Abstract
The past decade has witnessed the advent of the smartphone, a device armed with computing power, mobility and downloadable “apps,” that has become commonplace within the medical field as both a personal and professional tool. The popularity of medically-related apps suggests that physicians use mobile technology to assist with clinical decision making, yet usage patterns have never been quantified. A digital survey examining smartphone and associated app usage was administered via email to all ACGME training programs. Data regarding respondent specialty, level of training, use of smartphones, use of smartphone apps, desired apps, and commonly used apps were collected and analyzed. Greater than 85% of respondents used a smartphone, of which the iPhone was the most popular (56%). Over half of the respondents reported using apps in their clinical practice; the most commonly used app types were drug guides (79%), medical calculators (18%), coding and billing apps (4%) and pregnancy wheels (4%). The most frequently requested app types were textbook/reference materials (average response: 55%), classification/treatment algorithms (46%) and general medical knowledge (43%). The clinical use of smartphones and apps will likely continue to increase, and we have demonstrated an absence of high-quality and popular apps despite a strong desire among physicians and trainees. This information should be used to guide the development of future healthcare delivery systems; expanded app functionality is almost certain but reliability and ease of use will likely remain major factors in determining the successful integration of apps into clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boulos, M. N., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., and Jones, R., How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 10:24, 2011. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-10-24.
McGlaun, S., Latest Nielsen data shows smartphone market is stabilizing, major OS’ hold steady, 2011.
Inc. A, http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-iphone/. Accessed August 2 2011. 2011.
Dolan, B., Timeline: Medical milestones for the iPhone. Mobi Health News. http://mobihealthnews.com/11290/timeline-medical-milestones-for-the-iphone/. Accessed August 2 2011. 2011.
Medical iPhone. http://medicaliphone.blogspot.com/. 2011.
iPhone Medical Apps. http://iphonemedicalapps.com/. 2011.
iMedicalApps. http://www.imedicalapps.com/app-review/. 2011.
Abroms, L. C., Padmanabhan, N., Thaweethai, L., and Phillips, T., iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. Am J Prev Med 40(3):279–285, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.032.
Franko, O. I., Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(7):2042–2048, 2011. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1904-0.
Oehler, R. L., Smith, K., and Toney, J. F., Infectious diseases resources for the iPhone. Clin Infect Dis 50(9):1268–1274, 2010. doi:10.1086/651602.
Dala-Ali, B. M., Lloyd, M. A., and Al-Abed, Y., The uses of the iPhone for surgeons. Surgeon 9(1):44–48, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.014.
Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1988.
Freudenheim, M. Digital doctoring; The race is on to put a computer into every physician’s hand. The New York Times, January 8, 2001. 2011.
Times IB., FDA Drafting Guidelines, Seeks Comments on Medical Apps. http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/185387/20110722/mobile-apps-fda-proposes-guidelines-regulate-medical-health-apps-iphones-ipads-devices.htm. 2011.
Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 37 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franko, O.I., Tirrell, T.F. Smartphone App Use Among Medical Providers in ACGME Training Programs. J Med Syst 36, 3135–3139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7