Skip to main content
Log in

Facet-Level Personality Relations of the Symptom Dimensions of the Tripartite Model

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tripartite model (Clark and Watson, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 316–336 1991) was developed to explain both the strong comorbidity and the distinction between anxiety and depression. The model includes a shared general distress factor that is most strongly associated with Neuroticism/Negative Emotionality (N/NE); a unique depression factor, anhedonia, which is most strongly associated with low Positive Emotionality/Extraversion; and anxious arousal, a unique anxiety factor that subsequent research has shown to be most strongly related to panic/agoraphobia among the anxiety disorders (e.g., Mineka et al. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 377–412 1998) and to have the weakest link to personality. The present study extends past work by demonstrating that narrower facets of personality domains show nuanced relations that are masked when only the broader domains are examined. Specifically, we investigated facet-level relations of the tripartite model’s symptom dimensions using three hierarchical personality measures (BFI-2, NEO-PI-3, and FI-FFM) and data from three separate samples (Ns = 353–451). In one sample, the tripartite-model dimensions were assessed twice across a 9.5-month interval. At the domain level, N/NE, Extraversion, and Conscientiousness were the strongest predictors of these factors. At the facet level, general distress and anhedonia were most strongly related to N/NE’s Depression facet; anhedonia also was substantially linked to the low Energy/Positive Temperament component of Extraversion. Finally, anxious arousal was best predicted by the Somatic Complaints facet of N/NE. This pattern of results was highly stable across measures, samples, and time points. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed, including connecting these findings to the dimensional Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Prior research using this dataset has explicated relations between various personality factors (including Extraversion and emotion regulation) and a broad range of psychopathology (e.g., Stanton, Rozek, Stasik-O’Brien, Ellickson-Larew, & Watson, 2016; Stanton, Stasik-O’Brien, Ellickson-Larew, & Watson, 2016b; Watson et al. 2015), but none have explored the personality relations of the tripartite constructs.

  2. This dataset was used for an earlier review (Watson et al. 2017) of self-report indicators of negative valence constructs within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).

  3. According to Cohen (1992a, b), r ≥ |,10| represents a small effect, r ≥ |.30| represents a medium effect, and r ≥ |.50| represents a large effect.

  4. As we had used Spearman correlations to calculate bivariate analyses, we ranked the raw data before conducting multiple regressions.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shereen Khoo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Shereen Khoo, Kasey Stanton, Lee Anna Clark, and David Watson declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 71 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, S., Stanton, K., Clark, L.A. et al. Facet-Level Personality Relations of the Symptom Dimensions of the Tripartite Model. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 42, 160–177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09763-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09763-w

Keywords

Navigation