Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).

Objectives

We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.

Results

Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%; P = 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (P = 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (P = 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 2019;321:1261–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Piorkowski C, Hindricks G, Schreiber D, et al. Electroanatomic reconstruction of the left atrium, pulmonary veins, and esophagus compared with the “true anatomy” on multislice computed tomography in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3:317–27. S1547–5271(05)02419–7 [pii].

  3. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111:1100–5. 01.CIR.0000157153.30978.67 [pii].

  4. Mortsell D, Arbelo E, Dagres N, et al. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a study of outcome and safety based on the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry and the Swedish Catheter Ablation Registry. Europace. 2019;21(4):581–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy239.

  5. Stollberger C, Pulgram T, Finsterer J. Neurological consequences of atrioesophageal fistula after radiofrequency ablation in atrial fibrillation. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:884–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.105.

  6. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. J Arrhythm. 2017;33(5):369–409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vassallo F, Cunha C, Serpa E, et al. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: initial results J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):1877–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14110. 

  8. Parikh V, Swarup V, Hantla J, et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel preshaped nitinol esophageal deviator to successfully deflect the esophagus and ablate left atrium without esophageal temperature rise during atrial fibrillation ablation: the DEFLECT GUT study. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(9):1321–7.

  9. Leung LW, Gallagher MM, Santangeli P, et al. Esophageal cooling for protection during left atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020;59(2):347–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00661-5.

  10. Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, Deneke T, Michaud GF. Esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula caused by ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2017;136(13):1247–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khairy P, Dubuc M. Transcatheter cryoablation part I: preclinical experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31(1):112–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. John RM, Kapur S, Ellenbogen KA, Koneru JN. Atrioesophageal fistula formation with cryoballoon ablation is most commonly related to the left inferior pulmonary vein. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(2):184–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh SM, d’Avila A, Doshi SK, Brugge WR, Bedford RA, Mela T, et al. Esophageal injury and temperature monitoring during atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(3):162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakagawa H, Seres KA, Jackman WM. Limitations of esophageal temperature-monitoring to prevent esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(3):150–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll BJ, Contreras-Valdes FM, Heist EK, et al. Multi-sensor esophageal temperature probe used during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with increased intraluminal temperature detection and increased risk of esophageal injury compared to single-sensor probe. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:958–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12180.

  16. Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, et al. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(4):467–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kottmaier M, Popa M, Bourier F, Reents T, Cifuentes J, Semmler V, et al. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2020;22(3):388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tschabrunn CM, Silverstein J, Berzin T, et al. Comparison between single- and multi-sensor oesophageal temperature probes during atrial fibrillation ablation: thermodynamic characteristics. Europace. 2015;17:891–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu356.

  19. Sarairah SY, Woodbury B, Methachittiphan N, Tregoning DM, Sridhar AR, Akoum N. Esophageal thermal injury following cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(3):262–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Halbfass P, Pavlov B, Muller P, Nentwich K, Sonne K, Barth S, et al. Progression from esophageal thermal asymptomatic lesion to perforation complicating atrial fibrillation ablation: a single-center registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(8):10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005233. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005233.

  21. Barbhaiya CR, Kumar S, Guo Y, Zhong J, John RM, Tedrow UB, et al. Global survey of esophageal injury in atrial fibrillation ablation: characteristics and outcomes of esophageal perforation and fistula. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(2):143–50.

  22. Rillig A, Meyerfeldt U, Birkemeyer R, Wiest S, Sauer BM, Staritz M, et al. Oesophageal temperature monitoring and incidence of oesophageal lesions after pulmonary vein isolation using a remote robotic navigation system. Europace. 2010;12(5):655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamasaki H, Tada H, Sekiguchi Y, Igarashi M, Arimoto T, Machino T, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of asymptomatic excessive transmural injury after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(6):826–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Biase L, Saenz LC, Burkhardt DJ, Vacca M, Elayi CS, Barrett CD, et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: documented higher risk of luminal esophageal damage with general anesthesia as compared with conscious sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(2):108–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinek M, Hassanein S, Bencsik G, Aichinger J, Schoefl R, Bachl A, et al. Acute development of gastroesophageal reflux after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(10):1457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, 400 NE Mother Jospeh PI, WA, 98664, Vancouver, USA

    Nashwa M. Abdulsalam

  2. Division of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Arun M. Sridhar, Deanna M. Tregoning, Beixin J. He, Mahbod Jafarvand, Avin Mehri, Tanzina Afroze, Yaacoub Chahine, Cynthia W. Ko & Nazem Akoum

Authors
  1. Nashwa M. Abdulsalam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arun M. Sridhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deanna M. Tregoning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Beixin J. He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mahbod Jafarvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Avin Mehri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tanzina Afroze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yaacoub Chahine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Cynthia W. Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nazem Akoum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nashwa M. Abdulsalam.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

NA

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulsalam, N.M., Sridhar, A.M., Tregoning, D.M. et al. Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1827–1835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation