Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes of Safety Climate in Trucking: a Longitudinal Framework

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing a longitudinal approach, this study examined mechanisms explaining how safety climate is associated with truck drivers’ safety behavior and outcomes. The present study also examined the top-down process of how organization-level safety climate (i.e., top management referenced) is related to group-level safety climate (i.e., supervisor referenced). Two waves (matched N = 481) of safety climate and safety behavior data (with a 2-year interval) were obtained from a large US trucking company. Days lost due to road injuries were assessed 6 months after time 2. Autoregressive, cross-lagged, and prospective effects were examined. Safety climate scores and safety behavior were moderately stable across a 2-year period. Both organization- and group-level safety climate scores were positively associated with safety behavior. The top-down association between time 1 organization-level safety climate and time 2 group-level safety climate was supported. Safety behavior mediated the relationship between group-level safety climate and future lost days due to injury. Contrary to suggestions of some prior research, the present study shows that safety climate measures may have lasting ability to predict safety behavior/outcomes in the trucking industry. In particular, the present study supported a hierarchical model in which organization-level safety climate influences safety outcomes through its influence on group-level climate. The top-down model connotes that top management efforts to instill a strong positive safety climate to affect workers’ driving behavior operate through management’s influence on the actions of the workers’ immediate supervisor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) results for age, organization-, and group-level safety climate, and safety behavior across the matched participants (n = 481) and time 1 only participants (n = 1424) were respectively F = 20.36 (p < .01), F = .00 (p = .95), F = .01 (p = .93), and F = 2.68 (p = .10). One-way ANOVA results for age, organization-, and group-level safety climate and safety behavior across the matched participants (n = 481) and time 2 only participants (n = 4,602) were respectively F = 76.73 (p < .01), F = .65 (p = .42), F = .31 (p = .58), and F = 4.42 (p = .04; the p value was smaller than .05, but 95% confidence interval overlap was found for safety behavior across matched participants [95% CI = 4.449–4.550] and time 2 only participants [95% CI = 4.417–4.454]).

References

  • Adachi, P., & Willoughby, T. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Trucking Associations. (2017). Reports, trends & statistics. Available at http://www.trucking.org/News_and_Information_Reports_Industry_Data.aspx. Retrieved October 2017.

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsness, Z. I., Diekmann, K. A., & Seidel, M. L. (2005). Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity and social network centrality in impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 401–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, M. E., Payne, S. C., Taylor, A. B., & Beus, J. M. (2014). The shelf life of a safety climate assessment: How long until the relationship with safety–critical incidents expires? Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 519–540.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beus, J. M., Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., & Arthur, W. (2010). Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 713–727.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • British Security Industry Association. (2010). Lone workers guide for employers. Worcester, UK: British Security Industry Association Available at http://www.bsia.co.uk/Portals/4/Publications/288_lone_workers_employers_guide.pdf. Retrieved March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, T., Griffin, M. A., Flatau Harrison, H., & Neal, A. (2017). Safety climate and culture: Integrating psychological and systems perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 341–353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Bliese, P. D., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. L., Liu, K. H., & Chang, C. C. (2018). Practical application of safety climate: A case study in the Taiwanese steel industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 67, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103–1127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (2010). An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 497–512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedobbeleer, N., & Beland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationship constructs and measurement. Psychological Methods, 5, 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, S. M., Taylor, M., Sathiparsad, R., Bos, A. E., & de Vries, H. (2015). Predicting safe sex: Assessment of autoregressive and cross-lagged effects within the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(11), 1397–1404.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., Mearns, P., O'Connor, R., & Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • FMCSA. (2013). Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2013. Retrieved 9/10/16, from https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety/data-and-statistics/large-truck-and-bus-crash-facts-2013.

  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58(1), 80–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. A., & Curcuruto, M. (2016). Safety climate in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, S., Shefer, D., Hakkert, A. S., & Hocherman, I. (1991). A critical review of macro models for road accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 23, 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Ho, M., Smith, G. S., & Chen, P. Y. (2006). Safety climate and self-reported injury: Assessing the mediating role of employee safety control. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 425–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., McFadden, A. C., Murphy, L. A., Robertson, M. M., Cheung, J. H., & Zohar, D. (2016). Beyond safety outcomes: An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 248–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., McFadden, A. C., Rineer, J., & Robertson, M. M. (2017). Individual employee’s perceptions of “group-level safety climate” (supervisor referenced) versus “organization-level safety climate” (top management referenced): Associations with safety outcomes for lone workers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 98, 37–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Roetting, M., McDevitt, J. R., Melton, D., & Smith, G. S. (2005). Feedback by technology: Attitudes and opinions of truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Zohar, D., Robertson, M. M., Garabet, A., Lee, J., & Murphy, L. A. (2013). Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 17, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. & Ferrett, E. (2011). Introduction to Health and Safety at Work (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

  • Judge, T. A., Simon, L. S., Hurst, C., & Kelley, K. (2014). What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 199–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (2000). A psychometrics primer. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B., & Bailey, D. E. (1999). When workers are here, there and everywhere: A discussion of the advantages and challenges of telework. Organizational Dynamics, 28, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Huang, Y. H., Cheung, J. H., Chen, Z., & Shaw, W. S. (In press). A systematic review of the safety climate intervention literature: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.

  • Lee, J., Huang, Y. H., Murphy, L. A., Robertson, M. M., & Garabet, A. (2016). Measurement equivalence of a safety climate scale across multiple trucking companies. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Huang, Y. H., Robertson, M. M., Murphy, L. A., Garabet, A., & Chang, W. R. (2014). External validity of a generic safety climate scale for lone workers across different industries and companies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 63, 138–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., & Baumert, J. (Eds.). (2000). Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus software 6.0. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 71–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 946–953.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHTSA. (2014). Traffic safety facts: 2012 data: Large trucks. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811868.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pituch, K. A., Stapleton, L. M., & Kang, J. Y. (2006). A comparison of single sample and bootstrap methods to assess mediation in cluster randomized trials. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 367–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing URL https://www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribisl, K. M., Walton, M. A., Mowbray, C. T., Luke, D. A., Davidson, W. S., & Bootsmiller, B. J. (1996). Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: Review and recommendations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, D. A., Rocha, M., Khattak, A. J., & Belzer, M. H. (2003). Effects of truck driver wages and working conditions on highway safety: Case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1833, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. C., Popp, E., & Mondore, S. (2006). Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: A group-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 681–688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Russell, S. S. (2005). Measurement equivalence of the job descriptive index across Chinese and American workers: Results from confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 709–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effects of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (2008). Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework. Safety Science, 46, 376–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1517–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., & Robertson, M. M. (2014). A mediation model linking supervisory leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 62, 17–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., & Robertson, M. M. (2015). Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate–safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 30, 84–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2003). The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: A cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 567–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Jin Lee

  2. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA

    Jin Lee & Janelle H. Cheung

  3. Liberty Mutual Risk Control Services, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA

    Yueng-Hsiang Huang

  4. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Yueng-Hsiang Huang & Janelle H. Cheung

  5. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

    Robert R. Sinclair

Authors
  1. Jin Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yueng-Hsiang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert R. Sinclair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Janelle H. Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J., Huang, YH., Sinclair, R.R. et al. Outcomes of Safety Climate in Trucking: a Longitudinal Framework. J Bus Psychol 34, 865–878 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9610-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9610-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation