Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Extended Replication Study of the Well-Being Intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI)

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study is an expanded replication study examining the efficacy of a modified version of Passmore and Holder’s (2017) nature-based well-being intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI). Undergraduates (N = 173) from a university in China were randomly assigned to engage in the NNI for 2 weeks (i.e., pay attention to, and provide a brief description of, how the everyday nature you encounter makes you feel) or to engage in one of two active control conditions. Both quantitative and qualitative findings replicated previous results. At the end of the 2-week intervention, compared to control groups, participants who engaged in the NNI reported significantly higher levels of well-being and significantly lower levels of ill-being (ds from 0.41 to 0.69). As in the 2017 study, these well-being benefits were not moderated by trait levels of connectedness to nature. Further replicating the 2017 results, these well-being benefits were not a function of the NNI group spending significantly more time in nature (ds = 0.05–0.07,); rather, boosts to well-being and reduction of ill-being were the result merely of paying attention to the everyday nature participants encountered in their daily routines. Analysis of qualitative findings revealed that positive emotions were significantly more likely to be reported by participants in the NNI condition (z = 6.5), while negative emotions were significantly less likely to be reported by those in the NNI condition (z = −7.3). This research provides further empirical support for the Noticing Nature Intervention as an effective well-being intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

https://osf.io/ea7x6/?view_only=a410b3b177a34690bd00933529a174eb

Notes

  1. G*Power analysis parameters: F tests; ANCOVA – fixed effects, main effects, and interactions; effect size f = 0.25; α error = 0.05; power = 0.80; numerator df = 2; groups = 3; covariates = 1.

  2. Additional measures of small self, place attachment, interdependent self construal, and allo-inclusive identity were also administered pre- and post-intervention for the purpose of a separate, exploratory study focusing on different aspects than herein. These will be reported on in a separate article.

  3. To be conservative, we also ran the moderation analyses using the NNI condition and a collapsed human-built + placebo condition. All moderation effects remained non-significant with the exception of prediction of meaning in life where the interaction was marginally significant.

  4. Qualitative coding was conducted by the second author who is fluent in Chinese and English.

References

  • Ballew, M. T., & Omoto, A. M. (2018). Absorption: How nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology, 10, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2017.0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. R., Donahue, M. L., Keeler, B. L., Shorb, C. M., Mohtadi, T. Z., & Shelby, L. J. (2019). Characterizing nature and participant experience in studies of nature exposure for positive mental health: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, A. (2020). Every day nature: How noticing nature can quietly change your life. National Trust.

  • Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, F., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, C. A., Passmore, H.-A., Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Dopko, R. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the well-being benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a positive psychology intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A., Cullen, K., Keeney, C., Canning, C., Mooney, O., Chinseallaigh, E., & O’Dowd, A. (2020). Effectiveness of positive psychology interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1818807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakhssi, F., Kraiss, J. T., Sommers-Spijkerman, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2018). The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCicco, T. L., & Stroink, M. L. (2007). A third model of self-construal: The metapersonal self. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 26, 82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, O., & Passmore, H.-A. (2021). Green exercise: Actively flourishing in nature. In E. Brymer, M. Rogerson, & J. Barton (Eds.), Nature and health: Physical activity in nature (pp. 35–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154419

  • Hamann, G. A., & Ivtzan, I. (2016). 30 minutes in nature a day can increase mood, well-being, meaning in life and mindfulness: Effects of a pilot programme. Social Inquiry into Well-Being, 2, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.

  • Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilmayr, D., & Miller, T. J. (2020). Nature exposure achieves comparable health and well-being improvements as best practice, positive psychology interventions. Ecopsychology, 12(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2019.0074

  • Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., de Jong, J., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2020). The efficacy of multi-component positive psychology interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(1), 357–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00082-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., Graafsma, T., Bohlmeijer, E., & de Jong, J. (2018). The efficacy of positive psychology interventions from non-Western countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v8i1.711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical psychology/the British Psychological Society, 44, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H.-A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., & Passmore, H.-A. (2013). The nature of happiness: Nature affiliation and mental well-being. In C. L. M. Keyes (Ed.), Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health (pp. 231–257). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Passmore, H.-A., & Buro, K. (2013). Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1681–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9403-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., Yang, T., & Li, Z. (2003). Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health, 17(1), 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. T., Howell, A. J., & Passmore, H.-A. (2021). In vivo nature exposure as a positive psychological intervention: A review of the impact of nature interventions on well-being. In E. Brymer, M. Rogerson, & J. Barton (Eds.), Nature and health: Physical activity in nature. (pp. 160–174). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154419

  • Huta, V. (2013). Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In A. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonic functioning (pp. 139–158). APA Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L.-C., Yan, Y.-J., Jin, Z.-S., Hu, M.-L., Wang, L, Song, Y., Li, N.-N., Su, J., Wu, D.-X., & Xiao, T. (2020). The depression anxiety stress scale-21 in Chinese hospital workers: Reliability, latent structure, and measurement invariance across genders. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Bai, L., & Xue, S. (2016). Validation of the meaning in life questionnaire (MLQ) in Chinese university students and invariance across gender. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 3(3), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joye, Y., & van den Berg, A. (2011). Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10, 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L., Pasha-Zaidi, N., Passmore, H.-A., & Al-Karam, C. Y. (2015). Developing an indigenous positive psychology in the United Arab Emirates. Middle East Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 1–23. https://middleeastjournalofpositivepsychology.org/index.php/mejpp/article/view/24

  • Lambert, L., Passmore, H.-A., & Joshanlop, M. (2019). A positive psychology intervention program in a culturally-diverse university: Boosting happiness and reducing fear. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 1141–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9993-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tipsord, J. M., & Tate, E. M. (2008). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self. In H. A. Wayment & J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological exploration of the quiet ego (pp. 137–147). APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A., & Warber, S. L. (2016). Does perceived restorativeness mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity and perceived naturalness on emotional well-being following group walks in nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 604–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, K., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., Ferguson, F. J., & Brindley, P. (2019). A smartphone appp for improving mental health through connecting with urban nature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongrain, M., & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman (2005). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, S., Arena, A., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2019). Connectedness to nature is more strongly related to connection to distant, rather than close, others. Ecopsychology, 11(1), 59–65).

  • Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679762091678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nghiem, T. P. I., Wong, K. L., Jeevanandam, I., Chang, C. C., Tan, L. Y. C., Goh, Y., & Carrasco R. (2021). Biodoverse urban forests, happy people: Experiential evidence linking perceived biodiversity, restoration, and emotional wellbeing. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 59(127030). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127030

  • Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Grandpierre, Z. (2019). Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology, 11(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, B., Lee, K. J., Zaslawski, C., Yeung, A., Rosenthal, D., Larkey, L., & Back, M. (2017). Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: Systematic Review. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 22, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-017-0677-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, H.-A., & Holder, M. D. (2017). Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two-week intervention. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(6), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1221126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, H.-A., & Howell, A. J. (2014). Nature involvement increases hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A two-week experimental study. Ecopsychology, 6, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2014.0023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, M. J. O., Hamlin, I., Christelow, J., Passmore, H.-A., & Richardson, M. (2021). The benefits of citizen science and nature-noticing activities for wellbeing, nature connectedness and pro-nature conservation behaviours. Manuscript under review.

  • Richardson, M., Cormack, A., McRobert, L., & Underhill, R. (2016). 30 Days Wild: Development and evaluation of a large-scale nature engagement campaign to improve well-being. PLoSONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Passmore, H.-A., Lumber, R., Thomas, R., & Hunt, A. (2021). Moments, not minutes: The nature-wellbeing relationship. International Journal of Wellbeing, 11(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v11i1.1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R. K., Basurto, X., Chan, K. M. A., Klain, S., Levine, J., & Tam, J. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Environmental Psychology, 30, 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saskatchewan Medical Association. (2021). National nature prescription program, PaRx, launches in Saskatcehwan. https://www.sma.sk.ca/news/2362/news-release-national-nature-prescription-program-parx-launches-in-saskatchewan.html

  • Schebella, M. F., Weber, D., Schultz, L., & Weinstein, P. (2019). The wellbeing benefits associated with perceived and measured biodiversity in Australian urban green spaces. Sustainability, 11(3), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, D. F., Astell-Burt, T., Barber, E. A., Brymer, E., Cox, D. T. C., Dean, J., Depledg, e M., Fuller, R. A., Hartig, T., Irvine, K. N., Jones, A., Kikillus, H., Lovell, R., Mitchell, R., Niemelä, J. Pretty, J., Townsend, M., van Heezik, Y., Warber, S., & Gaston, K. J. (2019). Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: The purpose, the people and the outcomes. Sports, 7, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7060141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, P. (1982). Nature and madness. Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, C., Ikei, H., Park, B.-J., Lee, J., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2018). Psychological benefits of walking through forest areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F. (n.d.) Chinese translation of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire. Retrieved from: http://www.michaelfsteger.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MLQ-Chinese_traditional.pdf

  • Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, K.-P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M., Lo, L., Brtholomaeus, J., Zopsaftis, Z., Carey, M., & Kyrios, M. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Shi, H.-S., Geng, F.-L., Zou, L.-Q., Tan, S.-P., Wang, Y., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H. K., & Chan, R. C. K. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 in China. Psychological Assessment, 28(5):e88-e100.pas0000207

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. A., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016). Can we increase psychological well-being? The effects of interventions on psychological well- being: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0158092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L. J., Zu Ermgassen, S., Balmford, A., White, M., & Weinstein, N. (2017). Is variety the spice of life? An experimental investigation into the effects of species richness on self-reported mental well-being. PLoS ONE, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., Harsant, A., Dallimer, M., de Chavet, A. C., McEachan, R. R. C., & Hassall, C. (2018). Not all green space is created equal: Biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban space. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, C. Q., & Xu, Y. L. (2009). Reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale for Chinese people. China Journal of Health Psychology, 17(8), 948–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, M. (2002). Retrieved from: https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/eddiener/uploads/version/file/82/SWLS_Chinese.pdf

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Concordia University of Edmonton, AW 236, Allan Wachowich Centre for Science, Research, and Innovation, 7128 Ada Boulevard, Edmonton, AB, T5B 4E4, Canada

    Holli-Anne Passmore

  2. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Ying Yang

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Ying Yang

  4. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Sarena Sabine

Authors
  1. Holli-Anne Passmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarena Sabine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holli-Anne Passmore.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethics Approval

This study was conducted while Holli-Anne Passmore was affiliated with the University of British Columbia. This study was approved by the University of British Columbia’s UBC Okanagan Behavioural Research Ethics Board; H16-02868.

Consent to Participate

All participants signed consent forms prior to beginning the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Passmore, HA., Yang, Y. & Sabine, S. An Extended Replication Study of the Well-Being Intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI). J Happiness Stud 23, 2663–2683 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00516-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00516-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation