Skip to main content
Log in

Engaged Understanding for Lived Meaning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the practice of existential therapy as a process of engaged understanding for lived meaning. Understanding is viewed as a validating, contextualizing and resolute process of unfolding of what matters in the life projects of those entrusted to our care. Such “matterings,” or meanings, are neither lost, found nor created, but lived in each moment of our lives, and most fully disclose themselves in the engaged participation of the therapeutic relationship. Our engagement both provides respect and dignity of any way of be-ing in situations, and offers the possibility of “being otherwise,” if one chooses to do so, without privileging how one should be over how one has been or how one is in one’s current circumstance. This kind of practice is based on the human science tradition and inseparability of existential-hermeneutical-phenomenological thought and practice; We meaningfully experience through understanding our ownmost limitations and possibilities within a shared human condition. Important distinctions are made in these reflections between a more familiar “deficit-correction” model of care and the stance suggested in this paper: An understanding-collaboration model of care. The latter model places a primacy on “being-with” as both an ontological, or inherent and common given of the human condition, and as an ontic, or particular, expression of therapeutic care. The paper closes with suggested implications for evidence-based concerns in relation to this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, L., & Madison, G. (Eds.). (2012). Existential therapy: Legacy, vibrancy and dialogue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, M. (1994). Existential foundations of medicine and psychology. Northvalle: Jason Aronson Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1971). I and thou. New Work: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burston, D., & Frie, R. (2006). Psychotherapy as a human science. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, H. (1997). Existential thought and therapeutic practice: An introduction to existential psychotherapy. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (2003). Existential therapies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. (2012). Existential psychotherapy, discipline and demarche: Remembering essential horizons. In L. Barnett & G. Madison (Eds.), Existential therapy: Legacy, vibrancy and dialogue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBose, T. (2013a). Let the Kierkegaardian comedy resume: Faith-phobia and faithful leaping in evidence-based criteria for therapeutic care. Existential Analysis, 24(1), 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBose, T. (2013b). Essentialism. In D. Leeming (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Norwell: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1963). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Washington Square.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1986). The doctor and the soul: From psychotherapy to logotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halling, S. (2008). Intimacy, transcendence, and psychology: Closeness and openness in everyday life. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row.

  • Heidegger, M. (1975). The basic problems of phenomenology (A. Hofstader, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heidegger, M. (2001). Zollikon seminars: Protocols-conversations-letters. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1846/1941). Concluding unscientific postscript (D. Swenson & W. Lowrie, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Laing, R. D. (1967). The politics of experience and the bird of paradise. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). Basic writings of Nietzsche (W. Kaufmann, Ed., Trans.). New York: Penguin.

  • Nietzsche, F. (1982). The portable Nietzsche. (W. Kaufmann, Ed., Trans.). New York: Penguin.

  • Spinelli, E. (2001). The mirror and the hammer: Challenges to therapeutic orthodoxy. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, E. (2005). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, E. (2006). Demystifying therapy. London: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, E. (2007). Practising existential psychotherapy: The relational world. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd DuBose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DuBose, T. Engaged Understanding for Lived Meaning. J Contemp Psychother 45, 25–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9276-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9276-x

Keywords

Navigation