Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

EU DAISIE Research Project: Wanted—Death Penalty to Keep Native Species Competitive?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neobiota as non-native species are commonly considered as alien species. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) intends to “prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species”. The European Union has financed the DAISIE research project for the first pan-European inventory of Invasive Alien Species (IAS), which is supposed to serve as a basis for prevention and control of biological invasions. This paper discusses the evaluation approach for classifying “100 of the Worst” IAS in Europe by the EU DAISIE research project. The main impact categories used by DAISIE for assorting “100 of the Worst” IAS are investigated and the texts of the “Wanted” species factsheets are examined. Two examples from the DAISIE factsheets of the “100 of the Worst” IAS [Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and the Raccoon (Procyon lotor)] are discussed to illustrate DAISIE’s biodiversity evaluation approach in more detail. However, the classification criteria used by DAISIE do not allow for sufficiently differentiating these neobiota from an ecological behavior of native species with a similar ecological niche. In conclusion, neobiota evaluations are not comprehensive when they refer mainly to the successful expansion and competition with native species into available ecological niches. A comprehensive assessment of the impacts of neobiota on biodiversity and humans needs to take into account the different values of biodiversity as mentioned in the preamble of the CBD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boye, P. (2003). Neozoen. In I. Kowarik (Ed.), Biologische invasionen—Neophyten und neozoen in mitteleuropa (pp. 264–282). Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H., & Sax, D. F. (2004). An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Austral Ecology, 29(5), 530–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H., & Sax, D. F. (2005). Biological invasions and scientific objectivity: Reply to Cassey et al. (2005). Austral Ecology, 30(4), 481–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD. (1992). Convention on biological diversity. Montreal: Intersecretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/.

  • CBD. (2005). Handbook of the convention on biological diversity including its cartagena protocol on biosafety 3rd edition. Montreal: Intersecretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.cbd.int/doc/handbook/cbd-hb-all-en.pdf.

  • Chytrý, M., Jarošík, V., Pyšek, P., Hájek, O., Knollová, I., Tichý, L., et al. (2008). Separating habitat invisibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasions. Ecology, 89(6), 1541–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clout, M. N., & De Poorter, M. (2005). International initiatives against invasive alien species. Weed Technology, 19(3), 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti, R. I., & Richardson, D. M. (2009). Subjectivity and flexibility in invasion terminology too much of a good thing? Biological Invasions, 11(6), 1225–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W. (2004). Alien species and evolution. The evolutionary ecology of exotic plants, animals, microbes, and interacting native species. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAISIE (Ed.). (2008). 100 of the worst. Swindon: Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe (DAISIE). Retrieved December 1, 2008 from http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesTheWorst.do.

  • Didham, R. K., Tylianakis, J. M., Hutchison, M. A., Ewers, R. M., & Gemmell, N. J. (2005). Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 470–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2006). Communication from the commission. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 and beyond. Sustaining ecosystem services for human-well being. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/index_en.htm.

  • EC. (2008). Communication from the commission to the council, the European parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Towards an EU strategy on invasive species. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/docs/1_EN_ACT_part1_v6.pdf.

  • EC. (2010). Commission staff working document. Consolidated profile. Accompanying document to the report from the commission to the council and the European parliament. The 2010 assessment of implementing the EU biodiversity action plan. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/bap_2010/CONSOLIDATED%20PROFILE.pdf.

  • EC. (2011). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/2020/1_EN_ACT_part1_v7%5B1%5D.pdf.

  • EU. (2009). A mid-term assessment of implementing the EU biodiversity action plan and towards an EU strategy on invasive alien species—Council conclusions. Brussels: Council of the European Union. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/index_en.htm.

  • EU. (2010). EU council conclusions on biodiversity post-2010. Brussels: Council of the European Union. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/fr/article_9571_fr.htm.

  • EU. (2011). EU biodiversity strategy to 2020—Council conclusions. Brussels: Council of the European Union. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/envir/122950.pdf.

  • Falk-Petersen, J., Bøhn, T., & Sandlund, O. T. (2006). On the numerous concepts in invasion biology. Biological Invasions, 8(6), 1409–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. E. (1987). Spatial structure and population vulnerability. In M. E. Soulé (Ed.), Viable populations for conservation (pp. 125–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hejda, M., Pyšek, P., Pergl, J., Sádlo, J., Chytrý, M., & Jarošík, V. (2009). Invasion success of alien plants: Do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18(3), 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, P. E. (2007). Biological invasions in Europe: Drivers, pressures, states, impacts and responses. In R. Hester & R. M. Harrison (Eds.), Biodiversity under threat. Issues in environmental science and technology (Vol. 25, pp. 56–80). Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, P. E., Pyšek, P., Nentwig, W., & Vilà, M. (2009a). Will threat of biological invasions unite the European union? Science, 324(5923), 40–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, P. E., Roy, D. B., Cunha, T., & Larsson, T.-B. (2009b). A pan-European inventory of alien species: Rationale, implementation and implications for managing biological invasions. In DAISIE (Ed.), DAISIE Handbook of alien species in Europe invading nature–Springer series in invasion ecology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausnitzer, B. (1993). Ökologie der Großstadtfauna (2nd ed.). Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbauer, I., Dullinger, S., Peterseil, J., & Essl, F. (2010). Climate change might drive the invasive tree Robinia pseudacacia into nature reserves and endangered habitats. Biological Conservation, 143(2), 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingenstein, F., Eberhardt, D., & Kornacker, P. M. (2003). Invasive gebietsfremde Arten aus Sicht des Naturschutzes auf Bundesebene. In M. Welling (Ed.), Bedrohung der biologischen Vielfalt durch invasive gebietsfremde Arten. Erfassung, Monitoring und Risikoanalyse (pp. 24–39). Bonn: Angewandte Wissenschaft, Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMVEL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. (2003). Biologische Invasionen—Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. Mit einem Beitrag von Peter Boye. Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I., Heink, U., Schmitz, G., & Starfinger, U. (2003a). Entwicklung von Bewertungskriterien für die Freisetzung gebietsfremder Pflanzen. Wirkung auf Pflanzengemeinschaften und ausgewählte Tiere. Ökologische Bewertung gebietsfremder Pflanzen UFOPLAN 299 812 02 Textband. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I., Heink, U., & Starfinger, U. (2003b). Bewertung gebietsfremder Pflanzenarten. Kernpunkte eines Verfahrens zur Risikobewertung bei sekundären Ausbringungen. In M. Welling (Ed.), Bedrohung der biologischen Vielfalt durch invasive gebietsfremde Arten. Erfassung, Monitoring und Risikoanalyse (pp. 131–144). Bonn: Angewandte Wissenschaft, Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMVEL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I., & Säumel, I. (2007). Biological flora of Central Europe: Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle’. Perspectives in Plant Ecology. Evolution and Systematics, 8(4), 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B. M. H. (2005). The war of the roses: Demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(9), 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne, S., Mouquet, N., Thuiller, W., & Ronce, O. (2010). Biodiversity and climate change: Integrating evolutionary and ecological responses of species and communities. Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., & De Poorter, M. (2004). 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. A selection from the global invasive species database. Auckland: University of Auckland. Retrieved March 12, 2011 from http://www.gisp.org/publications/reports/100worst.pdf.

  • Pejchar, L., & Mooney, H. (2010). The impact of invasive alien species on ecosystem services and human well-being. In C. Perrings, H. Mooney, & M. Williamson (Eds.), Bioinvasions & globalization. Ecology, economics, management, and policy (pp. 161–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prévot-Juillard, A.-C., Clavel, J., Teillac-Deschamps, P., & Juillard, R. (2011). The need for flexibility in conservation practices: Exotic species as an example. Environmental Management, 57, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Pergl, J., Randall, R., Chytrý, M., Kühn, I., et al. (2009). The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Diversity and Distributions, 15(5), 891–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010). Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, A., & Cohen, J. (2007). The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact. Biological Invasions, 9(3), 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. (2005). Do non-native species threaten the natural environment? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18(3), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. (2009). Environmental harm: Political not biological. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(1), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalera, R. (2010). How much is Europe spending on invasive alien species? Biological Invasions, 12(1), 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, E., Simpson, A., & Curd-Hetrick, S. (2010). Draft list of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) online information systems. Baltimore: Global Invasive Species Information Network (GISN). Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.gisinetwork.org/Documents/draftiasdbs.pdf.

  • Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M., & Pace, M. L. (2006). Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(11), 645–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. D., & Ohlemüller, R. (2010). Climate change and species’ distributions: An alien future? In C. Perrings, H. Mooney, & M. Williamson (Eds.), Bioinvasions & globalization. Ecology, economics, management, and policy (pp. 19–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valéry, L., Fritz, H., Lefeuvre, J.-C., & Simberloff, D. (2008). In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself. Biological Invasions, 10(8), 1345–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà, M., Başnou, C., Gollasch, S., Josefsson, M., Pergl, J., & Scalerra, R. (2009a). One hundred of the most Invasive Alien Species in Europe. In D. A. I. S. IE (Ed.), DAISIE handbook of alien species in Europe invading nature–Springer series in invasion ecology (Vol. 3, pp. 265–268). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilà, M., Başnou, C., Pyšek, P., Josefsson, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., et al. (2009b). How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(3), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, G.-R., Roques, A., Hulme, P. E., Sykes, M. T., Pyšek, P., Kühn, I., et al. (2009). Alien species in a warmer world: Risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(12), 686–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. R. (2007). Perspectives on the ‘alien’ versus ‘native’ species debate: A critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4), 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. R. (2009). Using the native/alien classification for description not prescription: A response to Christopher Preston. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 711–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zisenis, M. (2009). To which extent is the interdisciplinary evaluation approach of the CBD reflected in European and international biodiversity-related regulations? Biodiversity and Conservation, 18(3), 639–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Staci McLennan and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eisenacher Straße 54, 10823, Berlin, Germany

    M. Zisenis

Authors
  1. M. Zisenis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Zisenis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zisenis, M. EU DAISIE Research Project: Wanted—Death Penalty to Keep Native Species Competitive?. J Agric Environ Ethics 25, 597–606 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9323-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9323-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation