Skip to main content
Log in

Selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of juvenile open angle glaucoma patients under 25 years of age

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) treatment in juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG) cases.

Material and method

The 46 eyes of 28 cases that had undergone SLT for JOAG and had a follow-up of at least one month were included in the study. The pre-SLT, month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, and final follow-up intraocular pressure (IOP); the number of drugs before and after the SLT procedure; and the complications caused by the SLT were recorded. An IOP below 21 mmHg without any additional medication or glaucoma surgery and an IOP decrease of 20% or more compared to the baseline were considered successful.

Results

There were 18 females and 10 males with a mean age of 17.52 ± 2.7 (13–22) years. The cases were followed-up for a mean duration of 39 (5–59) months. The mean IOP was 23.93 ± 0.52 mmHg before SLT and decreased to 17.15 ± 0.57 mmHg at month 1 after the procedure, 17.17 ± 0.52 mmHg at month 6, 18.02 ± 0.77 mmHg at year 1, 18.12 ± 0.48 mmHg at year 2, and 20.93 ± 0.69 mmHg at the final follow-up. The post-SLT IOP measurements at all times were found to be significantly lower than the pre-SLT values (p < 0.001). The mean number of drugs was 1.5 before the SLT and 0.59 afterwards (p < 0.001). The most common complications after SLT were anterior chamber inflammation in 29 cases (63.04%), hyperemia in 20 (43.40%) cases (4.34%), an early period IOP increase of 5 mmHg or more in 11 cases (23.91%), and mild ocular pain in 2 cases (4.34%).

Conclusion

SLT is an effective and reliable method for JOAG treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Glaucoma Society (2008) Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 3rd edn (2.2.1), p 95

  2. Kwun Y, Lee EJ, Han JC, Kee C (2016) Clinical characteristics of Juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol 30(2):127–133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldwyn R, Waltman SR, Becker B (1970) Primary open-angle glaucoma in adolescents and young adults. Arch Ophthalmol 84(5):579–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall LL, Hayslett RL, Stevens GA (2018) Therapy for open-angle glaucoma. Consult Pharm 33(8):432–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chardoub AAJ, Blair K (2022) Juvenile glaucoma. StatPearls Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  6. Talbot AW, Russel-Eggit I (2000) Pharmaceutical management of the childhood glaucomas. Expert Opin Pharmacother 1(4):697–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiggs JL, Del Bono EA, Schuman JS, Hutchinson BT, Walton DS (1995) Clinical features of five pedigrees genetically linked to the juvenile glaucoma locus on chromosome 1q21-q31. Ophthalmology 102(12):1782–1789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson AT, Drack AV, Kwitek AE, Cannon RL, Stone EM, Alward WL (1993) Clinical features and linkage analysis of a family with autosomal dominant juvenile glaucoma. Ophthalmology 100(4):524–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeda H, Ishigooka H, Muto T, Tanihara H, Nagata M (2004) Long-term outcome of trabeculotomy for the treatment of developmental glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122(8):1122–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pathania D, Senthil S, Rao HL, Mandal AK, Garudadari CS (2014) Outcomes of trabeculectomy in juvenile open angle glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 62(2):224–228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai JC, Chang HW, Kao CN, Lai IC, Teng MC (2003) Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C versus trabeculectomy alone for juvenile primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 217(1):24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mark A, Latina MD, Joseph AJ, Tumbocon MD (2002) Selective laser trabeculoplasty: a new treatment option for open angle glaucoma. Curr Opinion Ophthalmol 13:94–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stangos AN, Whatham AR, Sunaric-Megevand G (2005) Primary viscocanalostomy for juvenile open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 140(3):490–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Congdon N, Azuara-Blanco A, Solberg Y et al (2021) Direct selective laser trabeculoplasty in open angle glaucoma study design: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, investigator-masked trial (GLAUrious). Br J ophthalmol 0:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Agarwal HC, Sihota R, Das C, Dada T (2002) Role of argon laser trabeculoplasty as primary and secondary therapy in open angle glaucoma in Indian patients. Br J Ophthalmol 86:733–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ansari E (2021) 10-year outcomes of first-line selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259:1597–1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ticho U, Nesher R (1989) Laser trabeculoplasty in glaucoma: ten-year evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 107:844–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Investigators AGIS (2002) The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS), 11: risk factors for failure of trabeculectomy and argon laser trabeculoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 134:481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group (1995) The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and glaucoma laser trial follow-up study, seven-year results. Am J Ophthalmol 120:718–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Latina M, Park C (1995) Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulse and continuous laser interactions. Exp Eye Res 60:359–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kramer TR, Noecker RJ (2001) Comparison of the morphologic changes after selective laser trabeculoplasty in human eye bank eyes. Ophthalmology 108:773–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kun Hong B, Winer JC, Martone JF et al (2009) Repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma 18(3):180–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eyawo O, Lee C-W, Rachlis B et al (2008) Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials for major prostaglandins: a systematic survey of the ophthalmology literature. Trials 9:69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Latina MA, Sibayan SA, Shin DH et al (1998) Q-switched 532-nm Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clinical study. Ophthalmology 105:2082–2090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Woo DM, Healey PR, Graham SL (2015) Intraocular pressure-lowering medications and long term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty: glaucoma laser and medical therapy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 43:320–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. El Mallah MK, Walsh MM, Stinnett SS et al (2010) Selective laser trabeculoplasty reduces mean IOP and IOP variation in normal tension glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol 4:889–893

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pan YI, Damji KF, Rock W et al (2004) Highly successful SLT is independent of glaucoma risk factors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:4456

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hodge WG, Damji KF, Rock W et al (2005) Baseline IOP predicts selective laser trabeculoplasty success at 1 year post-treatment: results from a randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1157–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 134:221–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP et al (2006) Categorizing the stageof glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spaeth GL (1971) The normal development of the human anterior chamber angle: a new system of descriptive grading. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 91:709–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leahy KE, White AJ (2015) Selective laser trabeculoplasty: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 11:833–841

    Google Scholar 

  33. Song J, Song A, Palmares T, Song M (2013) Selective laser trabeculoplasty success in pediatric patients with glaucoma: two case reports. J Med Case Rep 7:198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lui Y, Birt CM (2012) Argon versus selective laser trabeculoplasty in younger patients: 2-years results. J Glaucoma 21:112–115

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gupta V, Ghosh S, Chaudhary S et al (2018) Selective laser trabeculoplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma patients younger than 40 years. Can J Ophthalmol 53(1):81–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lui D, Chen D, Tan Q et al (2020) Outcome of selective laser trabeculoplasty in young patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Ophthalmol 8:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  37. Baser EF, Akbulut D (2015) Significant peripheral anterior synechiae after repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol 50(3):36–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weinnand FS, Althen F (2006) Long-term clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schlote T, Kynigopoulos M (2016) Selective laser trabeculoplasty: 1 year results in early and advanced open angle glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 365:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Francis BA, Ianchulev T, Schofield JK et al (2005) Selective laser trabeculoplasty as a replacement for medical therapy in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 140:524–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee JW, Chan CV, Wong MO et al (2014) A randomized control trial to evaluate the effect of adjuvant selective laser trabeculoplasty versus medication alone in primary open-angle glaucoma: preliminary results. Clin Ophthalmol 8:1987–1992

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee R, Hutnik VML (2006) Projected cost comparison of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus glaucoma medication in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. Can J Ophthalmol 41:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wong MO, Lee JW, Choy BN et al (2015) Systemic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 60:36–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Song J (2016) Complications of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review. Clin Ophthalmol 10:137–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rhodes KM, Weinstein R, Saltzmann RM et al (2009) Intra ocular pressure reduction in the untreated fellow eye after selective laser trabeculoplasty. Curr Med Res Opin 25:787–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kara N, Altınkaynak H, Şatana B et al (2011) Evaluation of factors influencing outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open angle glaucoma. Turk J Ophthalmol 41:304–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

It is a single-authored study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekrem Kurnaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Bezmialem Foundation University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Teknoloji Transfer Ofisi Etik Kurullar Birimi) 11.05.2023-106959.

Patient consent

Consent was obtained from the patients themselves for those over 18 years and from the parents for younger patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurnaz, E. Selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of juvenile open angle glaucoma patients under 25 years of age. Int Ophthalmol 44, 201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03108-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03108-7

Keywords

Navigation