Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Improved Neurolinear Method to Two Other Novel Feature Extraction Techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares Neurolinear feature extraction technique to two other feature extraction techniques. The author has developed all three methods recently, but in this paper, Neurolinear method has been improved even further. The study is performed in respect to performance, accuracy and suitability for visualisation. Experimental study is performed on a variety of datasets from numerous domains: Chemistry, biology, finance etc. In total, 19 real and two artificial datasets were used. Comparison is performed in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy. Results show that Neurolinear method achieves best accuracy while Best directions method is not so accurate but often much faster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raudys, A.: A nonparametric data mapping technique for active initialization of the multilayer perceptron. In: Amin, A., et al. (eds.) Advances in Pattern Recognition, pp. 989–996. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1998)

  2. Raudys, A., Long, J.A.: MLP based linear feature extraction for nonlinearly separable data. Pattern Analysis & Applications 4(4), 227–234 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Raudys, A.: High speed associative memories for feature extraction and visualisation. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 24(9/10), 1327–1339 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haykin, S.: In: Edition, S. (ed.) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan College, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sammon, J.W.: A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput. 18, 401–409 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foley, D.H., Sammon, J.W.J.: An optimal set of discriminant vectors. IEEE Trans. Comput. 24, 281–289 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Raudys, A.: Boosting neural network feature extraction by reduced accuracy activation functions. Pattern Recogn. 36(6), 1343–1354 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Raudys, A.: A Non-parametric data mapping technique for active initialisation of the multilayer perceptron. In: Joint IAPR Int. Workshops/SSPR'98 and SPR'98. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1998)

  9. Lloyd, S.P.: Least squares quantisation in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28(2), 129–137 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Light, W. (ed.): Advances in Numerical Analysis: Wavelets, Subdivision Algorithms, and Radial Basis Functions. Clarendon, Oxford (1992)

  12. Austin, J.: ADAM: A distributed associative memory for scene analysis. In: First International Conference on Neural Networks. San Diego (1987)

  13. Austin, J.: Distributed associative memories for high-speed symbolic reasoning. Int. J. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 82, 223–233 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Austin, J.: An associative neural architecture for invariant pattern classification. In: IEE International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. IEE Conf. (1989)

  15. Austin, J.: High speed invariant pattern recognition using adaptive neural networks. In: IEE Proceedings of Conference on Image Processing and its Applications. IEE Conference Publication, University of Warwick, UK (1989)

  16. Austin, J., Lees, K., Kennedy, J.: Reasoning with Neural Networks. In IEE Colloquium “Real Time Knowledge Based Systems” (1995)

  17. Austin, J., Lees, K.: A search engine based on neural correlation matrix memories. Neurocomputing 35(1–4): 55–72 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, L.: Handbook of Genetic Algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold (1991)

  19. Raudys, A., Long, J.A.: Modelling company credit ratings using a number of classification techniques. In: Conference on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saudargiene, A.: Structurization of the covariance matrix by process type and block diagonal models in the classifier design. Informatica 10(2), 245–269 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aistis Raudys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raudys, A. Comparative Study of Improved Neurolinear Method to Two Other Novel Feature Extraction Techniques. J Intell Robot Syst 46, 163–180 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-006-9058-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-006-9058-0

Key words

Navigation