Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of substantial shortening of the endotracheal tube for decreasing airway resistance and increasing tidal volume during pressure-controlled ventilation in pediatric patients: a prospective observational study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endotracheal tubes (ETTs) used for children have a smaller inner diameter. Accordingly, the resistance across ETT (RETT) is higher. Theoretically, shortening the ETTs can decrease total airway resistance (Rtotal), because Rtotal is sum of RETT and patient’s airway resistance. However, the effectiveness of ETT shortening for mechanical ventilation in the clinical setting has not been reported. We assessed the effectiveness of shortening a cuffed ETT for decreasing Rtotal, and increasing tidal volume (TV), and estimated the RETT/Rtotal ratio in children. In anesthetized children in a constant pressure-controlled ventilation setting, Rtotal and TV were measured with a pneumotachometer before and after shortening a cuffed ETT. In a laboratory experiment, the pressure gradient across the original length, shortened length, and the slip joint alone of the ETT were measured. We then determined the RETT/Rtotal ratio using the above results. The clinical study included 22 children. The median ETT percent shortening was 21.7%. Median Rtotal was decreased from 26 to 24 cmH2O/L/s, and median TV was increased by 6% after ETT shortening. The laboratory experiment showed that ETT length and the pressure gradient across ETT are linearly related under a certain flow rate, and approximately 40% of the pressure gradient across the ETT at its original length was generated by the slip joint. Median RETT/Rtotal ratio were calculated as 0.69. The effectiveness of ETT shortening on Rtotal and TV was very limited, because the resistance of the slip joint was very large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Miyake F, Suga R, Akiyama T, Namba F. An in vitro evaluation of the influence of neonatal endotracheal tube diameter and length on the work of breathing. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28:458–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manczur T, Greenough A, Nicholson GP, Rafferty GF. Resistance of pediatric and neonatal endotracheal tubes: Influence of flow rate, size, and shape. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1595–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200005000-00056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivanov VA. Reduction of endotracheal tube connector dead space improves ventilation: a bench test on a model lung simulating an extremely low birth weight neonate. Respir Care. 2016;61:155–61. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fine GF, Borland LM. The future of the cuffed endotracheal tube. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01203.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elayaperumal A, Venkataraju A. Cut tracheal tube and GlideRite® Rigid Stylet. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:517–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marr R, Lax P. Tracheal tubes can be cut safely when in situ. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06831.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzpatrick G. Tracheal tubes can be cut safely when in situ. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1059–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06953_2.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes C, Popat M. Tracheal tubes can be cut safely when in situ. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06953_1.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahajan R, Nazir RSF. More on cutting tracheal tubes in situ. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07038_1.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jarreau PH, Louis B, Dassieu G, Desfrere L, Blanchard PW, Moriette G, et al. Estimation of inspiratory pressure drop in neonatal and pediatric endotracheal tubes. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.87.1.36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guttmann J, Kessler V, Mols G, Hentschel R, Haberthür C, Geiger K. Continuous calculation of intratracheal pressure in the presence of pediatric endotracheal tubes. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1018–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200004000-00018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guttmann J, Eberhard L, Fabry B, Bertschmann W, Wolff G. Continuous calculation of intratracheal pressure in tracheally intubated patients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:503–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199309000-00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spaeth J, Steinmann D, Kaltofen H, Guttmann J, Schumann S. The pressure drop across the endotracheal tube in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25:413–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berry A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Verghese C. Pulmonary airway resistance with the endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:395–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199902000-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Board PDP. Cutting tracheal tubes in situ. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06663.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi K, Toyama H, Funahashi Y, Kawana S, Ejima Y, Kikuchi K, et al. Influence of respiratory gas density on tidal volume during mechanical ventilation: a laboratory investigation and observational study in children. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2022;256:271–81. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.2022.j003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss M, Dullenkopf A, Gysin C, Dillier CM, Gerber AC. Shortcomings of cuffed paediatric tracheal tubes. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tareerath M, Mangmeesri P. Accuracy of age-based formula to predict the size and depth of cuffed oral preformed endotracheal tubes in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Ear, Nose Throat J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320980511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daoud EG, Katigbak R, Ottochian M. Accuracy of the ventilator automated displayed respiratory mechanics in passive and active breathing conditions: a bench study. Respir Care. 2019;64:1555–60. https://doi.org/10.4187/RESPCARE.06422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Toyama H, Endo Y, Ejima Y, Matsubara M, Kurosawa S. Comparison of actual tidal volume in neonatal lung model volume control ventilation using three ventilators. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:599–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1003800401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanaya A, Satoh D, Kurosawa S. Higher fraction of inspired oxygen in anesthesia induction does not affect functional residual capacity reduction after intubation: a comparative study of higher and lower oxygen concentration. J Anesth. 2013;27:385–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1547-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown ES. Resistance factors in pediatric endotracheal tubes and connectors. Anesth Analg. 1971;50:355–60. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-197105000-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takasugi Y, Futagawa K, Kazuhara K, Morishita S, Okuda T. Roles of endotracheal tubes and slip joints in respiratory pressure loss: a laboratory study. J Anesth. 2016;30:789–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2210-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchiyama A, Yoshida T, Yamanaka H, Fujino Y. Estimation of tracheal pressure and imposed expiratory work of breathing by the endotracheal tube, heat and moisture exchanger, and ventilator during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2013;58:1157–69. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beydon N. Interrupter resistance: what’s feasible? Paediatr Respir Rev. 2006;7:S5-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2006.04.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by KT, HT, RK, and NY. Data analysis were performed by KT, HT, YE, KK, and TI. The study was supervised by MY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroaki Toyama.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine (Date; November 16, 2020/No; 2020-1-727).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all participants.

Consent to publish

Consent to publish has been received from the parents of all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 110 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takahashi, K., Toyama, H., Kubo, R. et al. Effectiveness of substantial shortening of the endotracheal tube for decreasing airway resistance and increasing tidal volume during pressure-controlled ventilation in pediatric patients: a prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 37, 1513–1519 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01038-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01038-w

Keywords

Navigation