Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture properties of epoxy polymers modified with cross-linked and core–shell rubber particles

  • Polymers & biopolymers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the toughness of epoxy polymers, cross-linked rubber (CLR) particles or core–shell rubber (CSR) particles can be blended into the epoxy matrix. Particle cavitation is thought to be the main toughening mechanism of rubber-modified epoxies. Although CLR-modified epoxies have not been studied in depth previously, it is expected that the toughening mechanism differs from that of CSR-modified epoxies because void formation is less likely to occur. We formed the CLR- and CSR-modified epoxy resins using nanosized acrylonitrile butadiene CLR particles, which showed good compatibility with the epoxy matrix and the CSR particles with a rubbery core surrounded by a glassy shell. The toughening mechanism was examined by comparing the fracture behavior, fracture surfaces, and process zones via tensile and fracture toughness testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and transmission optical microscopy (TOM). There was a difference in the characteristics of the R-curves between the CLR- and CSR-modified epoxies. In addition, the SEM and TEM observations indicated that there was a difference in the fracture mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Deformation and fracture behavior of a rubber toughened epoxy:1 microstructure and fracture studies. Polymer 24:1341–1354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Hunston DL (1983) Deformation and fracture behavior of a rubber toughened epoxy:2 failure criteria. Polymer 24:1355–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. part 1 mechanical studies. J Mater Sci 21:2462–2474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1986) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. part 2 microscopy studies. J Mater Sci 21:2475–2488. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers: part 1 finite element analysis studies. J Mater Sci 27:2753–2762. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers: part 2 a quantitative description of the microstructure-fracture property relationship. J Mater Sci 27:2763–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J, Kinloch AJ, Sprenger S, Taylor AC (2013) The mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms of an epoxy polymer modified with polysiloxane-based core-shell particles. Polymer 54:4276–4289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Quan D, Ivankovic A (2015) Effect of core-shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer. Polymer 66:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keller A, Chong HM, Taylor AC, Dransfeld C, Masania K (2017) Core-shell rubber nanoparticle reinforcement and processing of high toughness fast-curing epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 147:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.05.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen TKL, Soares BG, Ducher-Remeau J, Livi S (2017) Dual functions of ILs in the core-shell particle reinforced epoxy networks: curing agent vs dispersion aids. Compos Sci Technol 140:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Quan D, Murphy N, Cardiff P, Ivankovic A (2018) The intrinsic fracture property of a rubber-modified epoxy adhesive: geometrical transferability. Eng Frac Mech 203:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinloch AJ, Lee SH, Taylor AC (2014) Improving the fracture toughness and the cyclic-fatigue resistance of epoxy-polymer blends. Polymer 55:6325–6334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Velthem P, Ballout W, Horion J, Janssens Y-A, Destoop V, Pardoen T (2016) Morphology and fracture properties of toughened highly crosslinked epoxy composites: a comparative study between high and low Tg tougheners. Compos B B101:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ngah SA, Taylor AC (2016) Toughening performance of glass fibre composites with core-shell rubber and silica nanoparticle modified matrices. Compos A A80:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueda M, Shishido N, Ikeda T, Miyazaki N (2009) Measurement and analysis of the strain field around a crack tip in epoxy resin modified with solid rubber particles. Trans Jpn Soc Comput Eng Sci Paper No.20090007 (in Japanese).

  16. Ueda M, Shishido N, Ikeda T, Miyazaki N (2009) Effect of bond thickness on the fracture toughness and strain field around a crack tip in adhesive joints using epoxy resin modified with solid rubber particles. J Jpn Soc Mech Eng 75:1516–1525 (in Japanese)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Imanaka M, Fujimami A, Suzuki Y (2000) Fracture and yield behavior of adhesively bonded joints under triaxial stress conditions. J Mater Sci 35:2481–2491. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004769719895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Imanaka M, Nakamura Y, Nishimura A, Iida T (2003) Fracture toughness of robber-modified epoxyes:effect of plastic deformability of the matrix phase. Compos Sci Technol 63:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00175-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Imanaka M, Motohashi S, Nishi K, Nakamura Y, Kimoto M (2009) Crack-growth behavior of epoxy adhesives modified with liquid rubber and cross-linked rubber particles under mode I loading. Int J Adhes Adhesives 29:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.11.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kinloch AJ, Guild FJ (1996) Predictive modeling of the properties and toughness of rubber-modified epoxies. Adv Chem Series 252:1–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper V (2010) PhD Thesis, School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University College Dublin.

  22. Hancock JW, Mackenzie AC (1976) On the mechanisms of ductile fracture in high strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states. J Mech Phys Solids 24:147–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tratting G, Antretter T, Pippan R (2008) Fracture of austenitic steel subjected to a wide range of stress triaxiality ratios and crack deformation modes. Eng Frac Mech 75:223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper V, Ivankovic A, Karac A, Ncauliffe D, Murphy N (2012) Effect of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughed epoxy adhesive joints. Polymer 53:5540–5553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics, Fundamentals and applications, 3rd ed. Taylor & Francis.

  26. ASTM D 6068–96 (2002) Standard test methods for determination J-R curves of plastic materials, ASTM standards.

  27. Hsie T, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45:1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4064-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) Influence of particle sizes and particle size distribution on toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxies. J Mater Sci 26:3828–3844. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bagheri PRA (1996) Role of blend morphology in rubber-toughened polymers. J Mater Sci 31:3945–3954. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for their English language editing services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Imanaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Chris Cornelius.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imanaka, M., Narita, I., Nakamura, Y. et al. Fracture properties of epoxy polymers modified with cross-linked and core–shell rubber particles. J Mater Sci 56, 1842–1854 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05339-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05339-2

Navigation