Abstract
This paper uncovers a systematic correlation between semantics of aspect and syntactic argument structure as manifested in the difference between two imperfective aspect markers -ko iss and -a iss in Korean. Unlike the common assumption that the -ko iss form is a progressive marker, while the -a iss form is a resultative marker, this paper argues that the difference between the two derives from their different argument structure: -ko iss selects transitive and unergative verbs, which have an external argument, while -a iss selects unaccusative and passive verbs, which only have an internal theme argument. It is argued that the difference in argument structure is determined by semantic event structure depending on agentivity in Korean. The results of the paper have broader implications for the issues of syntax and semantics interface and unaccusativity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, Yoonja. 1995. The aspectual and temporal system of Korean: From the perspective of the two component theory of aspect. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Bach Emmon (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–15
Burzio Luigi (1986). Italian syntax: A government and binding approach. Dordrecht, Reidel
Choe, Hyun Bae. 1971. Wurimalpon ‘Our Grammar’. Seoul: Cengumsa [first published in 1929].
Chomsky Noam (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The logical decision and action, ed. N. Rescher, 81–95. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dowty David (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht, Reidel
Dowty David (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619
Holisky Dee Ann (1987). The case of the intransitive subject in Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). Lingua 71: 103–132
Hopper Paul, Sandra Thompson (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299
Jackendoff Ray (1976). Toward an explanatory semantic repretation. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 89–150
Jackendoff Ray (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MIT Press
Kang, Young Seo. 1987. Korean syntax and universal grammar. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Kim, Namkil. 1986. The progressive in Korean. In Studies in korean language and linguistics, ed. N. Kim, 98)117. East Asian Studies Center, USC.
Kim, Young Joo. 1990. The syntax and semantics of Korean case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic level of representation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Kim Yookyung (1993). The resultative progressive in Korean. CLS 29, 251–252. Chicago, University of Chicago
Kindaichi Haruhiko (1950). Kokugo doosi no itibunrui [A classification of Japanese verbs]. Gengo Kenkyu 15: 48–63
Kinsui, Satoshi. 1995. Iwayuru ‘sinkoo-tai’ ni tuite [On the so-called progressive]. In Tukisima Hirosi hakase koki kinen kokugogaku ronsyuu, ed. Tukisima Hiroshi, 169–197. Tokyo: Kyuko Shobin.
Kudo, Mayumi. 1995. Asupekuto/tensu taikee to tekusuto: Gendai nihongo no zikan no hyoogen [Aspect-tense system and text: Temporal expressions in Modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Hitsuji.
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1991. Tense, aspect and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffixes in Korean from a typological perspective. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Lee Keedong (1993). A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul, Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1999. Dynamicity as an archi-concept in Korean. Studies in Language (to appear).
Lee EunHee (2004). Different states described by aspectual markers -ko iss and -a/e iss in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 10: 547–557
Lee EunHee (2006). Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 695–717
Levin Beth, Malka Rappaport (1992). The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. Roca 1992: 247–269
Levin Beth, Malka Rappaport (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MIT Press
Martin Samuel (1992). A reference grammar of Korean. Tokyo, Charles E. tuttle Company
Ogihara Toshiyuki (1998). The ambiguity of the -te iru form in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 87–120
Parsons Terence (1989). The progressive in English: Events, states and processes. Lingustics and Philosophy 12: 213–291
Perlmutter David (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–189
Perlmutter, David, and Paul. Postal 1984. The I-advancement exclusiveness law. In Studies in relational grammar 2, ed. D. Perlmutter and C. Rosen, 81–125. University of Chicago Press.
Ritter, Elizabeth. and Sara. Rosen 2000. Event structure and ergativity. In Events as grammatical objects, ed. C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky, 187–238. Stanford: CSLI.
Rosen, Carol. 1984. The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations. In Studies in relational grammar 2, ed. D. Perlmutter and C. Rosen, 38–80. University of Chicago Press.
Ross, John. 1972. Act. In Semantics of natural language, ed. D. Davidson and G. Harmon, 70–126. Dordrecht: Riedel.
Shirai Yasuhiro (1998). Where the progressive and the resultative meet: A typology of imperfective morphology in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and English. Studies in Language 22: 661–692
Shirai Yasuhiro (2000). The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 327–361
Smith, Carlota. 1970. Jespersen’s ‘move and change’ class and causative verbs in English. In Linguistic and literary studies in honor of Archibald A. Hill, vol. 2: Descriptive Linguistics, ed. M. Jazayery, E. Polome, and W. Winter, 101–109. Berlin: Mouton.
Smith Carlota (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Sohn Ho Min (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge, The University of Cambridge Press
Van Valin Robert (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66: 221–260
Van Valin, Robert. 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Advanced in role and reference grammar, ed. R. Van Valin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Valin, Robert. and Wilkins. David 1996. The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited. In Grammatical constructions, ed. M. Shibatani and S. Thomson, 289–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, E. Argument structure and event structure: the case of Korean imperfective constructions. J East Asian Linguist 17, 117–139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9022-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9022-z