Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oocyte cryopreservation in two women with borderline ovarian tumor recurrence.

  • Fertility Preservation
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) commonly occur during reproductive years. Given the good prognosis, fertility-sparing surgery can be considered in young women wishing to preserve their fertility. However, conservative management exposes patients to the risk of recurrence. In these cases, the new surgery may be radical (completing the removal of both adnexa) or, when conservative, it may be associated with relevant damage to the ovarian reserve. In this study, we report on two women who decided to perform ovarian hyper-stimulation and oocyte cryostorage at the time of the diagnosis of recurrence, but before undergoing the new surgery. They both obtained a satisfactory number of oocytes, the retrieval was unremarkable, and no main detrimental effects on the ovarian lesions were noticed. These two cases suggest that ovarian hyper-stimulation and oocyte retrieval before planned surgery for BOT recurrence is a feasible option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Harter P, Gershenson D, Lhomme C, Lecuru F, Ledermann J, Provencher DM, et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (borderline ovarian tumors). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. du Bois A, Ewald-Riegler N, de Gregorio N, Reuss A, Mahner S, Fotopoulou C, et al. Borderline tumours of the ovary: A cohort study of the Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1905–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mangili G, Somigliana E, Giorgione V, Martinelli F, Filippi F, Petrella MC, et al. Fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian tumours. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;49:13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tinelli R, Tinelli A, Tinelli FG, Cicinelli E, Malvasi A. Conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors: a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daraï E, Fauvet R, Uzan C, Gouy S, Duvillard P, Morice P. Fertility and borderline ovarian tumor: a systematic review of conservative management, risk of recurrence and alternative options. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:151–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franchi D, Boveri S, Fruscio R, Fischerova D, Guerriero S, Moruzzi MC, et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (8): ultrasound characteristics of recurrent borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Filippi F, Martinelli F, Paffoni A, Reschini M, Raspagliesi F, Somigliana E. Fertility preservation in women with malignancies: the accuracy of antral follicle count collected randomly during the menstrual cycle in predicting the number of oocytes retrieved. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:569–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman RH, Racowsky C, Farland LV, Munné S, Ribustello L, Fox JH. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:853–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Franchi D, Boveri S, Radice D, Portuesi R, Zanagnolo V, Colombo N, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis and longitudinal follow-up of recurrences after conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(756):e1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ortega I, García-Velasco JA, Pellicer A. Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(10):1751–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ESHRE Working group on ultrasound in ART, D′Angelo A, Panayotidis C, Amso N, Marci R, Matorras R, et al. Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: oocyte pick up. Hum Reprod Open. 2019;4:hoz025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Rafael Z. The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;37(4):443–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohamed AA, Al-Hussaini TK, Fathalla MM, El Shamy TT, Abdelaal II, Amer SA. The impact of excision of benign nonendometriotic ovarian cysts on ovarian reserve: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:169–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgardo Somigliana.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filippi, F., Martinelli, F., Somigliana, E. et al. Oocyte cryopreservation in two women with borderline ovarian tumor recurrence.. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 1213–1216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01733-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01733-6

Keywords

Navigation