Skip to main content
Log in

The Scandinavian model—prospects and challenges

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scandinavian countries are often portrayed in policy debates as model examples having shown how to square concerns for efficiency and equity. The core principle of the Scandinavian welfare model is an individual entitlement to public sector provisions combined with collective financing via taxes. However, a high employment rate is needed to ensure financial viability of this model. The Scandinavian model faces several challenges which affect the possibilities of maintaining a high employment ratio, namely, demographic changes, a growth dilemma and globalisation. This paper discusses how these challenges affect the need and scope for reforms of the Scandinavian welfare model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accemoglu, D., & Shimer, R. (2000). Efficient unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 893–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adema, W. (2001). Net social expenditures. Working Paper, OECD.

  • Andersen, T. M. (2003). Welfare policies, labour taxation and international integration. International Tax and Public Finance, 10, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. M. (2004). Challenges to the Scandinavian welfare model. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 743–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. M. (2006). Ageing and globalisation in the Scandinavian Welfare Model. Ageing Horizons, 4, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. M., & Pedersen, L. H. (2006). Assessing fiscal sustainability and the consequences of reforms. In European economy. Economic Papers, No. 248, May 2006. Brussels: European Commission (available at http://europa.et.int/economy_finance).

  • Andersen, T. M., & Svarer, M. (2006). Flexicurity—the Danish labour market model. Ekonomisk Debatt.

  • Boeri, T., Brugiavini, A., & Clamfors, L. (Eds.). (2001). The role of trade union in the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.

  • Börsch-Supan, A. (2005). From traditional DB to notional DC systems: the pension reform process in Sweden, Italy and Germany. Journal of the European Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, 3, 458–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L., Forslund, A., & Hemström, M. (2002). Does active labour market policy work? Lessons from the Swedish experience?. Seminar paper 700, Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University.

  • de la Fuente, A. (2003). Human capital in a global and knowledge based economy. European Commission, Economic Papers, Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs.

  • Duval, R. (2004). Retirement behaviour in OECD countries: impact of old-age pensions schemes and other social transfer programmes. OECD Economic Studies, 37.

  • Eaton, J., & Rosen, H. S. (1980). Taxation, human capital and uncertainty. American Economic Review, 70, 705–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosgerau, M., Hougaard Jensen, S. E., & Sørensen, A. (2000). Relative demand shifts for educated labour. CEBR Discussion Paper 200-11.

  • Frederiksen, D., Heide, K. M., Holmøy, E., & Solli, I. F. (2005). Makroøkonomiske virkninger av pensjonsreformer—Beregninger baseret på forslag fra Pensjonskommissionen. Working Paper, Statistics Norway.

  • Graafland, J. J. (2000). Childcare subsidies, labour supply and public finance: an AGE approach. Economic Modelling, 17, 209–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. (2004). Social security systems. Copenhagen: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2004). World economic outlook—the global demographic transition. September 2004, Washington.

  • Larsen, D., & Sørensen, P. B. (2003). Financing the Nordic welfare states. In Det fremtida nordiske välfärdssamhället—Utmaningar och möjligheter. Nordiska Ministerrådet.

  • Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., & Weibüll, J. W. (2003). Social norms and welfare state dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 533–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshal, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class, and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordic Social-Statistical Committee. (2006). Social tryghed i de Nordiske lande 2004. Omfang, udgifter og finansiering. NOSOSKO 28-2006, Copenhagen.

  • OECD. (2004). Education at a glance. Paris.

  • OECD. (2005). Economic surveys. Paris.

  • OECD. (2006). Projecting OECD health and long-term care expenditures: what are the main drivers. Economics Departments, Workings Papers 477.

  • Pedersen, P. J., Røed, M., & Schröder, L. (2003). Emigration from the Scandinavian welfare states. In T. M. Andersen, & P. Molander (Eds.), Alternatives for welfare policy—coping with internationalisation and demographic change. Cambridge University Press.

  • Pedersen, P. J., Pytlikova, M., & Smith, N. (2004). Selection or network effects? Migration flows into 27 OECD countries, 1990–2000. IZA Discussion Paper 1104.

  • Pensjonskommisjonen. (2004). Moderniseret Folketrygd—Bærekraftig Pensjon for Fremtida. NOU, Norges Offentlige Udredninger 2004:1.

  • Rockwool Fondens Forskningsenhed. (2004). Migrants, work, and the welfare state, ed. by T. Tranæs and K.F. Zimmermann. Copenhagen: The Rockwool Foundation Research Unit.

  • Sinn, H. W. (1995). A theory of the welfare state. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 495–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L., Gruber, J., & Vegara, R. (1993). Taxation and the structure of labour markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 385–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, P. B. (2000). The case for international tax co-ordination reconsidered. Economic Policy, 26, 430–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Noord, P. (2001). Automatic stabilizers. OECD Working Paper.

  • Varian, H. (1980). Redistributive taxation as social insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 14, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velfærdskommissionen. (2004). Fremtidens Velfærd kommer ikke af sig selv. Analyserapport, Copenhagen.

  • Velfærdskommissionen. (2005a). Fremtidens Velfærd—Globalisering. Analyserapport, Copenhagen.

  • Velfærdskommissionen. (2005b). Fremtidens Velfærd—Sådan gør andre lande. Analyserapport, Copenhagen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben M. Andersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, T.M. The Scandinavian model—prospects and challenges. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 45–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9022-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9022-3

Keywords

JEL

Navigation