Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of peak overlap in NMR spectra

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peak overlap is one of the major factors complicating the analysis of biomolecular NMR spectra. We present a general method for predicting the extent of peak overlap in multidimensional NMR spectra and its validation using both, experimental data sets and Monte Carlo simulation. The method is based on knowledge of the magnetization transfer pathways of the NMR experiments and chemical shift statistics from the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank. Assuming a normal distribution with characteristic mean value and standard deviation for the chemical shift of each observable atom, an analytic expression was derived for the expected overlap probability of the cross peaks. The analytical approach was verified to agree with the average peak overlap in a large number of individual peak lists simulated using the same chemical shift statistics. The method was applied to eight proteins, including an intrinsically disordered one, for which the prediction results could be compared with the actual overlap based on the experimentally measured chemical shifts. The extent of overlap predicted using only statistical chemical shift information was in good agreement with the overlap that was observed when the measured shifts were used in the virtual spectrum, except for the intrinsically disordered protein. Since the spectral complexity of a protein NMR spectrum is a crucial factor for protein structure determination, analytical overlap prediction can be used to identify potentially difficult proteins before conducting NMR experiments. Overlap predictions can be tailored to particular classes of proteins by preparing statistics from corresponding protein databases. The method is also suitable for optimizing recording parameters and labeling schemes for NMR experiments and improving the reliability of automated spectra analysis and protein structure determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartels C, Güntert P, Billeter M, Wüthrich K (1997) GARANT—a general algorithm for resonance assignment of multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. J Comput Chem 18:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busche AE, Aranko AS, Talebzadeh-Farooji M, Bernhard F, Dötsch V, Iwai H (2009) Segmental isotopic labeling of a central domain in a multidomain protein by protein trans-splicing using only one robust DnaE intein. Angew Chem 48:6128–6131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzolai L, Lysek DA, Perez DR, Güntert P, Wüthrich K (2005) Prion protein NMR structures of chickens, turtles, and frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:651–655

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst RR, Bodenhausen G, Wokaun A (1987) The principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto NK, Kay LE (2000) New developments in isotope labeling strategies for protein solution NMR spectroscopy. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güntert P (2009) Automated structure determination from NMR spectra. Eur Biophys J 38:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wüthrich K (1997) Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 273:283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hefke F, Bagaria A, Reckel S, Ullrich SJ, Dötsch V, Glaubitz C, Güntert P (2011) Optimization of amino acid type- specific 13C and 15N labeling for the backbone assignment of membrane proteins by solution- and solid-state NMR with the UPLABEL algorithm. J Biomol NMR 49:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higman VA, Flinders J, Hiller M, Jehle S, Markovic S, Fiedler S, van Rossum BJ, Oschkinat H (2009) Assigning large proteins in the solid state: a MAS NMR resonance assignment strategy using selectively and extensively 13C-labelled proteins. J Biomol NMR 44:245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst R, Damberger F, Luginbühl P, Güntert P, Peng G, Nikonova L, Leal WS, Wüthrich K (2001) NMR structure reveals intramolecular regulation mechanism for pheromone binding and release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14374–14379

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kainosho M, Güntert P (2009) SAIL—stereo-array isotope labeling. Q Rev Biophys 42:247–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kainosho M, Torizawa T, Iwashita Y, Terauchi T, Ono AM, Güntert P (2006) Optimal isotope labelling for NMR protein structure determinations. Nature 440:52–57

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lian LY, Middleton DA (2001) Labelling approaches for protein structural studies by solution-state and solid-state NMR. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 39:171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Méndez B, Güntert P (2006) Automated protein structure determination from NMR spectra. J Am Chem Soc 128:13112–13122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Méndez B, Pantoja-Uceda D, Tomizawa T, Koshiba S, Kigawa T, Shirouzu M, Terada T, Inoue M, Yabuki T, Aoki M, Seki E, Matsuda T, Hirota H, Yoshida M, Tanaka A, Osanai T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yokoyama S, Güntert P (2004) NMR assignment of the hypothetical ENTH-VHS domain At3g16270 from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biomol NMR 29:205–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motáčková V, Nováček J, Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk A, Kazimierczuk K, Žídek L, Šanderová H, Krásný L, Koźmiński W, Sklenář V (2010) Strategy for complete NMR assignment of disordered proteins with highly repetitive sequences based on resolution-enhanced 5D experiments. J Biomol NMR 48:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumenthaler C, Güntert P, Braun W, Wüthrich K (1997) Automated combined assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional protein structure determination. J Biomol NMR 10:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxenoid K, Kirn HJ, Jacob J, Sönnichsen FD, Sanders CR (2004) NMR assignments for a helical 40 kDa membrane protein. J Am Chem Soc 126:5048–5049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pääkkönen K, Tossavainen H, Permi P, Rakkolainen H, Rauvala H, Raulo E, Kilpeläinen I, Güntert P (2006) Solution structures of the first and fourth TSR domains of F-spondin. Proteins 64:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantoja-Uceda D, López-Méndez B, Koshiba S, Kigawa T, Shirouzu M, Terada T, Inoue M, Yabuki T, Aoki M, Seki E, Matsuda T, Hirota H, Yoshida M, Tanaka A, Osanai T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yokoyama S, Güntert P (2004) NMR assignment of the hypothetical rhodanese domain At4g01050 from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biomol NMR 29:207–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantoja-Uceda D, López-Méndez B, Koshiba S, Inoue M, Kigawa T, Terada T, Shirouzu M, Tanaka A, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yokoyama S, Güntert P (2005) Solution structure of the rhodanese homology domain At4g01050(175–295) from Arabidopsis thaliana. Protein Sci 14:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1986) Numerical recipes. The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reckel S, Sobhanifar S, Schneider B, Junge F, Schwarz D, Durst F, Löhr F, Güntert P, Bernhard F, Dötsch V (2008) Transmembrane segment enhanced labeling as a tool for the backbone assignment of α-helical membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:8262–8267

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt E, Güntert P (2012) A new algorithm for reliable and general NMR resonance assignment. J Am Chem Soc 134:12817–12829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmucki R, Yokoyama S, Güntert P (2009) Automated assignment of NMR chemical shifts using peak-particle dynamics simulation with the DYNASSIGN algorithm. J Biomol NMR 43:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A, Pantoja-Uceda D, Koshiba S, Inoue M, Kigawa T, Terada T, Shirouzu M, Tanaka A, Sugano S, Yokoyama S, Güntert P (2004) NMR assignment of the SH2 domain from the human feline sarcoma oncogene FES. J Biomol NMR 30:463–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A, Pantoja-Uceda D, Koshiba S, Inoue M, Kigawa T, Terada T, Shirouzu M, Tanaka A, Sugano S, Yokoyama S, Güntert P (2005) Solution structure of the Src homology 2 domain from the human feline sarcoma oncogene Fes. J Biomol NMR 31:357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szántay C Jr (2007) NMR and the uncertainty principle: how to and how not to interpret homogeneous line broadening and pulse nonselectivity. I. The fundamentals. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A 30A:309–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szyperski T, Güntert P, Otting G, Wüthrich K (1992) Determination of scalar coupling constants by inverse fourier transformation of in-phase multiplets. J Magn Reson 99:552–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF, Harano Y, Ioannidis YE, Lin J, Livny M, Mading S, Maziuk D, Miller Z, Nakatani E, Schulte CF, Tolmie DE, Wenger RK, Yao HY, Markley JL (2008) BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D402–D408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki T, Otomo T, Oda N, Kyogoku Y, Uegaki K, Ito N, Ishino Y, Nakamura H (1998) Segmental isotope labeling for protein NMR using peptide splicing. J Am Chem Soc 120:5591–5592

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Lichtenberg program of the Volkswagen Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Güntert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hefke, F., Schmucki, R. & Güntert, P. Prediction of peak overlap in NMR spectra. J Biomol NMR 56, 113–123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-013-9727-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-013-9727-9

Keywords

Navigation