Abstract
Previously applied research has shown independent manding is not likely to emerge when functional communication training (FCT) is implemented in conjunction with dense schedules of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) but does emerge when it is implemented after NCR schedules have been leaned. One interpretation of these data may be that participants are unlikely to acquire mands when functional reinforcers are abolished and that FCT is optimally effective in the presence of relevant establishing operations (EO). However, it is also possible that participants acquire mands during FCT + NCR but only demonstrate learned relations when it becomes necessary to do so, following sufficient exposure to relevant EOs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether independent manding would emerge during no-prompt probes (i.e., when therapeutic contingencies were enforced but not trained) following training sessions that exclusively occurred in contexts in which functional consequences were abolished as reinforcers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
Bloom, S. E., & Lambert, J. M. (2015). Implications for practice: Resurgence and differential reinforcement of alternative responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 781–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.266.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.
Dempsey, C. M., Iwata, B. A., Fritz, J. N., & Rolider, N. U. (2012). Observer training revisited: A comparison of in vivo and video instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 232–827. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-827.
Derosa, N. M., Fisher, W. W., & Steege, M. W. (2015). An evaluation of time in establishing operation on the effectiveness of functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.180.
Ecott, C. L., & Critchfield, T. S. (2004). Noncontingent reinforcement, alternative reinforcement, and the matching law: A laboratory demonstration. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-249.
Fisher, W. W., Greer, B. D., Mitteer, D. R., Fuhrman, A. M., Romani, P. W., & Zangrillo, A. N. (2018). Further evaluation of differential exposure to establishing operations during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.451.
Fritz, J. N., Jackson, L. M., Stiefler, N. A., Wimberly, B. S., & Richardson, A. R. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 509–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.395.
Goh, H., Iwata, B. A., & DeLeon, I. G. (2000). Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-195.
Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., Sullivan, M. T., Acquisto, J., & LeBlanc, L. A. (1998). Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: A summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 31, 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211.
Hagopian, L. P., Kuhn, S. A., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training: Using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2005.43-04.
Hanley, G. P., Jin, C. S., Vanselow, N. R., & Hanaratty, L. A. (2014). Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.106.
Heath, A. K., Ganz, J. B., Parker, R., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0044-3.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982/1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9.
Jessel, J., Hanley, G. P., & Ghaemmaghami, M. (2016). Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses: Thirty replications and reanalysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.316.
Kunnavatana, S., Wolfe, K., & Aguilar, J. (2018). Assessing mand topography preference when developing a functional communication training intervention. Behavior Modification, 42, 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517751437.
Kurtz, P., Boelter, E., Jarmolowicz, D., Chin, M., & Hagopian, L. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2935–2942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.009.
Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407.
Lerman, D. C., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Developing a technology for the use of operant extinction in clinical settings: An examination of basic and applied research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 345–382. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-345.
Lerman, D. C., Iwata, B. A., & Wallace, M. D. (1999). Side effects of extinction: Prevalence of bursting and aggression during the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-1.
Lerman, D. C., Parten, M., Addison, L. R., Vorndran, C. M., Volkert, V. M., & Kodak, T. (2005). A methodology for assessing the functions of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 303–316.
Luczynski, K. C., & Hanley, G. P. (2009). Do children prefer contingencies? An evaluation of the efficacy of and preference for contingent versus noncontingent social reinforcement during play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-511.
Marcus, B. A., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-43.
Marsteller, T. M., & St. Peter, C. C. (2014). Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.l34.
Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Crook, K., Molony, M., Vargo, K. K., et al. (2018). Effects of response preference on resistance to change. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.308.
Rooker, G. W., Jessel, J., Kurtz, P. F., & Hagopian, L. P. (2013). Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: An analysis of 58 applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.76.
Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391716.
Torelli, J. N., Lambert, J. M., Da Fonte, A., Denham, K. N., Jedrzynski, T. M., & Houchins-Juarez, N. J. (2016). Assessing acquisition of and preference for mand topographies during functional communication training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0083-y.
Virues-Otega, J., Iwata, B. A., Fahmie, T. A., & Harper, J. M. (2013). Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.61.
Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9.
Acknowledgements
We thank Courtney Colton, Janey Macdonald, Marissa Mastel, Ellen Vandelaar, and Taylor Puckett for their assistance collecting and summarizing data for this study and for coordinating and delivering high-quality therapeutic services for participants following this study’s conclusion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This submission has been approved by all authors and by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out.
Informed Consent
For all participants, we obtained informed consent before initiating study-related activities.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lambert, J.M., Torelli, J.N., Houchins-Juarez, N.J. et al. The Effect of Abolishing Operations on Mand Acquisition During Functional Communication Training. J Behav Educ 30, 260–279 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09369-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09369-3