Abstract
This paper addresses the mechanical behavior of robocast PCL-Bioglass® scaffolds. These structures can be used as 3rd generation implants in tissue engineering to support the regrowth of damaged tissue, in particular bone. After successful tissue regeneration the scaffolds slowly dissolve leaving no foreign material permanently inside the body. However, to avoid mechanical separation from surrounding tissue they must exhibit similar mechanical properties. The present study introduces a detailed numerical study focusing on the determination of effective mechanical material properties, their anisotropy, and mechanical degradation due to scaffold resorption. In order to accurately capture the complex scaffold geometry, micro-computed tomography scans of actual samples are conducted. The resulting three-dimensional data are directly converted into finite element calculation models. Numerical compressive tests of these unmodified models are repeated for three perpendicular directions to investigate mechanical anisotropy, after which the effect of scaffold degradation due to exposure to body fluid is simulated. To this end, two different resorption models, namely surface erosion and bulk degradation, are applied to the micro-computed tomography data. The modified geometry data are then converted into calculation models and numerical compression tests then allow the prediction of the mechanical properties of partially resorbed scaffolds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.M. Werier, COA Bone graft substitutes in oncology, paediatrics, and hip arthroplasty, Winter ed., 2014.
Hench L, Jones J. New materials and technologies for healthcare. London: The Imperial College Press; 2012.
Van der Stok J, Van Lieshout EMM, El-Massoudi Y, Van Kralingen GH, Patka P. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:739–50.
U.o.A. Department of Materials Engineering and Ceramics, Portugal, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34, 107–118 (2014).
Miranda P, Pajares A, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Guibe F. Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2008;85:218–27.
Carter DR, Hayes WC. Science. New Ser. 1976;194:1174–6.
Tesavibul PA, Felzmann R, Gruber S, Liska R, Thompson I, Boccaccini AR, Stampfl J. Mater. Lett. 2012;74:81–4.
Chen Q, Mohn D, Stark WJ. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011;4188:94.
Jones JR, Ehrenfried LM, Hench LL. Biomaterials. 2006;27:964–73.
Woodruff MA, Dietmar HW. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010;35:1217–56
Hoppe A, Guldal NS, Boccaccini AR. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2757–74.
Fiedler T, Videira AC, Bártolo P, Strauch M, Murch GE, Ferreira JMF. On the mechanical properties of PLC–bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated via BioExtrusion. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015;57:288–93.
ISO 13314:2011. Mechanical testing of metals—Ductility testing—Compression test for porous and cellular metals. 2011.
Chen W, Meng F, Cheng R, Deng C, Feijen J, Zhong Z. J. Control. Release. 2014;190:398–414.
Yang C-S, Wu H-C, Sun J-S, Hsiao H-M, Wang T-W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5:10985–94.
Sun H, Mei L, Song C, Cui X, Wang P. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1735–40.
Hakkarainen M. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2002;157:129–30.
Pulkkinen M, Malin M, Böhm J, Tarvainen T, Wirth T, Seppälä J, Järvinen K. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009;36:310–9.
M.A. Woodruff, H.W. Dietmar, QUT Web Site (2010).
Chang H-M, Prasannan A, Tsai H-C, Jhu J-J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014;313:828–33.
Meseguer-Dueñas JM, Más-Estellés J, Castilla-Cortázar I, Escobar Ivirico JL, Vidaurre A. J. Mater. Sci. 2011;22:11–8.
S.D. Badilatti, L. Sommerhalder, R. Muller, Swiss Society of Biomedical Engineering Annual Meeting 2014 Abstracts (2014).
Marcolongo MA, Jamison D. Advances in Biomaterials for Clinical. In: Winkelstein BA, editor. Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012. p. 563.
Siepmann J, Gopferich A. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;48:229–47.
Edlund U, Albertsson AC. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2002;157:84.
G. Vladimír, Elektrotechnika, Študentské práce (2010).
Shore SW, Unnikrishnan GU, Hussein AI, Morgan EF. Bone Biomechanics, Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Winkelstein: CRC Press; 2012. p. 4–34.
Mosekilde L. Bone. 1989;10:425–32.
Rahaman NM. Tissue Engineering Using Ceramics and Polymers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2014.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects funding scheme (Project Number DP130101377).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waygood, J., Murch, G.E. & Fiedler, T. Directional and temporal variation of the mechanical properties of robocast scaffold during resorption. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 26, 229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5560-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5560-x