Skip to main content
Log in

Sonophotocatalytic Degradation of Chitosan in the Presence of Fe(III)/H2O2 System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The degradation of chitosan by means of ultrasound irradiation and its combination with homogeneous photocatalysis (photo-Fenton) was investigated. Emphasis was given on the effect of additive on degradation rate constants. 24 kHz of ultrasound irradiation was provided by a sonicator, while an ultraviolet source of 16 W was used for UV irradiation. To increase the efficiency of degradation process, degradation system was combined with Fe(III) (2.5 × 10−4mol/L) and H2O2 (0.020–0.118 mol/L) in the presence of UV irradiation and the rate of degradation process change from 1.873 × 10−9−6.083 × 10−9 mol1.7 L s−1. Photo-Fenton process led to complete chitosan degradation in 60 min with the rate increasing with increasing catalyst loading. Sonophotocatalysis in the presence of Fe(III)/H2O2 was always faster than the respective individual processes. A synergistic effect between ultrasound and ultraviolet irradiation in the presence of Fenton reagent was calculated. The degraded chitosans were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and average molecular weight of ultrasonicated chitosan was determined by measurements of intrinsic viscosity of samples. The results show that the total degree of deacetylation (DD) of chitosan change, partially after degradation and the decrease of molecular weight led to transformation of crystal structure. A negative order for the dependence of the reaction rate on total molar concentration of chitosan solution within the degradation process was suggested. Results of this study indicate that the presence of catalyst in the reaction medium can be utilized to reduce molecular weight of chitosan while maintaining the power of irradiated ultrasound and degree of deacetylation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alam R, Khan MA, Khan RA, Ghoshal S, Mondal MIH (2008) J Polym Environ 16:213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chi FH, Cheng WP (2006) J Polym Environ 14:411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen L, Chen D, Wu C (2003) J Polym Environ 11:87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trzcinski S, Staszewska DU (2004) Carbohyd Polym 56:489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jayaraju J, Raviprakash SD, Keshavayya J, Rai SK (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 102:2738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen RH, Chang JR, Shyur JS (1997) Carbohyd Res 299:287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Cai J, Fan L (2008) J Appl Polym Sci 109:2417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodane V, Vilivalam VD (1998) Pharm Sci Technol 1:246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shahidi F, Arachchi JKV, Jeon YJ (1999) Trends Food Sci Tech 10:37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar MNVR (2000) React Funct Polym 46:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin C, Du Y, Zong L, Zeng F, Liu Y, Zhou B (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 80:435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mason TJ, Cordmas ED (1996) Transac Inst Chem Eng 74:511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crum LA (1995) Ultrason Sonochem 2:147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsaih ML, Chen RH (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 90:3526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mason TJ (1999) Sonochemistry; Chapter 1. Oxford University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shim SE, Ghose S, Isayev A (2002) Polymer 43:5535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Masselin I, Chasseray X, Durand-Bourlier L, Laine J, Syzaret P, Lemordant D (2001) J Membr Sci 181:213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanioka S, Matsui Y, Irie T, Takahiko T, Tanigawa T, Tanaka Y, Shibata H, Sawa KY (1996) Biosci Biotech Biochem 60:2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin CQ, Xiao L, Du YM, Feng M, Shi XW (2000) J Wuhan Univ 46:195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin CQ, Du YM, Xiao L (2002) Polym Degrad Stab 76:211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu Y, Wei G, Peng J (2004) Chinese J Polym Sci 22:439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berberidou C, Poulios I, Xekoukoulotakis NP, Mantzavinos D (2007) Appl Catal B: Environ 74:63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada K, Tamura T, Azaki Y, Kashiwada A, Hata Y, Higashida K, Nakamura Y (2009) J Polym Environ 17:95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Assis OBG, de Britto D (2008) J Polym Environ 16:192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Krevelen DW (1990) Properties of Polymers, third ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen RH (1998) Int J Biol Macromol 23:135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang W, Shuqin B, Li S, Qin W (1991) Int J Biol Macromol 13:281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taghizadeh MT, Mehrdad A (2003) Ultrason Sonochem 10:309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stovens MP (1990) Polymer Chemistry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Flory PJ, Leutner FS (1948) J Polym Sci 3:880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Madras G, Chattopadhyay S (2001) Polym Degrad Stab 71:273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nguyen TG, Kausch HH (1992) Adv Polym Sci 100:173

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taghizadeh MT, Asadpour T (2009) Ultrason Sonochem 16:280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Taghizadeh MT, Bahadori A (2009) J Polym Res 16:545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodriguez M, Sarria V, Esplugas S, Pulgarin C (2002) J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem 151:129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang KLB, Tai MC, Cheng FH (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:4845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2005) Adv Environ Res 8:553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Safarzadeh-Amiri A, Bolton JR, Cater SR (1996) J Adv Oxid Technol 1:18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Brand N, Mailhot G, Bolte M (1998) Environ Sci Technol 32:2715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Katsumata H, Kaneco S, Suzuki T, Ohta K, Yobiko Y (2007) Chemosphere 69:1261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mrowetz M, Pirola C, Selli E (2003) Ultrason Sonochem 10:247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wasikiewicz JM, Yoshii F, Nagasawa N, Wach RA, Mitomo H (2005) Radiat Phys chem 73:287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu T, Zivanovic S, Hayes DG, Weiss J (2008) J Agric Food Chem 56:5112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu H, Bao J, Du Y, Zhou X, Kennedy JF (2006) Carbohyd Polym 64:553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen RH, Hwa HD (1996) Carbohyd Polym 29:353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Saito H, Tabeta R (1987) Macromolecules 20:2424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Taghi Taghizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taghizadeh, M.T., Abdollahi, R. & Orang, N.S. Sonophotocatalytic Degradation of Chitosan in the Presence of Fe(III)/H2O2 System. J Polym Environ 20, 208–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0409-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0409-y

Keywords

Navigation