Abstract
Natura 2000 is a network of natural sites whose aim is to preserve species and habitats of relevance in the European Union. The policy underlying Natura 2000 has faced widespread opposition from land users and received extensive support from environmentalists. This paper addresses the ethical framework for Natura 2000 and the probable moral assumptions of its main stakeholders. Arguments for and against Natura 2000 were analyzed and classified according to “strong” or “weak” versions of the three main theories of environmental ethics – anthropocentrism, biocentrism, and ecocentrism. Weak (intergenerational) anthropocentrism was found to underlie the Natura 2000 network itself and the positions of environmentalists, while strong (traditional) anthropocentrism pervaded the positions of economic developers. Land users seemed to fall somewhere between weak and strong anthropocentrism. The paper discusses the relation between ethics and different attitudes towards Natura 2000, highlighting some of the implications for the network’s ongoing implementation. It is shown that Natura 2000 achieves a strong reversal of the burden of proof from conservation to economic development and land use change under anthropocentrism. It is argued that the alleged theoretical divide between anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism in relation to the burden of proof does not seem to hold in practice. Finally, it is predicted that the weak versions of anthropocentrism, biocentrism, and ecocentrism, are likely to converge extensively in respect to nature conservation policy measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Alphandèry A. Fortier (2001) ArticleTitleCan a Territorial Policy be Based on Science Alone? The System for Creating the Natura 2000 Network in France Sociologia Ruralis 41 311–328
Buckwell A. (2001). The Blues and the Greens: Complementarities and Conflicts between Landowners and Environmentalists, draft scooping paper for the European Landowners Organization (ELO) bureau, 5 p., retrieved July 29, 2003, from ELO’s webpage at http://www.elo.org/documents/ELO84254.pdf
P.J. Cafaro R.B. Primack (2001) Ethical Issues in Biodiversity protection S.A. Levin. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol.2 Academic Press New York 593–607
J.B. Callicott (1995) Environmental Ethics 1.Overview W.T. Reich (Eds) Encyclopedia of Bioethics Simon and Schuster MacMillan, New York 676–687
A. Dobson (2000) Green Political Thought 3rd ed. Routledge London and New York
Ecologistas en Acciòn, La Red Natura 2000 en España, Manifiesto de Sectores Interesados e Involucrados para una adecuada Implantaciòn y Financiaciòn, (2002), 3 p., retrieved July 29, 2003, from the website of Ecologistas en Acciòn at http://www.nodo50.org/ecologistas/accion/espacios/manifiesto_red_natura.rtf
European Commission, Managing Natura 2000 Sites: the Provisions of Article 6 of the ‘Habitats’ Directive 92/43/CEE, (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2000), 69 p., retrieved July 29, 2003, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/art6_en.pdf
European Commission, Final Report on Financing Natura 2000, Working Group on Article 8 of the Habitats Directive, (2002), 36 p., retrieved July 29, 2003, from the European Commission’s nature conservation homepage at http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/final_report_en.pdf
European Council, Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the Conservation of Wild Birds, Official Journal of the European Communities L 103, 25.04.1979, retrieved November 7, 2002 from http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/pdf/1979/en_1979L0409 _do_001pdf
European Council, Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora, Official Journal of the European Communities L 206, 22.07.1992, retrieved November 7, 2002 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/habdir.htm.
FNSEA, Dèclaration commune, Le “dègel” de Natura 2000: les conditions sont remplies pour que la concertation s’engage sur de nouvelles bases, (1997), retrieved January 30, 2003 from the website of FNSEA, Fèdèration Nationale des Syndicats d’èxploitants Agricole, at http://www.fnsea.fr/actu_suite.asp?IdArticle=178
W. Fox (1993) ArticleTitleWhat Does the Recognition of Intrinsic Value Entail Trumpeter 10 IssueID3 101
A. Gonzàlez M. Amèrigo (1999) ArticleTitleActitudes hacia el medio ambiente y conducta ecològica Psicothema 11 IssueID1 13–25
ICN, Rede Natura 2000, Implementação em Portugal – Nota Informativa, 2ª Fase da Lista Nacional de Sítios ao Abrigo da Directiva 92/43 CEE, report on the public consultation process of Natura 2000, Instituto de Conservação da Natureza (Lisboa, 2000).
A. Leopold (1991) A Sand County Almanac, with Essays on Conservation from Round River Ballantines Books [1949] New York
B.G. Norton (1987) Why Preserve Natural Variety? Princeton University Press Princeton
B.G. Norton (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists Oxford University Press Oxford
B.G. Norton (2003) Convergence Corroborated, a Comment on Arne Naess on Wolf Policies in Searching for Sustainability, Interdisciplinary Essays in the Philosophy of Conservation Biology Cambridge University Press Cambridge 78–87
J.L. Paterson (2003) ArticleTitleConceptualizing Stewardship in Agriculture Within the Christian Tradition Environmental Ethics 25 43–58
E. Pouta M. Rekola J. Kuuluvainen O. Tahvonen C.-Z. Li (2000) ArticleTitleContingent Valuation of the Natura 2000 Nature Conservation Programme in Finland Forestry 73 IssueID2 119–128
R.B. Primack (1995) A Primer of Conservation Biology Sinauer Associates Sunderland MA
M. Rekola E. Pouta J. Kuuluvainen O. Tahvonen C.-Z. Li (2000) ArticleTitleIncommensurable Preferences in Contingent Valuation The Case of Natura 2000 Network in Finland Environmental Conservation. 27 IssueID3 260–268
H. Rolston SuffixIII (1989) Philosophy Gone Wild, Environmental Ethics Prometheus Books Buffalo New York
D. Salazar D.K. Alper (2002) ArticleTitleReconciling Environmentalism and the Left Perspectives on Democracy and Social Justice in British Columbia’s Environmental Movement Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 IssueID3 527–566
M. Stenmark (2002) ArticleTitleThe relevance of Environmental Ethical Theories for Policy Making Environmental Ethics 24 135–148
P. Taylor (1986) Respect for Nature A Theory of Environmental Ethics Princeton university Press Princeton
P.B. Thompson (2002) Land G.L. Comstock (Eds) Life science Ethics Iowa State Press, Blackwell Publ.Co., Ames, Iowa 169–190
G.E. Varner (1998) In Nature’s Interests? Interests Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics Oxford University Press New York Oxford
Wallström M., Statement as EU’s Commissioner for the Environment at the 10th anniversary of the Habitats Directive (2002), retrieved January 29, 2003 from http://www.natura2000benefits.org/uk/index.htm.
N. Weber T. Christophersen (2002) ArticleTitleThe Influence of Non-Governmental Organisations on the Creation of Natura 2000 During the European Policy Process Forest Policy and Economics 4 1–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
“Charting the depths of law and policy disputes yield an understanding of ethical differences.” Paul B. Thompson (2002, p. 189).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosa, H.D., Da Silva, J.M. From Environmental Ethics to Nature Conservation Policy: Natura 2000 and the Burden of Proof. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 107–130 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0634-2
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0634-2