Skip to main content
Log in

A New Calibration Method that Compensates for the Effects of O2 and N2 on Infrared CO2 Analysers

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. This study evaluates a method for calibrating mainstream CO2 analysers in which CO2 partial pressure (P CO2) is calculated as a function of the outputs of CO2 and O2 analysers. Methods. Three mass flow controllers were used to generate 25 different reference mixtures of O2, N2 and CO2. Reference gas mixtures were combinations of P CO2 = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 kPa and O2 partial pressure (P O2) = 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 kPa (balance N2). CO2 and O2 analyser data were fitted by a calibration equation which took into account the effects of oxygen partial pressure and nonlinearity of the CO2 analyser. The calibration coefficients were tested in a separate validation data set with a variety of combinations of CO2 and O2. Results. Our new calibration method yields a standard deviation of CO2 measurement error that is significantly lower than a CO2-only calibration method in the validation data set (0.54% versus 2.72%, P < 0.05). P CO2 measurement errors produced by the single gas calibration equation are significantly correlated with P O2 in both the calibration (R = −0.9906, P < 0.05) and validation data sets (R = −0.9642, P < 0.05), but the errors given by our new calibration equation are independent of P O2 (R = −0.0364, NS, and R = −0.0305, NS, for calibration and validation data sets respectively). Calibration with only CO2 cannot eliminate the error related to the collision broadening effect of O2, which in our CO2 analyser is approximately a 1% underestimation of P CO2 for every 10 kPa (75 mmHg) increase in P O2. Conclusions. This study shows that non-dispersive infrared CO2 analyser readings can be substantially affected by background oxygen. This effect can be corrected for by calibrating the CO2 analyser with gases containing known proportions of both CO2 and O2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gedeon A, Krill P, Osterlund B. Pulmonary blood flow (cardiac output) and the effective lung volume determined from a short breath hold using the differential Fick method. J Clin Monit Comput 2002; 17: 313–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zar HA, Noe FE, Szalados JE, Goodrich MD, Busby MG. Monitoring pulmonary function with superimposed pulmonary gas exchange curves from standard analyzers. J Clin Monit Comput 2002; 17: 241–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schallom L, Ahrens T. Hemodynamic applications of capnography. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2001; 15: 56–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weg JG. A new niche for end-tidal CO2 in pulmonary embolism. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3752–3754.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiegand UK, Kurowski V, Giannitsis E, Katus HA, Djonlagic H. Effectiveness of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension for monitoring thrombolytic therapy in acute pulmonary embolism. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3588–3592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mummery HJ, Stolp BW, de LDG, et al. Effects of age and exercise on physiological dead space during simulated dives at 2.8 ATA. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94: 507–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lauber R, Seeberger B, Zbinden AM. Carbon dioxide analysers: Accuracy, alarm limits and effects of interfering gases. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 643–656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Merilainen PT. Gas and ventilatory monitoring: Measurement and application. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14: 718–725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ammann EC, Galvin RD. Problems associated with the determination of carbon dioxide by infrared absorption. J Appl Physiol 1968; 25: 333–335.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arieli R, Ertracht O, Daskalovic Y. Infrared CO2 analyzer error: An effect of background gas (N2 and O2). J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 647–650.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Block FE, Jr., McDonald JS. Sidestream versus mainstream carbon dioxide analyzers. J Clin Monit 1992; 8: 139–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher R, Werner O, Nordstrom L, Jonson B. Sources of error and their correction in the measurement of carbon dioxide elimination using the Siemens-Elema CO2 Analyzer. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 177–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raemer DB, Calalang I. Accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension analyzers. J Clin Monit 1991; 7: 195–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hornby L, Coates AL, Lands LC. Effect of analyzer on determination of mixed venous P CO 2 and cardiac output during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79: 1032–1038.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sykes MK, Vickers MD, Hull CJ, Sykes MK, Sykes MK. Principles of measurement and monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care. 3rd Edition. Oxford, Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olsson SG, Fletcher R, Jonson B, Nordstom L, Prakash O. Clinical studies of gas exchange during ventilatory support – a method using the Siemens-Elema CO2 analyzer. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 491–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Maiorow M, Baer DS, Garbuzov DZ, Connolly JC, Hanson RK. In situ combustion measurements of CO with diode-laser absorption near 2.3 um. Appl Opt 2000; 39: 5579–5589.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Barry Baker M.B.B.S., D.Phil., F.A.N.Z.C.A., F.R.C.A., F.J.F.I.C.M..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, Y., Turner, M.J. & Baker, A.B. A New Calibration Method that Compensates for the Effects of O2 and N2 on Infrared CO2 Analysers. J Clin Monit Comput 20, 75–79 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-9005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-9005-9

Keywords

Navigation