Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a rapid extirpation of a strong population of globally threatened butterfly, Colias myrmidone, from the White Carpathians, Czech Republic. The area is renowned for a high plant and insect diversity associated with savannah-like Carpathian meadows, traditionally managed by mowing once a year and subsequent autumn grazing. Although many meadows fell victim to land consolidation schemes in the 1970s and 1980s, over 2000 hectares have been preserved in a dense network of reserves. The reserve management practised since the mid-1990s has consisted of uniform machine mowing of entire areas and this was further accelerated after accession of the Czech Republic to the EU, when agri-environmental schemes (AES) required two cuts per year. This starkly conflicted with the life history of C. myrmidone, because both spring and autumn cuts interfere with larval development. Despite intensive surveys, only five and then two C. myrmidone individuals were seen in the area in 2005 and 2006, respectively, rendering the species effectively extinct. Conservation authorities failed by neglecting early warning signals issued by amateur entomologists, and by ignoring the basic tenets of conservation of insect diversity, such as the need to maintain heterogeneity of resources. Unless AES provide for this crucial aspect of habitat suitability for invertebrates, they may turn from a great hope into a massive failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure: the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer O, Erhardt A (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: Rethinking conservation practices. Conserv Biol 14:746–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benes J, Konvicka M, Dvorak J, Fric Z, Havelda Z, Pavlicko A, Vrabec V, Weidenhoffer Z (eds) (2002) Butterflies of the Czech Republic: distribution and conservation I, II. SOM, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch D, Werdenberg N, Erhardt A (2006) Pollination crisis in the butterfly-pollinated wild carnation Dianthus carthusianorum. New Phytologist 169:699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CHKO Bile Karpaty (1997) Plan pece o CHKO Bile Karpaty pro obdobi 1.1.1998-31.12.2007 [Management plan for LPA Bile Karpaty] Available at: http://www.bilekarpaty.ochranaprirody.cz/res/data/038/005481.pdf

  • Chladek F (1998) Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Geradflügler (Orthoptera s.l.) aus dem Nationalen Naturschutzgebiet Čertoryje im Gebirge Bílé Karpaty. Tetrix 8:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Freese A, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) The decline of Colias myrmidone at the western edge of its range and notes on its habitat requirements. Biologia 60:607–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera – Sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Asher J, Brereton T, Roy D, Warren M (2006) The State of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Nature Bureau, Newbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese A, Dolek M, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) Biology, distribution, and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) in Bavaria and its situation in other European countries. J Res Lepidoptera 38:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieshuber J (2006) Revision of Colias myrmidone (Esper, 1771) (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Hélios 7:84–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm A, Hanski I, Partel M (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 9:72–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hlobilova I (1985) Antropické vlivy v lučních společenstvech Bílých Karpat a rozšíření vstavačovitých [Anthropogenous changes in meadows in the White Carpathians and local distribution of orchids]. Unpublished thesis, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic

  • Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas J, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongepierova I, Bezdecka P, Jagos B (2004) Plán péče o NPR Čertoryje na období 2005–2014 [Management plan for Certoryje National nature reserve, 2005–2014]. Technical document, CHKO Bile Karpaty.

  • Jongepierova I, Jongepier JW, Klimes L (1994) Obnova druhově bohatých luk v NPR Čertoryje [Restoring species-rich grasslands in Certoryje National nature reserve]. Příroda (Praha) 1:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N (2001) Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413: 723–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J, Fernandez F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Johl R, Knop E, Kruess A, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett 9:243–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klimes L (1995) Small-scale distribution of species richness in a grassland (Bile Karpaty Mts, Czech Republic). Folia Geobot Phytotax 30:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimes L, Jongepierova I, Jongepier JW (2000) Vliv obnovení pravidelného kosení na louky v Bílých Karpatech [The effect of mowing on a previously abandoned meadow: a ten-year experiment] Priroda (Praha) 17:7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Benes J (2005) Stav a změny biodiverzity denních motýlů [Butterfly biodiversity and its changes]. In: Vackar D (ed) Indikátory změny biodiverizty. Academia, Prague, pp. 116–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Benes J, Fric Z, Cizek O (2004) Natura 2000 a denní motýli [Natura 2000 and butterflies]. Ochrana prirody 59:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kralicek M, Gottwald A (1984) Motyli jihovychodni Moravy I. [Butterflies of Southeast Moravia I.]. Museum Uhersky Brod & OV CSOP, Uherske Hradiste

  • Kudrna O (2002) The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Oedippus 20:1–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna O, Mayer L (1990) Grundlagen zu einem Artenhilfsprogramm fur Colias myrmidone (Esper, 1780) in Bayern. Oedippus 1:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wang Z, Xu R (2006) Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands. J Insect Conserv 10:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loertsher M, Erhardt A, Zettel J (1995) Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaic-like habitat: the role of nectar sources. Ecography 18:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MG (2000) The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands. Biol Conserv 95:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ockinger E, Smith HG (2006) Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 149:526–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ouin A, Aviron S, Dover J, Burel F (2004) Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agri Ecosyst Environ 103:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poyry J, Luoto M, Paukkunen J, Pykala J, Raatikainen K, Kuussaari M (2006) Different responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient of vegetation height: an indicator of the vertebrate grazing intensity and successional age. Oikos 115:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Predovnik Z, Verovnik R (2004) New records of rare pierids (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Slovenia. Natura Sloveniae 6:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc London B 267:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1995) Why small cold-blooded insects pose different conservation problems to birds in modern landscapes. Ibis 137:S112–S119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay CAM (2002) The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:315–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment Series No. 99. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst J (2000) Colias du Monde. Goecke & Evers, Keltern

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallington TJ, Hobbs RJ, Moore SA (2005) Implications of Current Ecological Thinking for Biodiversity Conservation: a Review of the Salient Issues. Ecol Soc 10(1):15 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art15/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis De Vries MF, Poschold P, Willems JH (2002) Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol Conserv 104:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring P (2001) Grazing and cutting as conservation management tools: The need for a cautious approach, with some examples of rare moths which have been adversely affected. Entomol Rec J Var 113:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidemann HJ (1995) Tagfalter beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch Verlag

  • Wenzel M, Schmitt T, Weitzel M, Seitz A (2006) The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: A conservation problem. Biol Conserv 128:542–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham MJ (2007) Will agri-environment schemes deliver substantial biodiversity gain, and if not why not? J Appl Ecol 44:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The information presented here would not exist without several hundreds of recorders participating in Czech butterfly recording. Particular thanks J. Uricar for organising the detailed survey of the White Carpathians, and to J. Holomek, M. Hrouzek, A. Pavlicko, P. Snajdara, V. Tomecek and M. Zapletal for sharing their observations regarding C. myrmidone. H. Höttinger, Z. Varga and H. Kalivoda discussed with us the current situation in Austria, Hungary and Slovakia. M. Dolek invited us to a Myrmidone discussion group, through which we connected with colleagues from across Europe interested in conservation of the butterfly. Matthew Sweney corrected the English. Funding was provided by the Czech Department of the Environment (VaV/620/1/03, 620/2/03 and 620/12/03), the Czech Academy of Sciences (600070601) and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (206/03/H034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Konvicka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konvicka, M., Benes, J., Cizek, O. et al. How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold. J Insect Conserv 12, 519–525 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9092-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9092-7

Keywords

Navigation