Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suicide in Happy Places: Is There Really a Paradox?

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2011 researchers published a paper that exposed a puzzling paradox: the happiest states in the U.S. also tend to have the highest suicide rates. In the current study, we re-examine this relationship by combining data from the Multiple Mortality Cause-of-Death Records, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the American Communities Survey to determine how subjective well-being and suicide are related across 1563 U.S. counties. We extend the original study in important ways: by incorporating both absolute and relative measures of subjective well-being; by examining the happiness-suicide association at a more suitable level of analysis; and by including a more robust set of control variables in the model. Contrary to the previous study, we do not observe any significant relationship, negative or positive, between the absolute and relative well-being of places and suicide rates at the county-level. Implications for the study of suicide rates and relative deprivation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almgren, G., Guest, A., Immerwahr, G., & Spittel, M. (1998). Joblessness, family disruption, and violent death in Chicago, 1970–90. Social Forces,76, 1465–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrael, D., Cook, P. J., & Miller, M. (2004). State and local prevalence of firearms ownership measurement, structure, and trends. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,20(1), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research,99(2), 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baller, R. D., & Richardson, K. K. (2002). Social integration, imitation, and the geographic patterning of suicide. American Sociological Review,67(6), 873–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System. (2005–2008). Operational and user’s guide, version 3.0 Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Berkeley, G. E., & Fox, D. M. (1978). 80,000 Governments: The politics of subnational America. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics,88(7–8), 1359–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breault, K. D. (1988). Beyond the quick and dirty: problems associated with analyses based on small samples of large ecological aggregates: Reply to Girard. American Journal of Sociology,93(6), 1479–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Amiram, V. D. (2003). The interplay among risk factors for suicidal ideation and suicide: The role of depression, poor health, and loved ones’ messages of support and criticism. American Journal of Community Psychology,32(1–2), 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, J. A., Hartman, J. T., & Matteson, D. W. (1999). Black suicide in U.S. metropolitan areas: An examination of the racial inequality and social integration-regulation hypotheses. Social Forces,77, 1049–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). “Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature,46(1), 95–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope, C., Gunnell, D., Hollingworth, W., Hawton, K., Kapur, N., Fearn, V., et al. (2014). Suicide and the 2008 economic recession: Who is most at risk? Trends in suicide rates in England and Wales 2001–2011. Social Science and Medicine,117, 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Curtis, C., & Fleet, R. W. (2013). Socio-economic factors and suicide: The importance of inequality. New Zealand Sociology,28(2), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. C., Oswald, A. J., Wilson, D., & Stephan, W. (2011). Dark contrasts: The paradox of high rates of suicide in happy places. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,80(3), 435–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. C., Wilson, D. J., & Johnson, N. J. (2013). Relative status and well-being: Evidence from U.S. suicide deaths. The Review of Economics and Statistics,95(5), 1480–1500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). “Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology,29(1), 94–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–126). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal,111, 465–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,100(19), 11176–11183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emile, D. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology. 1951 reprint. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontanella, C. A., Hiance-Steelesmith, D. L., Phillips, G. S., Bridge, J. A., Lester, N., Sweeney, H. A., et al. (2015). Widening rural-urban disparities in youth suicides, United States, 1996–2010. JAMA Pediatrics,169(5), 466–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S. A., Mattey, J. P., & Wascher, W. L. (2003). Compensating differentials and evolution in the quality-of-life among U.S. States. Regional Science and Urban Economics,33(5), 619–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life: Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modeling,20(2), 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences,359(1449), 1435–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. S., & Geling, O. (1998). Firearm suicides and homicides in the United States: Regional variations and patterns of gun ownership. Social Science and Medicine,46(9), 1227–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, G. S., Faupel, C. E., & Starr, P. D. (1987). Urbanism and suicide: A study of American Counties. Social Forces,66(1), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C. E., & Wadsworth, T. (2009). Explaining suicide among Blacks and Whites: How socioeconomic factors and gun availability affect race-specific suicide rates. Social Science Quarterly,90(5), 1203–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C. E., Wadsworth, T., & DiPietro, S. (2006). Deindustrialization, disadvantage, and suicide among young black males. Social Forces,84, 1559–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., Azrael, D., & Hemenway, D. (2002). Household firearm ownership and suicide rates in the United States. Epidemiology,13(5), 517–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., & Hemenway, D. (2008). Guns and suicide in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine,359, 989–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Multiple Mortality Causes of Death. (2005–2008). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Lee, S. (2008). Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiologic Reviews,30(1), 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,16(1), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science,327(5965), 576–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, B. A., & Mendelsohn, R. (1986). Social causation or social construction of suicide? An investigation into the social organization of official rates. American Sociological Review,51, 80–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. A., & Nugent, C. N. (2014). Suicide and the great recession of 2007–2009: The role of economic factors in the 50 U.S. States. Social Science and Medicine,116, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, V. C., Markus, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2002). Place matters: Consensual features and regional variation in American well-being and self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(1), 160–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. K., & Siahpush, M. (2002). Increasing rural-urban gradients in US suicide mortality, 1970–1997. American Journal of Public Health,92, 1161–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, A. (2012). Philosophy of econometrics. In U. Maki, D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard, & J. Woods (Eds.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 329–393). North Holland: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2000a). Suicide: A 15-year review of the sociological literature, part 1: Cultural and economic factors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior,30(2), 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2000b). Suicide: A 15-year review of the sociological literature, part 2: Modernization and social integration perspectives. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior,30(2), 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockard, J., & O’Brien, R. M. (2002). Cohort variations and changes in age-specific suicide rates over time: Explaining variations in youth suicide. Social Forces,81, 605–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, B. Q., & Zhang, J. (2016). Economic and sociological correlates of suicides: Multilevel analysis of the time series data in the United Kingdom. Journal of Forensic Sciences,61(2), 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, C. L., Conwell, Y., Jones, M. P., Phillips, C., Simonsick, E., Pearson, J. L., et al. (2002). Risk factors for late-life suicide: A prospective, community-based study. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,10(4), 398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau. “2010 5-Year Estimates.” 20062010 American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office, 2015.

  • Wadsworth, T. (2014). Sex and the pursuit of happiness: How other people’s sex lives are related to our sense of well-being. Social Indicators Research,116(1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, T. (2016). Marriage and subjective well-being: How and why context matters. Social Indicators Research,126(3), 1025–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, T., & Kubrin, C. E. (2007). Hispanic suicide in US metropolitan areas: Examining the effects of immigration, assimilation, affluence, and disadvantage. American Journal of Sociology,112, 1848–1885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, T., Kubrin, C. E., & Herting, J. (2014). Investigating the rise (and fall) of young black male suicide in the U.S., 1982–2001. Journal of African American Studies,18, 72–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, T., & Pendergast, P. M. (2014). “Obesity (Sometimes) matters: The importance of context in the relationship between obesity and life satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,55(2), 196–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2002). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, M., Colen, C., & Pescosolido, B. (2011). The sociology of suicide. Annual Review of Sociology,37, 505–528.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip M. Pendergast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pendergast, P.M., Wadsworth, T. & Kubrin, C.E. Suicide in Happy Places: Is There Really a Paradox?. J Happiness Stud 20, 81–99 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9938-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9938-y

Keywords

Navigation