Skip to main content
Log in

Borrowing constraints, the cost of precautionary saving and unemployment insurance

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When it is costly for individuals to save or to borrow, unemployment insurance (UI) provides an alternative source of liquidity that smooths consumption over time and leads individuals to spend longer unemployed searching for a suitable job. We show in a tractable life-cycle model how the optimal unemployment replacement ratio and the fall in consumption on job loss depend on the cost of self-insurance and the cost of borrowing. This implies that the value of UI depends on age at job loss, consumption needs (such as the presence of children), discount rates, the return on saving, access to credit and the presence of other social insurance programmes. Optimal replacement rates vary substantially with plausible variation in these factors (from less than 20 percent to almost 60 percent).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alan, S., & Browning, M. (2010). Estimating intertemporal allocation parameters using synthetic residual estimation. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1231–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., Banks, J., Meghir, C., & Weber, G. (1999). Humps and bumps in consumption. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(1), 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., & Brugiavini, A. (2003). Social security and household savings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1075–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., & Rohwedder, S. (2004). Pension wealth and household saving: Evidence from pension reforms in the U.K. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1499–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. (1978). Some aspects of optimal unemployment insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 10(3), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemen, H. G., & Stancanelli, E. G. F. (2005). Financial wealth, consumption smoothing, and income shocks arising from job loss. Economica, 72, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, M., & Crossley, T. F. (2001). Unemployment benefit levels and consumption changes. Journal of Public Economics, 80(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. (1997). Buffer stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R. (2006). A general formula for the optimal level of social insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1879–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R. (2008). Moral hazard vs. liquidity and optimal unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 116(2), 173–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costain, J. (1999). Unemployment insurance with endogenous search intensity and precautionary savings. Draft, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

  • Crossley, T., & Low, H. (2011). Job loss, credit constrains and consumption growth (Mimeo). University of Cambridge.

  • Deaton, A. (1991). Savings and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, 59, 1221–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1979). A model of social insurance with variable retirement. Journal of Public Economics, 10, 295–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2002). The importance of bequests and life-cycle saving in capital accumulation: A new answer. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 92(2), 274–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S., & Gruber, J. (1997). Can families smooth variable earnings? Brookings Papers on Economics Activity, 1997(1), 229–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, E. M., & Gruber, J. (2001). Unemployment insurance and precautionary savings. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47(3), 545–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M., & Altman, D. (1998). Unemployment insurance savings accounts (NBER Working Paper 6860).

  • Gruber, J. (1997). The consumption smoothing benefit of unemployment insurance. The American Economic Review, 87(1), 192–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. (2001). The wealth of the unemployed. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 55(1), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. D., & Imrohoroglu, A. (1992). The role of unemployment insurance in an economy with liquidity constraints and moral hazard. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 118–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jappelli, T. (1990). Who is credit constrained in the U.S. economy? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(1), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, R. (2009). Optimal unemployment insurance in an estimated job search model with savings. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (1990). Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrika, 58, 757–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, D. (1986). Job search and labor market analysis. In O. Ashenfeller & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendon, S. (2006). Job search and asset accumulation under borrowing constraints. International Economic Review, 47, 233–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samwick, A. A. (1998). Discount rate heterogeneity and social security reform. Journal of Development Economics, 57, 117–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. X. (2008). Borrowing during unemployment: Unsecured debt as a safety net. The Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 383–412.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamish Low.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crossley, T.F., Low, H. Borrowing constraints, the cost of precautionary saving and unemployment insurance. Int Tax Public Finance 18, 658–687 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9172-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9172-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation