Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Four Es 1-Year Later: A Tool for Predicting the Development of Gambling Problems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Four Es is a 40-item scale measuring psychological risk for the development of problem gambling behavior. One-year follow-up interviews (n = 395) from a previously reported phone survey in Queensland, Australia (n = 2,577) (Rockloff & Dyer, 2006) tested the ability of the Four Es instrument to prospectively identify persons who would later develop gambling problems. Two groups of participants were selected for the 1-year follow-up interviews, including (1) persons who had gambling problems, high-risk alcohol abuse problems, and/or substance abuse problems (abuse group); and (2) a random selection of other persons from the original survey (random group). The results indicated that the “Excess” trait, which measures impulsive behavior, was predictive of relative increases in gambling problems for both groups over the 1-year period. Additionally, the Four Es questionnaire showed good psychometric properties in the surveys, with a test-retest reliability of r = .70 and a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of α = .90 and .92 in the original and follow-up interviews, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4 ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszcvznski, A. P., & McConaghy, N. (1989). Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gambling. International Journal of the Addictions, 24, 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. H. (1976). Excitement: The gambler’s drug. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and Society. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. I. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9–10), 1001–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., Rodda, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). Differences between problem and nonproblem gamblers in subjective arousal and affective valence amongst electronic gaming machine players. Addictive Behaviors, 29(9), 1863–1867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(1), 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2004). Impulsiveness, locus of control, motivation and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(4), 319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (1998). Child and adolescent gambling problems: a program of research. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

  • Gossop, M., Darke, S., Griffiths, P., Hando, J., Powis, B., Hall, W. et al. (1995). The severity of dependence scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction, 90(5), 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E., & Evers, M. (2001). New developments in impulsivity. The Lancet, 358(9286), 949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibanez, A., Blanco, C., Donahue, E., Lesieur, H. R., Perez de Castro, I., Fernandez-Piqueras, J. et al. (2001). Psychiatric comorbidity in pathological gamblers seeking treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(10), 1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. F. (1988). A general theory of addictions: Rationale for and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. In H. J. Shatter, S. Stein, B. Gambino, & T. N. Cummings (Eds.), Compulsive Gambling Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 35–64). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Rosenthal, R. J. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature (prepared for the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV Committee on Disorders of Impulse Control Not Elsewhere Classified). Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1997). Gambling activities of young Australians: Developing a model of behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(3), 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2006). The Four Es of problem gambling: A psychological measure of risk. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction, 88(6), 791–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L. (2002). A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. F., & Abt, V. (1984). Gambling as play. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474(1), 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J. (1970). An experimental study of risk taking. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 63(12), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Impulsivity predicts problem gambling in low SES adolescent males. Addiction, 94(4), 565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Reynolds, S. K. (2005). Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale: A four-factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 19(7), 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Queensland Treasury Department, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Rockloff.

Appendix

Appendix

Questionnaire: The 4Es of Problem Gambling

Question

Strongly disagree

Slightly disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Slightly agree

Strongly agree

1. I would like to just disappear.

2. I sometimes wish that I would not feel anything.

3. I wish that nobody knew who I was.

4. I feel that I am already living in a prison.

5. I wish that I could take the next flight or bus out of my town.

6. Running away from my problems may be the only solution.

7. Sometimes I think life is too much to handle.

8. It would be good to get away to some place where no one knows me.

9. I often make excuses to avoid dealing with others.

10. When walking, I often change direction to avoid speaking with others.

11. The things I say and do are foolish.

12. I am miserable to be around.

13. I can be gloomy.

14. I am an irritable person.

15. I feel completely worthless.

16. I am often incompetent.

17. I am often embarrassed by the stupid things I say or do.

18. I usually feel guilty for something I’ve said or done.

19. I rarely live up to my own values or standards.

20. I make good decisions.

21. I am careful in my decision making.

22. I usually get into trouble because I don’t stop to think.

23. I carefully think out all my options before acting.

24. Before deciding to do something important, I will thoroughly think it through.

25. I am never careless with my money.

26. I speak without thinking.

27. My family never has to worry about how I handle money.

28. I commonly say and do things that I regret later.

29. I often buy things without thinking about whether I really need them.

30. I seldom spend more money than I should.

31. There are times when I get bored with day to day life.

32. I often cannot think of things to keep my mind occupied.

33. I get very anxious when there is nothing to do.

34. I am a restless and fidgety person.

35. Often times I find myself feeling restless.

36. I usually have too much time on my hands.

37. I am nearly always looking for things to do that keep me from being bored.

38. I often find it hard to concentrate.

39. I worry about other things while at work.

40. I hate quiet places, like libraries.

Note: Scores are calculated as an average across items on a scale of 1 to 5: 1 = Strongly disagree , 2 = Slightly disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree 4 = Slightly agree, 5 = Strongly agree. In calculating risk, items 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 30 are reverse-scored. Sub-scales for Escape, Esteem, Excess and Excitement are calculated based on items 1–10, 11–20, 21–30 and 31–40, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rockloff, M.J., Dyer, V. The Four Es 1-Year Later: A Tool for Predicting the Development of Gambling Problems. J Gambl Stud 23, 467–478 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9055-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9055-z

Keywords

Navigation