Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Treatment of Childhood Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Ambulatory Mental Health Centers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the years, evidence-based treatments for children with disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs; e.g., conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder) have been developed, however, there is not much information about the treatment children receive in usual mental healthcare settings. This study examined the common treatment provided in US ambulatory mental health clinics to children aged 3 to 9 years who are diagnosed with DBDs. An online survey was filled by appropriate respondents from 145 ambulatory mental health centers across 33 states within the US. The most common treatment provided for childhood DBDs was a combination of child therapy (CT) and parent training (PT) (n = 81, 56%), followed by family therapy (n = 42, 29%), CT (n = 17, 12%), and PT (n = 5, 3%). Behavioral and cognitive principles were reported as the most common treatment orientations across all types of treatment (n = 116/145, 80%). The mean number of sessions administered was 31.38 ± 22.72, and PT as a standalone treatment required approximately a third of sessions (10.6 ± 1.34). In treatments combining CT and PT, the utilization of specific parenting programs was associated with fewer administered sessions. Results suggest that the importance of parental involvement in treating DBDs is acknowledged in routine practice. However, more studies are needed to determine why certain types and orientations of treatments are favored over others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In J. H. van Bemmel & A. T. McCray (Eds.), Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: Patient-centered systems (pp. 2000–2070). Stuttgart: Schattauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumel, A., Pawar, A., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U. (2016). Digital parent training for children with disruptive behaviors: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 26(8), 740–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, P. (2008). Probability and measure. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. S., Chow, C., Chan, P. T., Cooper-Vince, C., & Wilson, L. A. (2013). Psychosocial treatment efficacy for disruptive behavior problems in very young children: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(1), 26–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 215–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, A. F., Bickman, L., & Chorpita, B. F. (2010). Change what? Identifying quality improvement targets by investigating usual mental health care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(1-2), 15–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, A. F., Brookman-Frazee, L., Hurlburt, M. S., Accurso, E. C., Zoffness, R. J., Haine-Schlagel, R., & Ganger, W. (2010). Mental health care for children with disruptive behavior problems: A view inside therapists’ offices. Psychiatric Services, 61(8), 788–795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W. (2014). Parenting: A dynamic perspective. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Ayers, W. A., & Rodgers, A. (1990). Empirical and clinical focus of child and adolescent psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 729–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, B., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2006). A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 86–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. J., & Forehand, R. L. (2005). Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merikangas, K. R., & He, J. (2014). Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. In J.-P. Raynaud, M. Hodes & S. S.-F. Gau (Eds.), From Research to Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Lenham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2003). From knowing to doing: A framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda. Evaluation, 9(2), 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onken, L. S., Carroll, K. M., Shoham, V., Cuthbert, B. N., & Riddle, M. (2014). Reenvisioning clinical science: Unifying the discipline to improve the public health. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(1), 22–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rounsaville, B. J., Carroll, K. M., & Onken, L. S. (2001). A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from stage I. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(2), 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, A. (2009). The five most costly conditions, 1996 and 2006: Estimates for the US civilian noninstitutionalized population. Statistical Brief 248. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weersing, V. R., Weisz, J. R., & Donenberg, G. R. (2002). Development of the therapy procedures checklist: A therapist-report measure of technique use in child and adolescent treatment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31(2), 168–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Baumel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

In this exempt study, consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study by having them agreeing to participate after receiving appropriate information about the study and individual rights.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumel, A. The Treatment of Childhood Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Ambulatory Mental Health Centers. J Child Fam Stud 27, 1110–1114 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0957-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0957-4

Keywords

Navigation