Skip to main content
Log in

Model Parameters Versus Gas Pressure in Two Different Plasma Focus Devices Operated in Argon and Neon

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the plasma focus device AECS PF-2 operated in Ar and INTI PF in Ne, model parameters of mass and current in the axial phase of plasma focus were found by matching the measured and calculated current waveforms over a range of pressures. The results show a value of fm = 0.05 ± 0.01 over 0.2–1.2 Torr in Ar; and fm = 0.04 ± 0.01 over 0.7–4.1 Torr in Neon. The value of fc = 0.7 was fitted for all cases. Combining these results with those published for several other small machines it would appear that, where measured current waveforms are not available for example in designing new machines, a good compromise would be to take a guideline value of fm = 0.05 and fc = 0.7 for both Argon and Neon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.W. Mather, Phys. Fluids 8, 366 (1965)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Lee, T.Y. Tou, S.P. Moo, M.A. Eissa, A.V. Gholap, K.H. Kwek, S. Mulyodrono, A.J. Smith Suryadi, W. Usada, M. Zakaullah, Am. J. Phys. 56, 62 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Lee, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19, 912 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Mahe, Soft X-rays from compact plasma focus” Ph D Thesis, School of Science, Nanyang Technoloical University, December 1996, Ch. 5, p. 143

  5. S. Heoh, P. Lee, R.S. Rawat, S. Lee, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 37(7), 1276–1282 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Lee, P. Lee, S.H. Saw, R.S. Rawat, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50, 8 (2008). 065012

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Akel, Sh. Al-Hawat, S.H. Saw, S. Lee, J. Fusion Energ. 29, 223–231 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Lee, S.H. Saw, P. Lee, R.S. Rawat, H. Schmidt, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(12) (2008)

  9. S. Lee, Theoretical Basis: Plasma focus Model (radiative)—S Lee Model, http://www.plasmafocus.net/IPFS/modelpackage/file/RADPF.htm (October 2010) Or http://intimal.edu.my/school/fas/UFLF/2010

  10. S. Lee, Radiative dense plasma focus computation package (2008), RADPF http://www.intimail.edu.myLschoolL fas/UFLF/

  11. T.Y. Tou, PhD Thesis, Univ. of Malaya, Malaysia, (1986)

  12. S. Al-Hawat, S. Saloum, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 49(1), 5–14 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Lee, Experiments with the ICTP-UM 3.3 kJ Plasma Fusion facility, Spring College on Plasma Physics, International Center For Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy, May 17–June 11 (1993)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first two authors would like to thank the director general of AEC of Syria, for his encouragement, guidance and permanent support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sh. Al-Hawat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Hawat, S., Akel, M., Lee, S. et al. Model Parameters Versus Gas Pressure in Two Different Plasma Focus Devices Operated in Argon and Neon. J Fusion Energ 31, 13–20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-011-9414-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-011-9414-3

Keywords

Navigation