Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Systematic Review on Continuing Education of Teachers for Educational Robotics

  • Survey Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review paper covers most recent works on continuous formation of teachers for Educational Robotics. Our approach uses a systematic review methodology with a search for manuscripts related to teachers training and robotics in education keywords in order to select a set of papers that are strictly related to the topic. These papers are further analyzed in relation to several aspects besides teacher continuing education. We observe that project continuity is one of these aspects that is present in about half of the works. Nowadays, a growing on the pedagogical use of robotics is also observed in the education system of several countries. The works that are based on public policies supported by institutions at local or national levels turn out to be the ones that have more continuity as an effective training proposal. Further, from the observed projects, those that have implemented more consolidated educational practices for Educational Robotics are the ones that have a longer-term existence. Finally, our findings indicate that a focus on the use of robotics as a tool for trans-disciplinary contents is fast growing, overall. Roboticists allied with Educators play an important role in the process, as they are developing methodologies that allied with cutting edge techniques and materials are turning educational robotics into a very useful resource for enhancing the learning-teaching process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data and design materials produced from or for this study can be requested to the authors by e-mail (see corresponding author e-mail).

References

  1. Zilli, S.D.R.: Educational robotics in elementary school: perspectives and practices (in Portuguese). Master’s thesis, Master’s Thesis at Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil. Available at http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/86930 (2004)

  2. Moro, M., Agatolio, F., Menegatti, E.: The development of robotic-enhanced curricula for the roboesl project/premises, objectives, preliminary results. ROBOESL Conference Proceedings 53–62. https://roboesl.eu/conference/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Moro.pdf (2016)

  3. Yiannoutsou, N., Nikitopoulou, S., Kynigos, C., Gueorguiev, I., Fernandez, J.A.: Activity plan template: a mediating tool for supporting learning design with robotics. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R. (eds.) Robotics in Education, pp 3–13. Springer, Cham (2017)

  4. Sa, S.T.D.L., Yanaguibashi, E.A., Goncalves, L.M.G., Burlamaqui, A.M.F., Barros, R.P., Fernandes, C.D.C.: Educaval: towards assessment of educational robotics softwares. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 15 (4), 720–728 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7896400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrios-Aranibar, D., Gurgel, V., Santos, M., Araujo, G.R., Roza, V.C., Nascimento, R.A., Silva, A.F., Silva, A.R.S., Goncalves, L.M.G.: Roboeduc: a software for teaching robotics to technological excluded children using lego prototypes. In: 2006 IEEE 3rd Latin American Robotics Symposium, pp. 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS.2006.334332 (2006)

  6. Almeida, F., Yanaguibashi, E.A., Silva, S.R., Sa, S.T.L., Gonçalves, L. M. G.: Blockeduc - a tool for visual programming of robots on dynamic environment w-educ. Workshop of Robotics in Education (2017)

  7. do Nascimento, L.M., Neri, D.S., Erreira, T.D.N., Pereira, F.D.A., Albuquerque, E.A.Y., Gonçalves, L.M.G., Sá, S.T.D.L.: Sbotics - gamified framework for educational robotics. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 102(17). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01364-8 (2021)

  8. da Silva-Junior, A.G., Gonçalves, L.M.G., de Paula Caurin, G.A., Tamanaka, G.T.B., Hernandes, A.C., Aroca, R.V.: bipes: Block based integrated platform for embedded systems. IEEE Access 8, 197955–197968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aroca, R.V., Gomes, R.B., Tavares, D.M., Souza, A.A.S., Burlamaqui, A.M.F., Caurin, G.A.P., Goncalves, L.M.G.: Increasing students’ interest with low-cost cellbots. IEEE Trans. Educ. 56(1), 3–8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2214782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aroca, R.V., Pazelli, T.F., Tonidandel, F., Filho, A.C., Simes, A.S., Colombini, E.L., Burlamaqui, A.M., Goncalves, L.M.: Brazilian robotics olympiad: a successful paradigm for science and technology dissemination. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 13(5), 1729881416658166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881416658166

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hertz, M.B.: Full STEAM Ahead: Why Arts are Essential in a STEM Education Article available in the web at https://www.edutopia.org/blog/arts-are-essential-in-stem-mary-beth-hertz (2016)

  12. Patino-Escarcina, R.E., Barrios-Aranibar, D., Bernedo-Flores, L.S., Alsina, P.J., Gonçalves, L. M. G.: A methodological approach to the learning of robotics with edurosc-kids. J Intell Robot Syst 102, 34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01400-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveira, D.S., Sa, S.T.L., Fernandes, C.C., Silva, S.R., Albuquerque, E.A.Y., Pereira, F., Garcia, L.T.S., Goncalves, L.M.G.: Issues on teaching formation for educational robotics: A case study with elementary public state school teachers in natal, brazil. Educational Robotics: status, Problems Prospects (Digest of articles International Scientific and Practical Conference) (2017)

  14. Oliveira, D.S.D.: Continued training of teachers for pedagogical innovation through educational robotics at escola estadual presidente kennedy (in portuguese). Master’s thesis, Master Thesis at Graduate Program in Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. Available at https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/27424 (2019)

  15. You, H.S., Kapila, V.: Effectiveness of professional development / integration of educational robotics into science and math curricula. In: 124th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition 2017, vol. 16, pp. 11293–11298 (2017)

  16. Oliveira, D.S.D.: Continuing education in educational robotics: Implementation of a public policy in the natal municipal network (in Portuguese). Master’s thesis, Doctorate’s Thesis at Graduate Program in Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. Available at https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12002 (2022)

  17. Wilson, A.L., Hayes, E.: Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. Wiley, Chicago (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ross-Gordon, J.M., Rose, A.D., Kasworm, C.E.: Foundations of adult and continuing education. Wiley (2017)

  19. Oliveira, D.S., Curvelo, C.D.C.F., Melo, J.C.P., de Santana, O.V., Barrios-Aranibar, D., Patino-Escarcina, R.E., Garcia, L.T.D.S., Garcia Gonçalves, L. M.: Edurosc-Prof: continuous education method for teacher formation in educational robotics for K-12 teaching. In: 2021 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2021 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2021 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), vol. 1, pp. 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE54079.2021.9605449 (2021)

  20. Fernandes, C.C., Santana-Júnior, O.V., Oliveira, D., Garcia, L.T.S., Burlamaqui, A.M.F., Melo, J.C.P., Sá, S.T.L., Soares, A.A.A.F., Souza, A.A.S., Barrios-Aranibar, D., Patiño-Escarcina, R.E., Fabro, J.A.A., Burlamaqui, A.A.R.S.S., Azevedo, S.O., Kato, E.R.R., Inoue, R.S., Hernandes, A.C., Pazelli, T.F.A.T., Ogashawara, O., Araujo, L.A.O., Fontes, J.a.V.C., Hai, A.A., Vivaldini, K.C.T., Neris, V.P.A., Neris, L.O., Aroca, R.V., Alsina, P.J., Gonçalves, L.M.G.: Demystifying educational robotics with focore: from very low cost software and hardware technologies to the development of new methodologies and curriculum for continuing teacher education and teaching of brazilian basic education students. In: 2020 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE51543.2020.9307032 (2020)

  21. CAPES-Brazil: Acess to CAFe - ministério da educação/CAPES Available at https://www-periodicos-capes-gov-br.ezl.periodicos.capes.gov.br/index.php/acesso-cafe.html (2022)

  22. Papert, S.: Constructionism: A New Opportunity for Elementary Science Education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. NSF Abstract #8751190, available at http://dailypapert.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/constructionism-NSF-proposal.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2021 (1986)

  23. Barrios-Aranibar, D., Gurgel, V., Santos, M., Araujo, G.R., Roza, V.C., Nascimento, R.A., Silva, A.F., Silva, A.R.S., Goncalves, L.M.G.: Roboeduc: a software for teaching robotics to technological excluded children using lego prototypes. In: 2006 IEEE 3rd Latin American Robotics Symposium, pp. 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS.2006.334332 (2006)

  24. da Silva, A.F.: Roboeduc: A learning methodology with eucational robotics (in Portuguese). PhD thesis, Doctorate’s Thesis at Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. available at https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/15128 (2009)

  25. Maliuk, K.D.: Educational robotics as an investigative scenario in math classes (in Portuguese) Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2009)

  26. Araújo, C. A. P., Mafra, J.R.E.S.: Robotics and Education: Theoretical Essays and Experimental Practices (in Portuguese), 1st edn., p. 156 Editora CRV. https://doi.org/10.24824/978854440669.4 (2015)

  27. Mafra, J.R.E.S., Rodrigues, Z.K.A.B.: Robótica educacional como ferramenta mediadora: Abordando conceitos matemáticos na formação de professores. REAMEC - Rede Amazô,nica de Educação em Ciências e Matemática 9(1), 21025 (2020). https://doi.org/10.26571/reamec.v9i1.11823

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robocup-Junior: Robocup Junior - Creating a learning environment for today, fostering technological advancement for tomorrow Available at https://junior.robocup.org/ (2022)

  29. Robocup-Brazil: Brazilian Robotics Olimpics (OBR) Available at https://www.obr.org.br/ (2022)

  30. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. EASE’08, pp. 68–77. BCS Learning & Development Ltd (2008)

  31. Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26(2), 91–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C.E.A.: Systematic review or scoping review? guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x (2018)

  33. Wohlin, C.: Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. EASE ’14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268 (2014)

  34. Tochachek, D., Lapes, J., Fuglik, V.: Developing technological knowledge and programming skills of secondary schools students through the educational robotics projects. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 217, 377–381 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Scaradozzi, D. E. A.: Implementation and assessment methodologies of teachers’ training courses for stem activities. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 24(2), 247–268 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alimisis, D., Arlegui, J., Fava, N., Frangou, S., Ionita, S., Menegatti, E., Monfalcon, I.S., Moro, M., Papanikolaou, K., Pina, A.: Introducing robotics to teachers and schools/ experiences from the terecop project. https://www.terecop.eu/downloads/constructionism2010paper.pdf, vol. 1, pp 1–10 (2010)

  37. Alimisis, D.: Teacher training in educational robotics / the roboesl project paradigm. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 24(2), 279–290 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Castro, E.: Design and impact of a teacher training course, and attitude change concerning educational robotics. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10(5), 669–685 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. D’Abreu, B.L., João, V.V., João, V.V.B.: Robótica pedaógica e currículo do ensino fundamental / atuação em uma escola municipal do projeto uca. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação 23(03), 56 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ensign, T.I.: Elementary educators’ attitudes about the utility of educational robotics and their ability and intent to use it with students. Master’s thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA. Available at https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd (2017)

  41. Esteve-Mon, F. M. E. A.: The development of computational thinking in student teachers through an intervention with educational robotics. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice 18, 139–152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.28945/4442

    Google Scholar 

  42. González, D. S. R., García, Y.: Desarrollo de habilidades cientf́icas en la formación inicial de profesores de ciencias y matemática. Educación y educadores 17(2), 3 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jurado, E., Fonseca, D., Coderch, J., Canaleta, X.: Social steam learning at an early age with robotic platforms: A case study in four schools in Spain. Sensors 20(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133698 (2020)

  44. Kaya, E., anf Hasan Deniz, A.N., Yesilyurt, E.: Introducing engineering design to a science teaching methods course through educational robotics and exploring changes in views of preservice elementary teachers. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 2, 47 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kucuk, S., Sisman, B.: Pre-service teachers’ experiences in learning robotics design and programming. Informatics in Education 17(2), 301–320 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Martinez, M.C., Rodriguez Pesce, E.S.: Teacher training in robotics: an experience in a blended course (in Spanish). Revista Tecnología y Ciencia (35) 82–93. https://doi.org/10.33414/rtyc.35.82-93.2019 (2019)

  47. Morales, C.F., Hervás-Gómez, C., Martín-Padilla, A. H., Fernández-Márquez, E.: Contextualization of virtual training in educational robotics for rural teachers in Peru (in Spanish). REXE-Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación 2(2), 71–82 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Negrini, L.: Teacher Training in Educational Robotics. In: Lepuschitz, W., Merdan, M., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds.) Robotics in Education, pp 92–97. Springer, Cham (2019)

  49. Ortiz, A.M., Bos, B., Smith, S.: The power of educational robotics as an integrated stem learning experience in teacher preparation programs. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 44(5), 42–47 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Román-Graván, P., Hervás-Gómez, C., Martín-Padilla, A.H., Fernández-Márquez, E.: Perceptions about the use of educational robotics in the initial training of future teachers: A study on steam sustainability among female teachers. Sustainability 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104154 (2020)

  51. Martinyuk, O.S.: Features of methods of teaching students (teachers of physics and general technical disciplines to be) fundamentals of microelectronics and educational robotics. Scientific hour of the National Pedagogical University named after MP Drahomanov. Series 3: Physics and Mathematics in Higher and Secondary Schools 3 (14), 50 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pustylnik, P.N.: Improving the Methodology of Training of Bachelors of Technological Education under the Influence of Development of Educational Robotics. Technical Report, Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2017-4-16-21 (2017)

  53. Campos, F.R.: Educational robotics in brazil: open questions, challenges and future perspectives. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educaç,ão 12(4), 2108–2121 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Barros, R.P., Burlamaqui, A.M.F., Azevedo, S.O., de, L., Sá, S. T., Gonçalves, L. M. G., da S Burlamaqui, A.A.R.S.: Cardbot - assistive technology for visually impaired in educational robotics: Experiments and results. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 15(3), 517–527 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7867603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Torquato, P.: O robô ajuda? estudo do impacto do uso de robótica educativa como estratégia de aprendizagem na disciplina de aplicações informáticas. Congresso Internacional de TIC e Educação 2578–2583 (2012)

  56. de Caldas Melo, B., Sant’Ana, G.: The practice of Active Methodologies: student’s comprehension while author of teaching-learning process (in Portuguese). Com ciências saúde (2012)

  57. Gemignani, E.Y.M.Y.: Teacher training and active teaching-learning methodologies: teaching for understanding (in Portuguese). Revista Fronteira das Educação [online], Recife, Brazil. http://www.fronteirasdaeducacao.org/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/14 (2013)

  58. Morán, J.: Changing education with active methodologies (in Portuguese). Coleção Mídias Contemporâneas. Convergências Midiáticas, Educação e Cidadania: aproximações jovens. http://uepgfocafoto.wordpress.com/ (2015)

  59. Aroca, R.V., Gomes, R.B., Tavares, D.M., Souza, A.A.S., Burlamaqui, A.M.F., Caurin, G.A.P., Goncalves, L.M.G.: Increasing students’ interest with low-cost cellbots. IEEE Trans. Educ. 56(1), 3–8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2214782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lego: First Lego League (FLL) - Inspiring Youth Through Hands-on STEM Learning. Available at http://www.firstlegoleague.org/ Accessed on August (2021)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil, and the National Research Council (CNPq) for the partial financing of this project, and the Municipal Government of Natal, Brazil, for allowing the projects and experiments with Educational Robotics.

Funding

This work is partially supported by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil and by CNPq Brazil under grant 311640/2018-4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; the analysis, acquisition, and assembly of material and equipment; drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content; and approved the version to be submitted, as described next. Denilton Oliveira: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis and investigation, Writing - original draft preparation. Luciane Garcia: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis and investigation, Writing - review and editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision. Luiz M. G. Gonçalves: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis and investigation, Writing - original draft preparation, Writing - review and editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision. In addition, all authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luiz M. G. Gonçalves.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests nor competing interests for this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira, D.S., Garcia, L.T.S. & Gonçalves, L.M.G. A Systematic Review on Continuing Education of Teachers for Educational Robotics. J Intell Robot Syst 107, 24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01804-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01804-z

Keywords

Navigation