–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu RZ, Grundy JS, Geary RS (2013) Clinical pharmacokinetics of second generation antisense oligonucleotides. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 9(2):169–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Food and Drug Administration (2001) USFDA. Guidance for industry: bioanalytical method validation, vol 66. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm070107.pdf

  6. Nguyen TH, Mouksassi MS, Holford N, Al-Huniti N et al (2017) Model evaluation of continuous data pharmacometric models: metrics and graphics. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 6(2):87–109

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tong X, Zhou D, Savage A, Mullen JA, Li Y, Taylor W, Li J, Al-Huniti N, Xu H (2018) Population pharmacokinetic modeling with enterohepatic circulation for AZD3241 in healthy subjects and patients with multiple system atrophy. J Clin Pharmacol 58(11):1452–1460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou W, Li L, Birmingham B, Xu H, Lillieborg S, Zhou D, Al-Huniti N (2017) Population pharmacokinetic analysis of zolmitriptan and its metabolite in adults and adolescents to support dose selection in children with migraine. J Clin Pharmacol 57(10):1258–1267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu H, Li J, Webber L, Kakkar R, Chen Y, Al-Huniti N (2016) Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of azd4901 and simulation to support dose selection for the phase 2a study. J Clin Pharmacol 56(8):999–1008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Huniti N, Xu H, Zhou D, Aksenov S, Fox R, Bui KH (2017) Population exposure-response modeling supported selection of naloxegol doses in phase III studies in patients with opioid-induced constipation. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 6(10):705–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12229

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Huniti N, Zhou D, Xu H, Aksenov S, Bui KH, Fox R, Helmlinger G, Stanski D (2017) Pharmacometric modeling of naloxegol efficacy and safety: impact on dose and label. Clin Pharmacol Ther 102(5):741–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou D, Li L, Bui K, Learoyd M, Berges A, Milenkova T, Al-Huniti N, Tomkinson H, Xu H (2018) Bridging olaparib capsule and tablet formulations using -population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis in oncology patients. Clin Pharmacokinet 10:100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-018-0714-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou D, Lu Z, Sunzel M, Xu H, Al-Huniti N (2014) Population pharmacokinetic modelling to assess clinical drug-drug interaction between AZD7325 and midazolam. J Clin Pharm Ther 39(4):404–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards AY, Elgart A, Farrell C, Barnett-Griness O, Rabinovich-Guilatt L, Spiegelstein O (2017) A population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of custirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, in oncology patients and healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83(9):1932–1943

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Hard ML, Andersen G, Pabst G, Wagener G, Singh T, Chin W, Culm-Merdek K, Boltje I, von Moltke LL (2014) Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of mipomersen in healthy japanese volunteers and comparison with western subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 52(4):314–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mipomersen (Kynamro) [Package Inert] (2013) Genzyme Corporation. Cambridge. Accessed from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/203568s000lbl.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganesh Mugundu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, H., Tong, X., Mugundu, G. et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of danvatirsen supporting flat dosing switch. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 46, 65–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-019-09619-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-019-09619-6

Keywords

Navigation