Notes
Newton and Empiricism, 2. The editors thereby argue against scholars like Peter Anstey, who wants to replace the distinction between empiricism and rationalism, by the distinction between experimental and speculative philosophy. Cf. Newton and Empiricism, 3. This has been criticized by Walsh, a pupil of Anstey. Cf.: https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/emxphi/2014/10/newton-the-empiricist/ for one of the Editors replies see http://digressionsnimpressions.typepad.com/digressionsimpressions/2014/10/on-fetishizing-actors-categories.html.
Newton and Empiricism, 5.
Newton and Empiricism, 211.
Newton and Empiricism, 266.
Newton and Empiricism, 6.
This interpretation is given by B.I. Cohen, to whom the editors refer.
Westfall, Richard S. (1971). Force in Newton’s Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the 17th
Century. London.
Newton and Empiricism, 68.
Newton and Empiricism, 6.
See Newton and Empiricism, 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Görg, E. Zvi Biener and Eric Schliesser (eds): Newton and Empiricism. J Gen Philos Sci 48, 151–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-016-9346-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-016-9346-8