Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Predictors of Business Student Cheating Behaviour in Chinese Societies

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cheating is a serious issue among business students worldwide. However, research investigating the social factors that may help prevent cheating in Chinese higher education is rare. The present study examined two key social relationship factors of perceived teacher-student relationships and peer relationships by the students. It attempted to build a model which addressed the effects of two variables on Chinese business students’ cheating behaviour: the teacher’s approachability and the relationship goal of the students. Two important social influence factors were also tested as mediators: neutralizing attitudes and perceived cheating norms of the students. A student survey was conducted with 1329 questionnaires collected. The results showed the negative effects of both social relationship variables on cheating, and that their effects were fully mediated by neutralizing attitudes. Moreover, perceived cheating norms fully mediated the effect of the teacher’s approachability, but not so for the relationship goal of the students. This study provided novel insights and recommendations for promoting academic integrity in Chinese business schools and universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (Eds.). (2007). Psychology of academic cheating. London: Elsevier.

  • Anderman, E. M., Freeman, T. M., & Mueller, E. E. (2007). The “social” side of social context: Interpersonal and affiliative dimensions of students’ experiences and academic dishonesty. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 203–228). London: Elsevier.

  • Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17(4), 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, E. M. (2014). Students reported for cheating explain what they think would have stopped them. Ethics and Behaviour, 24(3), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, R. L., & Cochran, J. T. (1990). The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. Y. K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Szeto, R. W. F. (2002). The dynamics of guanxi and ethics for Chinese executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K. J., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.F. (2003). The social impact of China’s one-child policy. Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 7(1), 74–76. http://web.mit.edu/lipoff/www/hapr/summer03_security/CHEN.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2016.

  • Chen, X. Y., Rubin, K. H., & Li, D. (1997). Relation between academic achievement and social adjustment: evidence from Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. Y., Cen, G. Z., Li, D., & He, Y. F. (2005). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: the imprint of historical time. Child Development, 76(1), 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cokley, K., Komarraju, M., Patel, N., Castillon, J., Rosales, R., Pickett, R., Ravitch, J., & Pang, L. (2004). Construction and initial validation of the student-professor interaction scale (SPIS). College Student Affairs Journal, 24(1), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cokley, K., Komarraju, M., Rosales, R., Shen, F., Picket, R., & Patel, N. (2007). Assessment of quality of student-faculty interactions: a new scale of assessing the quality of student-faculty interactions. Journal of the Professoriate, 1(2), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, A. (2011). Turning a blind eye: faculty who ignore student cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37, 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etter, S., Cramer, J. J., & Finn, S. (2006). Origins of academic dishonesty: ethical orientations and personality factors associated with attitudes about cheating with information technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, K., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, T. B., & Drinan, P. (2006). Organizational theory and student cheating: explanation, responses, and strategies. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 839–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffan, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviours. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, L. (1997). How do academic motivation and peer relationship mix in an adolescent’s world? Middle School Journal, 28, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nation. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. K. (1996). Cheating: limits of individual integrity. Journal of Moral Education, 25, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behaviour, 11(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitely, B. E., Jr., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics and Behaviour, 8, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attributional theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Komarraju, M., Musulkin, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2010). Role of student-faculty interactions in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons: Learning from academic dishonesty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P. (2013). Perceptions of the teacher-student relationship: a study of upper elementary teachers and their students. International Education, 42(2), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, G. (1996). Chinese traditional social and moral ideas and rules. Beijing: The University of Chinese People Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. C., McCabe, D. L., & Liu, R. Z. (2013). Students academic cheating in Chinese universities: prevalence, influencing factors, and proposed actions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62(3), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (1999). Academic dishonesty among high school students. Adolescence, 34, 681–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1995). Cheating among business students: a challenge for business leaders and educators. Journal of Management Education, 19, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics and Behaviour, 11, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: a replication and extension of modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Butterfield, K., & Trevino, L. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes, and proposed action. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Goetzinger, A. (2007). Effects of classroom context on college students’ attitudes towards academic dishonesty: mediating and moderating influence. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, R. C. (1982). Alienation and cheating behaviour in the school environment. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 234–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, H. W. W., Davies, G., Bates, I., & Avellone, M. (2003). Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students: investigating academic dishonesty behaviours in undergraduates. Pharmacy Education, 3, 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngok, K. L. (2007). Chinese education policy in the context of decentralization and marketization: evolution and implications. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., Hicks, L., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social efficacy and social goal pursuit to self-efficacy for academic work. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40, 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabi, S. M., Patton, L. R., Fjortoft, N., & Zgarrick, D. P. (2006). Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(4), 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (2005). The relations among religion, motivation and college cheating: a natural experiment. Ethics and Behaviour, 15(2), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., Amburgey, R., Swank, E., & Faulkner, C. (2004). Test cheating in a rural college: studying the importance of individual and situational factors. College Student Journal, 38, 380–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semerci, C. (2006). The opinions of medicine faculty students regarding cheating in relation to Kohlberg’s moral development concept. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, L. S., & Davis, J. R. (2004). Perceptions of dishonesty among two-year college students: academic versus business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. A. (2001). The student–instructor relationship’s effects on academic integrity. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaiden, Z., Awamieh, R., & Swaiden, R. (2009). Academic dishonesty across cultures review and research agenda. Review of Business Research, 9(1), 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: the role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: the role of parents, teachers and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z. (2006). What it means to develop a new teacher-student relationship. Academic Research, 11, 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Room 833, Cheng Yu Tung Building, 12 Chak Cheung Street, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong

    Anna P. Y. Tsui & H. Y. Ngo

Authors
  1. Anna P. Y. Tsui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Y. Ngo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna P. Y. Tsui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsui, A.P.Y., Ngo, H.Y. Social Predictors of Business Student Cheating Behaviour in Chinese Societies. J Acad Ethics 14, 281–296 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9266-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9266-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation