Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing Mammography Reports for Health Analytics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As massive collections of digital health data are becoming available, the opportunities for large-scale automated analysis increase. In particular, the widespread collection of detailed health information is expected to help realize a vision of evidence-based public health and patient-centric health care. Within such a framework for large scale health analytics we describe the transformation of a large data set of mostly unlabeled and free-text mammography data into a searchable and accessible collection, usable for analytics. We also describe several methods to characterize and analyze the data, including their temporal aspects, using information retrieval, supervised learning, and classical statistical techniques. We present experimental results that demonstrate the validity and usefulness of the approach, since the results are consistent with the known features of the data, provide novel insights about it, and can be used in specific applications. Additionally, based on the process of going from raw data to results from analysis, we present the architecture of a generic system for health analytics from clinical notes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/index.htm?navi.htm+ka00

  2. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, developed by the American College of Radiology.

  3. This, of course, does not hold for every document and every human (within a given language) since specialized terminology is not universally accessible. It is, however, a reasonable assumption within a field, e.g., health sciences.

References

  1. TREC-5, http://trec.nist.gov, 1999.

  2. North Carolina Medical Journal. Special Issue on Data and Health Policy, 2008.

  3. Aronow, D. B., Fangfang, F., and Croft, W. B., Ad hoc classification of radiology reports. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 6(5):393–411, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakalar, R., IBM’s vision for the future in patient-centric global health care: IBM’s vision of how advanced health analytics and automated health information infrastructure will transform anatomic pathology services. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 132(5):766–771, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berndt, D. J., and Clifford, J., Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: KDD Workshop, pp. 359–370, 1994.

  6. Borg, I., and Groenen, P., Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer, 1996.

  7. Burnside, B., Strasberg, H., and Rubin, D., Automated indexing of mammography reports using linear least squares fit. In: Proc. of the 14th International Congress and Exhibition on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 449–454, 2000.

  8. Chapman, W. W., Bridewell, W., Hanbury, P., Cooper, G. F., and Buchanan, B. G., Evaluation of negation phrases in narrative clinical reports. In: Proc AMIA Symp, pp. 105–109, 2001.

  9. Dumais, S., Faceted search. Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 1103–1109, 2009.

  10. Giger, M., Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in medical images. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2(5):39–45, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harkema, H., Setzer, A., Gaizauskas, R., and Hepple, M., Mining and modelling temporal clinical data. In: Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, 2005.

  12. Heffernan, R., Mostashari, F., Das, D., Karpati, A., Kulldorff, M., and Weiss, D., Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10(5):858–64, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howell, C., Stimulus package contains $19 billion for health care technology spending and adoption of electronic health records. Wisconsin Technology Network news, February 19 2009. (Retrieved 29 April 2010, at http://wistechnology.com/articles/5523/).

  14. Jain, N. L., and Friedman, C., Identification of findings suspicious for breast cancer based on natural language processing of mammogram reports. In: Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp, pp. 829–833, 1997.

  15. Jolliffe, I., Principal Component Analysis. Springer, 2002.

  16. Lohr, S., Tech Companies Push to Digitize Patients’ Records. New York Times, September 10 2009.

  17. Ma, F., Bajger, M., and Bottema, M., Temporal analysis of mammograms based on graph matching. Digital Mammography, pp. 158–165, 2010.

  18. McCallum, A. K., Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mccallum/bow, 1996.

  19. Meystre, S. M., Savova, G. K., Kipper-Schuler, K. C., and Hurdle, J. F., Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: A review of recent research. In: Yearb Med Inform, pp. 128–144, 2008.

  20. Mitchell, T. M., Machine Learning, 1st edn.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nassif, H., Woodsz, R., Burnsidey, E., Ayvacix, M., Shavlik, J., and Page, D., Information extraction for clinical data mining: A mammography case study. In: ICDM - DDDM09 Workshop, 2009.

  22. Norén, G., Hopstadius, J., Bate, A., Star, K., and Edwards, I., Temporal pattern discovery in longitudinal electronic patient records. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 20:1–27, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Patton, R. M., Potok, T. E., Beckerman, B. G., and Treadwell, J. N., A genetic algorithm for learning significant phrase patterns in radiology reports. In: GECCO ’09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 2665–2670. New York, NY: ACM, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Porter, M. F., An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 14(3):130–137, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reed, J. W., Jiao, Y., Potok, T. E., Klump, B. A., Elmore, M. T., and Hurson, A. R., Tf-icf: A new term weighting scheme for clustering dynamic data streams. In: ICMLA ’06: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, pp. 258–263. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roelofs, A., Karssemeijer, N., Wedekind, N., Beck, C., van Woudenberg, S., Snoeren, P., Hendriks, J., Rosselli del Turco, M., Bjurstam, N., Junkermann, H., et al., Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 242(1):70, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rokach, L., Romano, R., and Maimon, O., Negation recognition in medical narrative reports. Inf. Retr. 11(6):499–538, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakoe, H., and Chiba, S., Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 26(1):43–49, 1978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Salton, G., and Buckley, C., Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5):513–523, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sebastiani, F., Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 34:1–47, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Studnicki, J., Fisher, J. W., and Eichelberger, C. N., NC- CATCH: North Carolina comprehensive assessment for tracking community health. [2], pp. 122–126.

  32. Tang, J., Rangayyan, R., Xu, J., El Naqa, I., and Yang, Y., Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: Recent advances. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 13(2):236–251, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Timp, S., Varela, C., and Karssemeijer, N., Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 26(7):945–953, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yi, B.-K., Jagadish, H. V., and Faloutsos, C., Efficient retrieval of similar time sequences under time warping. In: ICDE ’98: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 201–208. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Robert M. Nishikawa, Ph.D., Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, for providing the large dataset of unstructured mammography reports.

Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P. O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831-6285, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy Under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. Research partially sponsored by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, LDRD #5327.

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos C. Rojas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojas, C.C., Patton, R.M. & Beckerman, B.G. Characterizing Mammography Reports for Health Analytics. J Med Syst 35, 1197–1210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9685-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9685-2

Keywords

Navigation