Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Literacy Interventions for Students with Physical and Developmental Disabilities Who Use Aided AAC Devices: A Systematic Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review evaluates research on literacy interventions for persons with physical and developmental disabilities who use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Electronic database searches were completed to identify studies published between 1989 and 2009. Eighteen studies (n = 41 participants) were identified for inclusion in this review. Across studies a variety of instructional strategies were used to teach phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, text comprehension, and participation in literacy activities. These strategies included direct instruction, scaffolding of communicative attempts, least-to-most prompting with time delay, writing workshop, and story mapping. The results of these studies indicated that systematic instruction including scaffolding, direct instruction, and least-to-most prompting with time delay may be the most effective strategies to teach literacy skills to this population. These results are discussed in relation to participant characteristics, the effectiveness of interventions, and the reported social validity of interventions. Suggestions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batshaw, M., & Shapiro, B. (2002). Mental retardation. In M. L. Batshaw (Ed.), Children with disabilities (5th ed., pp. 287–305). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2002). Emerging literacy through assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bellon-Harn, M., & Harn, W. (2008). Scaffolding strategies during repeated storybook reading. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., & Gans, B. (1986). Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, K., Rankin, J., & Mirenda, P. (1994). Impact of graphic symbol use on reading acquisition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Browder, D., Wakeman, S., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D., Mims, P., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Lee, A. (2008). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Spooner, F., & Baker, J. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bus, A., van IJzendoorn, M., & Pellegrini, A. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: a meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camrata, S., & Nelson, K. (2006). Conversational recast intervention with preschool and older children. In R. J. McCauley & M. E. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders (pp. 237–264). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, F. (1992). Reading instruction for students with moderate mental retardation: review and analysis of research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 577–597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, S., & Keefe, E. (2007). Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate or severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, K., Koppenhaver, D., Yoer, D., & Nance, J. (1997). Integrated communication and literacy instruction for a child with multiple disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 142–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Fallon, K., Light, J., McNaughton, J., Drager, K., & Hammer, C. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1424–1439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., & Black, C. (2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school: a follow-up. Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hanser, G., & Erickson, K. (2007). Integrated word identification and communication instruction for students with complex communication needs: preliminary results. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 268–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., May, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). Noncurrent multiple baseline designs and the evaluation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetzroni, O. (2004). AAC and literacy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1305–1312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmquist, E., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Hedelin, L. (1994). Linguistics, AAC, and metalinguistics in communicatively handicapped adolescents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).

  • Jenkins, J. R., Peyton, J., Sanders, E. A., & Vadasy, P. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Johnston, S., Davenport, L., Kanarowski, B., Rhodehouse, S., & McDonnell, A. (2009). Teaching sound-letter correspondence and consonant-vowel-consonant combinations to young children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 123–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent-Walsh, J., & Light, J. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliewer, C., & Biklen, D. (2001). “School’s not really a place for reading”: a research synthesis of the literacy lives of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe physical and speech impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ros (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Vol. 2, pp. 156–201). New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): what is and what might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Koppenhaver, D., Erickson, K., Harris, B., McLellan, J., Skotko, B., & Newton, R. (2001a). Storybook-based communication intervention for girls with Rett syndrome and their mothers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 149–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Koppenhaver, D., Erickson, K., & Skotko, B. (2001b). Supporting communication of girls with Rett syndrome and their mothers in storybook reading. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 48, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, J., & Kelford-Smith, A. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and their nondisabled peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, L., & Fuller, D. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: a proposed superordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matas, J., Mathy-Laikko, P., Beukelman, D. R., & Legresley, K. (1985). Identifying the nonspeaking population: a demographic study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Mathisen, B., Arthur-Kelly, M., Kidd, J., & Nissen, C. (2009). Using MINSPEAK: a case study of a preschool child with complex communication needs. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4, 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mike, D. (1995). Literacy and cerebral palsy: factors influencing literacy learning in a self-contained setting. Journal of Literacy Research, 27, 627–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Millar, D., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2004). The effect of direct instruction and writer’s workshop on the early writing skills of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C., Newell, A., Booth, L., Ricketts, I., & Arnott, J. (1992). Syntax PAL: a system to improve the written syntax of language-impaired users. Assistive Technology, 4, 51–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., Tyner, B., & Pemey, J. (2000). Early steps: replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 681–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. (2007). “Please listen, it’s my turn”: instructional approaches, curricula and contexts for supporting communication and increasing access to inclusion. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32, 263–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act. 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).

  • *Ratcliff, A., & Little, M. (1996). A conversation based barrier task approach to teach sight-word vocabulary to a young augmentative communication system user. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 12, 128–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rosa-Lugo, L. I., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2008). Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santa, M. R., & Hoien, T. (1999). An assessment of early steps: a program for early intervention of reading problems. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 54–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Editorial: moving evidence-based practice forward. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: methodology and validation. Remedial & Special Education, 8, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D., Jorm, A., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T., Freeman-Lorentz, K., & McLaughlin, T. (1993). The effects of augmentative and alternative communication on vocabulary acquisition with primary age students with disabilities. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 17, 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Soto, G., & Dukhovny, E. (2008). The effect of shared book reading on the acquisition of expressive vocabulary of a 7 year old who uses AAC. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 133–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Soto, G., Yu, B., & Henneberry, S. (2007). Supporting the development of narrative skills of an eight-year-old child who uses an augmentative and alternative communication device. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Soto, G., Yu, B., & Kelso, J. (2008). Effectiveness of multifaceted narrative intervention on the stories told by a 12-year-old girl who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 76–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, J., & Clendon, S. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication, language, and literacy fostering the relationship. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, J., Spadorcia, S., Cunningham, J., Cali, K., Staples, A., Erickson, K., et al. (2006). What happens to reading between first and third grade? Implications for students who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 21–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Trudeau, N., Cleave, P., & Woelk, E. (2003). Using augmentative and alternative communication approaches to promote participation of preschoolers during book reading: a pilot study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Truxler, J., & O’Keefe, B. (2007). The effects of phonological awareness instruction on beginning word recognition and spelling. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 164–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vadasy, P., Sanders, E. A., Peyton, J., & Jenkins, J. R. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: a closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalon, K., Al Otaiba, S., & Delano, M. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 3–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Wilkinson, K., & Albert, A. (2001). Adaptations of fast mapping for vocabulary intervention with augmented language users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E., & Bell, K. (1996). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zascavage, V., & Keefe, C. (2004). Students with severe speech and physical impairments: opportunity barriers to literacy. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Special Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 432 East Campus Mall, Room 310, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Wendy Machalicek, Nancy Molfenter & Margaret K. Mbeseha

  2. Department of Special Education, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

    Amanda Sanford

  3. University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

    Russell Lang

  4. Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Mandy Rispoli

Authors
  1. Wendy Machalicek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda Sanford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Russell Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mandy Rispoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nancy Molfenter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Margaret K. Mbeseha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Machalicek.

Additional information

*Denotes reviewed studies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Machalicek, W., Sanford, A., Lang, R. et al. Literacy Interventions for Students with Physical and Developmental Disabilities Who Use Aided AAC Devices: A Systematic Review. J Dev Phys Disabil 22, 219–240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9175-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9175-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation